ms. farrell said 100 pandit of dollars a year. i think she meant $125 a month. whenever the income is, it seems as though as the situation financially has been described, ms. ramos use it as a figure of some significance. president goh: with regard to the $125 a year, it is in the record. they went to small claims court and sued, expecting $125 a month. the apparently learned it was in fact $125 a year. that is the suit that is in exhibit f, dated september 17, 2010. >> other comments, commissioners? commissioner peterson: i will echo vice-president -- vice president garcia's comments, as in the prior case. vice president garcia: i thought you were still speaking. commissioner peterson: i am just looking for something. vice president garcia: i would overturn the department and grant the appeal, with findings [unintelligible] >> commissioners, shall we call the roll on that? commissioner fung: i -- sorry i did not speak up earlier. i should have spoken up. but i think my reason for where i am going to vote should be brought forth. i am not going to go into a lot o

ms. farrell provides, it takes the release letter and assumes she signed the letter. let us look at the prerequisites. cbs outdoor were not paying for their advertising sign. that is not true. there were just paying the wrong property because they did not know it had changed. it said all attempts to contact the company had failed. that is not correct. it says it would be a logical outcome to seek resolution of this problem. perhaps one goods sold simply suggested to remove the sign -- perhaps one good soul simply suggested to remove the sign. that gouod soul was the lawyer. what happened here is he dictated this termination letter to mrs. ramos. it was not forged. it was drafted by her attorney. it did not happen until a year later, when she realized she could not put up her own son, that she objected to it. she did not object before that. >> thank you. mr. sider? >> members of the board, good evening again. dan sider, planning department's staff. to get it out of the way, i draw your attention to the similarities between this matter and the one you just heard, partic

supervisor farrel has reached out, including a meeting with the supervisor, representatives of both organizations, and a member of the planning department staff, ms. rogers. during the meeting, several suggestions were made to craft legislation as it is now. the ban on formula retail came out of our discussions with the merchants association and others and is intended to preserve the unique character of the upper fillmore area. the supervisor also checked in with the former executive director of the golden gate restaurant association, who expressed his support of the legislation. our office continues to receive feedback and will continue to listen before this is heard at the land use committee. this is on the agenda for march 2011 at that committee. we look for to hearing any conditions and consideration gma's. thank you for your consideration. president o'brien: commissioner adams. vice president adams: i totally support this legislation. i have seen this in other areas, particularly union street, castro street, elsewhere, where this has gone forward, and in these economic times, there are vacant storefronts, in union street in particular has be