courtney. >> ms. hale would you mind coming backup to the front for a moment please i'm trying to scroll through and look at section 16 the sub contractor clause could you be kind-enough to develop on that and for the commission just in your own words exactly what that means for us please you are on section i'm sorry you said 16. >> looking at the table of kents on page 16-12.11. >>> yes. >> sub contractors. >>> so the contract we are looking at here is a pacific gas and electric company standard contract that they are authorized to use for the interconnection of small generators. the sub contractor clause that the commission irpoints us too allows the parties to use any sub contractor they they deem appropriate to perform the work the work being the interconnection of the facility to pg&e's grid. the facility that is we are talk about here would be installation of a revenue quality meter at the site cite that will allow p g and 'em have the -- control of the generation and to charge us for any services as

>> thank you, thank you, chair avalos, ms. hale, could you just explain what the geographical area of pg and e's territory is. er >> it serves most of northern california from about fresno north to the oregon border, from east to west, pg and e does not serve the north eastern portion of california or parts of the sierra nevada, and the northern part of the sierra nevada range. there are imbedded within that geography, i just described publicly owned utilities, for example, redding, so that's a pocket of that broad area that pg and e does not serve. >> but would you anticipate that a lot of their 30 thousand residential customers would probably be around berkeley and san francisco and marine county and santa cruz. >> yes, i would expect it to be coastal communities reflecting the values we see in other choices in those communities as well. >> and then you mention clean power sf will be ramped up to about 50 to 90 thousand customers on day 1, what's the current customer base of pg and e in san francisco? >> pg and e residential acco

thing that we can do whether it's the water out of the substation or solar installations under -- ms. hale has been working hard to get the economics of those projects worked out we are working on a plan it's just that weapon to start with the first phase to see how it actually goes and gets implemented before we do anything larger.. >> any further public comment? >>> david i just want today agree with today's comment about risk i used the word distractions at the last meetings and i'm not a verse to the advocates proposal and or some scales version of it but i just continue to reinforce that these efforts not threaten or under plain our existing utility work in water power and sewer and i can't express that concern enough so i'm not yet convinced that we should commit any hetchy power to this if it proves and we have resource, available, i'm up to that and we should be open to that but we have got to see i think, today just made the comment that we should walk before we can run and we have not been in the retail business to multiple customers like this before. we should see that we can do