ms. duvall told our colleagues at the irs about the problem she had done. she told the i.t. people should talk to the people in the office of chief counsel. should talk to the deputy associate chief counsel, and by the next day february 4, thomas kinkade of lois lerner's hard drive had crashed back in 2011 and that was why many of her e-mails were missing. the irs knew in early february that there was a problem with the e-mails. mr. koskinen testified he knew in february. this is his quote, on july 23, 2014 hearing, quote, what i was advised and new in february was that when you look at the knows that already been provided to the committee and other investigations, instead of looking at them by search terms template for them by date it was clear there were fewer e-mails in the period through 2011 and subsequently. there was also i was told that been a problem with ms. lerner's computer or so the question is what did mr. koskinen under subpoena to about a? he had the subpoena. he just learned most crucial evidence covered by the subpoena was missing and so you'd expect him to

ms. duval counsel to the commissioner at the time and she was basically managing the irs production to congress. the next day on february 3rd, ms. duval told the colleagues at the irs about the problem she found. she told the i.t. speem people. talked to the people in office of chief counsel, deputy associate chief counsel aby the next day february 4th, thomas cain figured out that the hard drive crashed back in 2011 and that that was why many of her e-mails were missing. so the irs knew in early february that there was a problem with ms. lerner's e-mails and mr. koskinen testified that he knew in february. this is his quote and july 23rd, 2014 hearing, quote, what i was advised and knew in february was that when you look at the e-mails that had been provided to the committee and other investigations and instead of looking by search terms, looked at them by date, it was clear fewer e-mails in the period through 2011 and subsequently. and there was also i was told there had been a problem with m

ms. duvall told her colleagues at the irs about the problems she had found. she told the ig people, she talked of the people in the office of chief counsel, she talked to the deputy associate chief counsel thomas kaine and by the next day february 4, scan it figured out that lois lerner's hard drive had crashed back in 2011 and that was why many of her e-mails were missing the irs knew in early february that there was a problem with ms. lerner's e-mails and mr. koskinen testified that he knew in february that this is his quote on july 23, 2014 hearing quote what i was advised anew in february was that when you look at these e-mails that have already been provided to the committee and other investigations and instead of looking at them by search terms looked at them by date was clear there were fewer e-mails than than that. matthew 20 lebanon subsequently. there was also island was told there had there had been a problem with ms. lerner's computer. the question is what did mr. koskinen under subpoena do about it? after all he had the subpoena. he just learned

ms. duvall was counsel to the commissioner and she was managing the subpoena. told her colleagues at the i.r.s. about the problems. she told the people, she talked to the people in the office of chief counsel. she talked to the deputy associate chief counsel. and by the thesked day february 4th thomas cain had figured out her hard drive had crashed back in 2011 and that was why many of her e-mails were missing. so the i.r.s. knew in early february there was a problem. and mr. koskinen testified he knew in february. this is his quote. what i was advised and knew in february was that when you look at the e-mails that had already been provided to the committee and other investigations and instead of looking by search terms looked by date it was clear that there were fewer e-mails in the period through 2011 and subsequently. and there was also i was told there had been a problem with ms. learner's computer. so the question is what did mr. koskinen do about it? he had this subpoena had just learned the most crucial evidence was missing. let's start with what he did