ms. garcia. mr. rose wonder we go to the updated dp report. >> on page 83, for 13-14 recommended reductions are 1,139,136, and in 14-15 1,213,260 which is that -- those are again general fund reductions. >> supervisor farrell: thank you mr. rose. any questions for mr. rose or ms. garcia or anyone else at dph? supervisor mar. >> supervisor mar: ms. garcia, yesterday at the board of supervisors meeting the number of people testified about the concern about acute psychiatric services especially in year 2 and what the plans are for making sure that we are adequately supporting communities in need and i am just wondering if you could respond? >> with the mayor's mental health cuts -- we believe that we are trying to meet the needs of the community as well as the san francisco general discharge ability. medicare cut -- we cannot have anyone to long in a psychiatric bed. -- as a way to prepare them for the next level of care. they have not opposed that change and there is no loss of clement. most import

ms. garcia or mr. wagner could respond. i know they submitted a very late request. they emphasize that their physician's pay is so low compared to other hospitals and they're having always have a hard time with high turnover and what they all unfunded non discretionary physician increases -- i believe range adjustments in the salaries that they say is not included and i am wondering what advice do you have for them and it's about 3.1 million dollars amount and lead to increases and be competitive with other hospitals? >> i think it's an important topic. we've been working with them since i have been the director. we have increased the contribution to them. in this year's budget we couldn't provide the whole amount they were asking for. it is true that they do have some problems in competition but we always can't fulfill every need that they have so we will work closely with them if they don't get additional funds with the impact as we do every year but we had a gradual increase in their costs over the last three years i have been working on the budget with them and

ms. garcia. can we take that motion to accept the budget analyst recommendations as revised for the controller suggestion? can we do that without opposition? (gavel) i do see the chief hear from juvenile probation. >> good morning supervisors. chief -- juvenile probation department to inform this body of our belief in the final recommendations that mr. rose's office is provided and we are in agreement and would ask for your approval of the juvenile probation department's budget. >> supervisor farrell: can go to your updated report please mr. rose? >> we have revised our report on page 68 where we recommended previously 212,927, we are not recommending reductions of 143,088, on page 68. similarly for fy 14-14 recommended 135,566, we are now recommending reductions of 146-- >> supervisor farrell: we have a motion to accept the budget analyst's recommendations? can we do so without opposition? so moved. (gavel). at this time we have three departments that we have not heard of. starting at 11:30 -- o

garcia and mr. king said he's going to come back. then go to ms. tomlin and to mr. garcia and then come back after votes. >> i would rather ms. tomlin speak to the people when they're here. it doesn't make sense that she speak -- i know of her good work and incrediblens work. i know about the good work. maybe we should be here to listen. >> i understand, many members may not come back after. are more ow if there members then than there are now. >> go ahead, i'm sorry. >> thank you. have a vote to get to. it is really important how we engage in this discussion and dialogue.of at no point did i say i believe law enforcement is too dumb to immigration law. let's be clear -- in my world, i have to deal with facts and evidence. i don't get extra credit for representing undocumented immigrants. an extra chance. i need to deal with the facts in evidence. the facts in evidence show from findings, from the department of justice that under entire g program in its incarnation, the way it operates now, there are patterns of violations.onal what we're pointing out today. as an ex

garcia, and we will then come back after votes. >> mr. chairman, i think it makes sense that we just go back -- i'd rather ms. tumlen speak to people when they're here. i know of her good work and organization's incredible work. i know of california race saw's good work, maybe we should all be here to listen as opposed into letting her speak into nothingness. >> i understand, but many members may not -- >> we're going to leave the last few minutes of this recorded event to take you to the u.s. senate. a quick reminder you can see this hearing and any c-span event anytime online at c-span.org. the senate today gaveling in to start their week. general speeches are up first until 5:00 when lawmakers will turn to a pair of judicial nominations. votes on those are scheduled for 5:30. we expect more debate after the votes on the immigration policy bill. now live to the senate floor here on c-span2. the president pro tempore: the senate will come to order. the chaplain, dr. barry black, will lead the senate in prayer. the chaplain: let us pray. o, omnipotent, sovereign god, beneath whose all seeing eye our mortal li