ms. chapman. are there any other members of the public here for item number two for public comment? >> clerk: there are no other members of the public waiting for public comment at this time. >> chairman: okay. public comment is closed. in all seriousness, as to the second speaker's question about fiscal impact in so far as this is a fee for a service and that service is not being provided. there is no fiscal impact because there's no work being done to measure the accuracy of the device during this brief period as we figured out and the state figures out how to measure t.n.c. devices which is going to take a little while and just so that that speaker knows the amount of money collected on an annual base i've been informed is less than $200,000 per end. with that, i would like to make motion to send this item to the full board with the positive recommendation of the co-sponsors of supervisor mandelman and chan. on that, a roll call vote, please. >> clerk: yes. on that motion, [roll call] the motion passes without objection. >> chairman: mr. clerk, in so far as the third item is easy

ms. chapman for your time. >> caller: oh, good afternoon, commissioners.chutis and i sent you an email on saturday with changes of structures that are not adus and what they mean to the loss of natural habitat in rear yards. i know that you're concerned about that. and that is just before you started and sfgov-tv is a cool thing and i heard about the gardens and they'll have a garden day in the end of september. anyway, i sent you an email about alvin duskin who died in july and not acknowledged by the "san francisco chronicle", which is kind of surprising. and i just think that he was precedent and prudent and so many of the things that he did in the 1970s -- i had never met him, i moved here in 1979 -- but i certainly heard about him and i know people and met people who talk about him with great fondness. and, you know, you're talking about high rises today, and office space, which is sort of interesting. and "the chronicle" did talk about office space and they had several articles in there about it. so i guess that i would acknowledge alvin duskin, and

ms. chapman i apologize to interrupt you this afternoon. we are setting the timer for two minutes. operations, let's hear from the next caller. welcome, caller. >> caller: hello, my name is [indiscernible] and i currently live in district 11, and i wanted to call in regards to the context of what net positive, actionable, um, efforts in regards to equity and the term equity itself. so the term equity in the past eight months that i have been participating in local government related items, just like voicing my opinion, i feel like it's been used a lot loosely. and the meaning of that has been, like, just watered down quite significantly. for example, it's used as a method to justify something that kind of puts us on a positive for the whole community as a whole, like, maybe some district alone itself, you know, which i totally understand. but in regards to equity, i was hoping that, you know, when using the term just keeping in mind that when used, it should be envisioned with the equity of the whole entire s.f. city, not just particularly a neighborhood or a district. again, i tot

ms. chapman. can we have the next caller. >> hello commissioners. my name is christopher peterson. i am a resident of district seven and 94112 zip code. i support much in the resolution especially the provisions calling for improved transit services to golden gate park. the provisions it would allow people from certain parts of the city to parks for free at the music concourse garage regardless of what their household income might be however conflicts with the transit first policies without advancing any equity purpose. the charter requires parking policies for areas well served by public transit to be designed to encourage travel by public transit and alternative transportation to allow all residents in certain zip codes to park at the garage for free regardless of income, while encourage people from those areas to drive instead of take transit. this is especially true of zip codes 94112, 94133, and also parts of the knob hill parts of 94108. large areas of those zip codes do not remotely qualify as lower income neighborhoods. also, for my zip code 94112, routes 29, 43, and 44 ser

ms. chapman. can we have the next caller. >> hello commissioners. my name is christopher peterson. i am a resident of district seven and 94112 zip code. i support much in the resolution especially the provisions calling for improved transit services to golden gate park. the provisions it would allow people from certain parts of the city to parks for free at the music concourse garage regardless of what their household income might be however conflicts with the transit first policies without advancing any equity purpose. the charter requires parking policies for areas well served by public transit to be designed to encourage travel by public transit and alternative transportation to allow all residents in certain zip codes to park at the garage for free regardless of income, while encourage people from those areas to drive instead of take transit. this is especially true of zip codes 94112, 94133, and also parts of the knob hill parts of 94108. large areas of those zip codes do not remotely qualify as lower income neighborhoods. also, for my zip code 94112, routes 29, 43, and 44 ser

ms. chapman, that concludes your time. >> caller: good afternoon. hi, it is georgia schutus. i sent in a video of this project that i have been talking about that is 2 1/2 minutes long so there's not enough time to show it here but i do hope that the commissioners and the staff will watch it. and the video was taken about a week ago. and the video and email sent with it on september 18th focuses on what is left of the revival house and it highlights how a second unit could have been added to create two family-sized units without the astounding, expensive and long processes now underway in a house that has been occupied since 2017. but there are four photos of the excavation and i think that your staff may show them. this excavation is extreme and that can be seen in the loss of the natural rear yard, mid-block open space, this is reduced to nothing more than an outdoor bunker. there are two photos that i sent from december 2018d.r. hearing which is the abbreviated analysis. they were your photos -- the staff's photos, that show the yard as it was before the approval. and then

ms. chapman i apologize to interrupt you this afternoon. we are setting the timer for two minutes. operations, let's hear from the next caller. welcome, caller. >> caller: hello, my name is [indiscernible] and i currently live in district 11, and i wanted to call in regards to the context of what net positive, actionable, um, efforts in regards to equity and the term equity itself. so the term equity in the past eight months that i have been participating in local government related items, just like voicing my opinion, i feel like it's been used a lot loosely. and the meaning of that has been, like, just watered down quite significantly. for example, it's used as a method to justify something that kind of puts us on a positive for the whole community as a whole, like, maybe some district alone itself, you know, which i totally understand. but in regards to equity, i was hoping that, you know, when using the term just keeping in mind that when used, it should be envisioned with the equity of the whole entire s.f. city, not just particularly a neighborhood or a district. again, i tot