ms. gibson. have any questions or comments? >> supervisor peskin: madam chair, i would keep it to a minimum. do you really think through the chair, to ms. gibson, that in the 530 matter, the moving issue was the cortese list? that's 256-unit residential building that i have championed now for a decade and a half. do you think that the cortese list was the moving issue in that that you invoked? >> supervisor peskin, through the chair. i was not saying that the cortese site issue was the moving issue for that project. i brought it up to illustrate the fact that project requires mitigation. therefore, that is the reason why that project requires a higher level of review, mitigating negative declaration as opposed to the other kinds of projects as i was providing as examples. that are ones that would qualify for a common sense exemption currently under the state law. >> i apologize if it distracted. >> supervisor peskin: if i may through the chair, this is not even apples and oranges. this is not eve

ms. gibson. do we have any questions or comments? >> supervisor peskin: madam chair, i would keep it to a minimum. do you really think through the chair, to ms. gibson, that in the 530 matter, the moving issue was the cortese list? that's 256-unit residential building that i have championed now for a decade and a half. do you think that the cortese list was the moving issue in that that you invoked? >> supervisor peskin, through the chair. i was not saying that the cortese site issue was the moving issue for that project. i brought it up to illustrate the fact that project requires mitigation. therefore, that is the reason why that project requires a higher level of review, mitigating negative declaration as opposed to the other kinds of projects as i was providing as examples. that are ones that would qualify for a common sense exemption currently under the state law. >> i apologize if it distracted. >> supervisor peskin: if i may through the chair, this is not even apples and oranges. this is n

ms. gibson's absence means that trend actually continues today. disappointing. i am going to ask you both a series of yes or no questions because i am lichlted in time. but before i begin, it's important to note that we understand that most of the capitol police board members were not in those roles, on january 6th. our goal is to set expectations for the operations of the board, moving forward. and to -- to determine where consensus exists among the members of the police board. you will have time to elaborate on your answers later, if there's disagreement. but for now, a simple yes or no to the following questions would be great. yes or no? did the capitol police board act in a timely and effective manner in response to the events on january 6th? general walker? >> no, sir. >> mr. bl ooh nton? >> no. >> yes or no? do you believe the capitol police board should be reformed? general walker? >> no, sir. >> mr. blanton? >> i'm sorry. can you repeat the question? >> do you believe that the capitol police board should be reformed? >> the operations of it, yes, sir. >

ms. kaun gibson the bill assistance programming that are currently available on that particular item, it has to do with the income eligibility for c.a.r.e. and f.e.r.a. customers. and so that had to do with the low income assistance programming. she also had a section as well on section eight. one of the consequences the possibility that folks who are in affordable housing if their power is shut off. she also took into consideration vulnerable population 65 plus and those under 12 months. part of that is around providing, you know, medically necessary equipment to folks who need that life-saving equipment. she also talked about the disconnection rate. the advocates that are currently involved in the rule making process that don't want to use the zip code data as determining eligibility for relief because there's some inconsistencies and some further research needs to be done on that. number 5 was the reconnection goal. that has mostly to do with the late fees and reconnection fees that are required after a customer has been disconnected. the same for establishment and re-establishment de

ms. kaun gibson the bill assistance programming that are currently available on that particular item, it has to do with the income eligibility for c.a.r.e. and f.e.r.a. customers. and so that had to do with the low income assistance programming. she also had a section as well on section eight. one of the consequences the possibility that folks who are in affordable housing if their power is shut off. she also took into consideration vulnerable population 65 plus and those under 12 months. part of that is around providing, you know, medically necessary equipment to folks who need that life-saving equipment. she also talked about the disconnection rate. the advocates that are currently involved in the rule making process that don't want to use the zip code data as determining eligibility for relief because there's some inconsistencies and some further research needs to be done on that. number 5 was the reconnection goal. that has mostly to do with the late fees and reconnection fees that are required after a customer has been disconnected. the same for establishment and re-establishment de

ms. kaun gibson the bill assistance programming that are currently available on that particular item, it has to do with the income eligibility for c.a.r.e. and f.e.r.a. customers. and so that had to do with the low income assistance programming. she also had a section as well on section eight. one of the consequences the possibility that folks who are in affordable housing if their power is shut off. she also took into consideration vulnerable population 65 plus and those under 12 months. part of that is around providing, you know, medically necessary equipment to folks who need that life-saving equipment. she also talked about the disconnection rate. the advocates that are currently involved in the rule making process that don't want to use the zip code data as determining eligibility for relief because there's some inconsistencies and some further research needs to be done on that. number 5 was the reconnection goal. that has mostly to do with the late fees and reconnection fees that are required after a customer has been disconnected. the same for establishment and re-establishment de