ms. claire -- claire van ski. are you speaking? >> i thought to there was a longer list ahead of me. i just want to make a few specific points. one is that this commissioner mike >>[reading] said was etc. annual lunch and this topic came up. i did point out to our members that we do not know the specifics in the details, but when just the discussion this came up, the groans and human cries from the membership those present was very significant to their very very upset as retirees that any part of the pension fund would be at such high risk. i would suggest to you that probably the return on this do not need the basics of your investment policy. but we do not know because we have not seen the details. i am wondering, since before he moved up to the 644 meetings, there was discussion of previous meetings about sf ers getting known building were purchasing or modeling remodeling the building as i look at properties around us here being taken over and bought and sold and remodeled and being worked on, and i have heard nothing at the meetings. i have tried to attend every meeting you i do

government individual claire judge is a different matter they have to follow through and make some exceptions after the court permitted marriage to pass a law to deal with the issues including msues. >> if it is a state law he can make exceptions. a constitutional requirement and every state allows ministers to marry people they are affected under state law. that will not be the case if we hold a constitutional matter that the state must marry two men. >> ms. chernomyrdin, maybe you're not understanding justice scalia's question. many rabbis will not conduct marriages between jewish and non-jewish notwithstanding they have a constitutional decision against discrimination and make it all the powers and privileges of the state even if they have that rule. many rallies won't do that. >> it leaves the question open. >> do you agree that ministers will not have to conduct same-sex marriage? >> i believe that is affirmative . who decides it is not about the court versus the state. inmates the choice of whom to marry. >> thank you, counsel. [shouting] >> would you like to take a moment? >> i will. thank you. >> mr. chief justice, the court is ready. >> rather reflash in actually. >>