i talked to ms. elias and she told me that she reached out to each of us asking to meet several times. if we didn't take that opportunity to meet over several weeks, that's on us. number two, i have to echo supervisor cohen i'm so offended that a woman candidate with a distinguished career as a public defender, as an attorney in the california labor commissions office, is supposed to somehow talk about her husband and her husband's career while she's describing her own qualifications for a police commissions seat. i think that is the epitome of sexism. i know there are many male police commission candidate who have had other types of conflicts who have never been questioned about their partners' careers and jobs and i just find this entire attack and the article in "the chronicle" absolutely insulting. as a female supervisor with my own distinguished record, i hope that no one ever asks me about my husband's career when i apply for a seat on any body whatsoever. number three, this issue of it being an lgbt

i'm so excited, ms. elias, that you applied for this positio and i will be so proud to support you today. >> supervisor breed: thank you. supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, mesidt. two issues i want to lay out. one, severing apart from the "s "san fransisco chronicle" article, giving considerations is very important and i reached out to the deputy city attorney that looks at ethics issues and am very pleased thathe- actually, both nom ms. -- nominees went to the city attorney to make sure they don't have inherent conflicts. there are instanc just like we do, where someone might have to recuse themselv bause of income from a spouse and ms. elias is cognizant of that fact andone digence with the city attorney. i wanted to rise and put that on therd. i generally in instances like this do want to defer to a colleague that wants a continuance, but given all of what's been going on around the police commission and i realize this is special day and election day, but the fact that we actually have at

ad aupervisor sheehy: i have conversation or met with ms. elias. there was an issue raise in "throniche" and i would be very grateful if we cd delay this a week so that opportunity would be possible. this was an lgbtq seat. and i know that many in the community had an expectation that someone from the lgbtq community could be put forward. we did have a cande. that ndidate, it was decided they had a conflict of interest. and now we have another issue around the conflict of interest. and, again, this is not to say that i would not support this candidate, but i would appreciate thep theourty o the opportunity to meet with this individual. other members have raised this issue in the past whenyhave't hy meet with someone. i think it would be -- i would be grateful if we could put this off for a ek.we >> svisor eed: supervisor sheehy, are you asking we divide the filede name rward and hold on the other name? >> supervisor sheehy: yes, thank you. >> supervisor breed: i would be ing t support at, especially since we desperately need a quorum for the police

it seems to me and i think ms. elias and i would have a fair amount of subject matter expertise. these are things we have seen as problematic both to public offenders and dtrict attorney is not happy about the status as well. >> that's correct. i don't know. i haven't seen the district attorney's complete list. these are issues they raised in the past. we are operating the dpa independently. we have identified these as top three issues in regards to the body-worn camera issues. i will say these issues have not gone away. to the department's credit, these are issues we have been in discussions myself personally with the chief and talked about the things as well evolving the policy as it stands now. what happens we rollouts the initial policy then what you are see anything the reports are feedback from transgressions we have specifically observed over the course of complaints that have been made. just to clarify what thatksoo like we will make these policy types of recommendations independent of complaints we may get a complaint about something else. we will notice the transgressio