ms. cleary. and i do think as part of our analysis of the e.i.r., we do need to be mindful of the fact that there are a number of mitigations that are being -- that are going to be required, things that are going to be asked of the city agencies that because of the level of commitment that those mitigations require, it's not clear in my estimation whether or not we will be able to pay for that. and i look forward to hearing directly from some of those city agencies and in specific the port of san francisco. i think that if we know that there's an environmental impact that needs to be mitigated, i think we owe it not only legally but i think morally to make sure that we as a city are going to make those mitigations happen. and so i think that's part of the relevant piece of analysis with respect to sequa. but i appreciate that response. i recognize that we need to engage in that discussion. thank you. >> thank you. supervisor, questions to planning? >> at this time why don't i ask if we could have