ms. hester referred to. our intent in san francisco is to abide to the letter and spirit of the law, and we would expect this to run as a normal rental project with the exception of the 38 hotel rooms which are explicitly called out. >> if i could clarify. this is subject to the same rules as any other building. the only person who can register for short term rentals is the permanent resident of the unit. >> thank you. it is a great project. >> next item. >> just for the benefit of the public in case anyone is here for item 15 at 225 vazquez or item 18 those are continued. 2019-18,609th avenue conditional use authorization. >> just a second, sir. >> good afternoon. jeff warn planning department staff. presenting conditional use authority 1862 ninth avenue. this is a request for conditional use for the tantamount to demolition of a two-story home to commit 7,000 gross four-foot stamly dwelling within the residential house two family district. the project site is located east site of ninth avenue within the in

ms. hester. any other public comment on this item? public comment is now closed. >> commissioner fung. >> two questions for staff. the change in the fee structure is applied to new projects? >> planning department staff. yes, this is to confirm that if the recommendation to index a fee is accepted, then the existing projects, including the 450 project will be -- we'll collect the fee at the intext street so no projects to date have actually triggered this fee so any projects moving forward will be collected at the rate. >> thank yo >> thank you explain to me the oversight mechanism for expenditures of the north of market fund versus the city wide fund? >> so for this specific fund, all of the collected fees will be dedicated and solely used in the boundaries of the north of market residential special use district and that's located -- the boundaries are highlighted on page 2 of the packet. if i can invite amy chan to speak a little bit more about the way of the other city wide housing funds are allocated. >> the question really relate

ms. harris, she may have talked about the changes that are on here, sue hester, i was san franciscans growth and i attended every single hearing on the downtown plan with three engineers that worked with me on dealing with what became the office limits in the housing fee, and the transit fee. they all came from a lot of work. years of work from the people in the city. i want to point out a couple of things that are just in here, one of the things that jumped out to me was page 3 report on the office allocations. i have the office allocation report that you were given two months ago, three months ago 10 months ago, by cory teague on the office allocations. the pending small-cap projects on the pending large-cap projects are not in the c-3 at all. i summarized them up there. four of the small caps are not in the c-3. the ones that are in the c-3. a lot of 4999 ft. . depending large-cap projects, 10 of them are not in the c-3. when i say c-3 r, ost. they are not in the downtown core. what that means is that the whole transit system that was talked about in the downtown plan, the fees that were