ms. hester? >> sue hester. up until now, most of the projects that come for prop. k exceptions on shadow have been a joint hearing by the planning commission at rec park where the shadow [inaudible] had a hearing and a vote by rec park and about by the planning commission and then after that, the planning commission went to consideration of the project. i think that is a good procedure because it pulls out as prop k did the whole idea of testimony on the shadows. two hours ago, one hour ago, the rec park commission heard the issue that is number 13 on your agenda. and they heard the shadow impact and they were explicit discussions among the rec park commissioners that the only thing that was relevant was not the project, but the shadows of the project. when you don't have a biforindicated hearing like you do when you have a joint hearing and you have it all lumped together with a through e, and don't only have one hearing, you are required to muddle the whole issue. you only have testimony -- little bit of testimony on the shadows and mostly it is about the merits