ms. collins? ms. collins? >> i'm very sorry. in terms of the children who are not disclosing for the reasons you are saying, not believing they're going to be believed. the abused and not have been so settled that the child doesn't know it a point that this is wrong or there was somebody who is going to listen. >> when they ask you how to perpetrate the addendum and then desperation, fear, finite because usually it's not once incident. they are often confused about what happened and hurt and ashamed. but then after repeated behavior, usually from the same predator cover a much used the term predator here. stocking predatory act dvd, then the child gets them together and comes forward and people react in a way that is not helpful to the child. do we have data on not? >> i do not have data regarding today's children. we do know from the department of justice study that only one third as individuals who indicate they were abused actually reported it. >> mr. kennedy? to your thoughts on not? we are going to go to mandatory reporting

ms. collins. mr. servone. >> thank you chairwoman mikulski and senator casey and other members of the committee for this opportunity to testify today and thank you, senator casey, in particular for calling for this hearing, for continued leadership in this area. we know that you are a great friend for children and health care in early education and health care and all the ways we know we can turn to you. thank you very much. the support center for child advocates is still a volunteer lawyer program for abused and neglected children. we are a big shot for kids and represent about 850 children each year in court in various times of the victimization cases. i insisted today in this presentation by the work of kathleen and our colleagues in the protect our children committee which has spent the statewide coalition about tickets and physicians and service providers. i'd like to put some of the events of the recent days and weeks into context reflecting the reality that many more children are physically and

ms. collins. [inaudible] >> they do, chairwoman and thank ranking member, senator, andi other members of the committee for this opportunity to testifyy today. thank you, senator casey, in, se particular, for calling for thig hearing and your continued leadn in this area.a. we in new york great friend for gr children in health care andorc early education and child care.e we know we can turn to you.ou. thank you very much.ch the support center for childr fl advocates is a volunteer lawyer program for abused and neglected children. we are a big washout for kids represented by 852 in each year in court in various types of victimization cases.ctimation ims system today by the work ofe kathleen palm and our colleaguen in the protect our childrenpr sommittee, which is pennsylvania's statewide coalition of advocates,and physd physicians, and service providers. i would like to put some of the events of recent days and weeks weeks into context reflecting thethe t reality that many more children are physical

ms. collins? >> i'm very sorry. in terms of the children who are not disclosing for the reasons you are saying not believing they're going to be believed. the abused and not have been so settled that the child doesn't know it a point that this is wrong or there was somebody who is going to listen. >> when they ask you how to perpetrate the addendum and then desperation, fear, finite because usually it's not once incident. they are often confused about what happened and hurt and ashamed. but then after repeated behavior usually from the same predator cover a much used the term predator here. stocking predatory act dvd then the child gets them together and comes forward and people react in a way that is not helpful to the child. do we have data on not? >> i do not have data regarding today's children. we do know from the department of justice study that only one third as individuals who indicate they were abused actually reported it. >> mr. kennedy? to your thoughts on not? we are going to go to mandatory reporting. i

ms. collins. mr. servone. >> thank you chairwoman mikulski and senator casey and other members of the committee for this opportunity to testify today and thank you, senator casey, in particular for calling for this hearing, for continued leadership in this area. we know that you are a great friend for children and health care in early education and health care and all the ways we know we can turn to you. thank you very much. the support center for child advocates is still a volunteer lawyer program for abused and neglected children. we are a big shot for kids and represent about 850 children each year in court in various times of the victimization cases. i insisted today in this presentation by the work of kathleen and our colleagues in the protect our children committee which has spent the statewide coalition about tickets and physicians and service providers. i'd like to put some of the events of the recent days and weeks into context reflecting the reality that many more children are physically and

ms. nagy from indiana school of law. 's. chairman lieberman, ranking member collinsand members of the committee, i am honored with invitation to testify. my name is ms. nagy and i am a professor of law at indiana university. in my 17 years as a professor i have co-authored a treatise on insider trading and i've written many articles, including one published last may on the precise topic of today's hearing. the article sought to debunk what at the time was becoming an urban myth, that congress had exempted itself where was somehow immune from the existing law that prohibits insider trading. congress in the which is not to immunize or exempt itself. beyond that, the article concludes that congressional insider trading is already illegal under existing law. based on my research i would expect a cordial the member of congress liable for any securities trading that is based on material nonpublic information obtained through congressional service. if the sec or doj successfully proved facts alleged, i acknowledge, however, that many distinguished security law scholars, the

ms. richardson for five minutes. >> yes, thank you, mr. chaiman. i want to thank you chairman ring, ranking member collins for bringing this forward on this important subject. gentleman, thank you for your service. i'm going to ask you a couple questions that would simply require a yes or no answer. question number one, is there a threat military communities limited to only islamic extremists? yes or no. i will start with you, secretary stockton. >> thank you for that question. that allows me to address a couple of the other questions. >> i'm sorry, mr. stockton. i am not a ranking member with the leadership, so i've only got five minutes. so just simply a yes or no. >> al qaeda, its affiliates and adherents are primary threat. that is the center of gravity, but we recognize other threats confront the united states as well. >> thank you, sir. mr. stuteville. >> man, and keeping to your yes or no answer, i say no in this particular case. >> the question was, is very threat to military communities only limited to islamic extremism in your answers now, correct correct? >> correct. and lieutenant colonel sawy