ms. hester for bricking that up, is felt to be significant in the e-i-r with six pages of adaptation measures trying to deal with that. but one of the benefits i think will be if we pursue environmental review under sb 73 5, we may not have to look at for example cumulative impacts on the regional level, things like that. but it is complicated and what we'll be doing in the near future as the e-i-r comes to conclusion and is certified, we'll be working more closely with our city attorneys and coming up probably with a matrix -- [speaker not understood], but with a matrix of if the project meets certain criteria, what is the best path and what are the benefits of per suing regular c-e-q-a exemption or regular c-e-q-a review versus under sb 375 versus under sb 2 26 which is another piece of legislation for infill housing, and as i'm sure most of you know other potential legislation making its way through the state legislature currently. >> okay. i think i would just ask that you report back to the commission on -- i understand the e-i-r gets completed maybe will get litigated. i think it is jus

ms. hester for bricking that up, is felt to be significant in the e-i-r with six pages of adaptation measures trying to deal with

ms. hester for bricking that up, is felt to be significant in the e-i-r with six pages of adaptation measures trying to deal with that. but one of the benefits i think will be if we pursue environmental review under sb 73 5, we may not have to look at for example cumulative impacts on the regional level, things like that. but it is complicated and what we'll be doing in the near future as the e-i-r comes to conclusion and is certified, we'll be working more closely with our city attorneys and coming up probably with a matrix -- [speaker not understood], but with a matrix of if the project meets certain criteria, what is the best path and what are the benefits of per suing regular c-e-q-a