we will now hear from the permit holder, ms. hu. >> welcome. >> hello. i am evelyn hu and this is my husband. we are the recent owners of 24/7 2 vallejo street. we purchased the property two months ago. there is a whole history of issues of the building currently cleaned up. we are still in the process of cleaning up some of those things. i wanted to address a couple of things that just came up an hour before this hearing. she alluded to a set of plans that referred to the light well area specifically the deck and the stairs as unpermitted. i had a conversation with sanchez an hour ago where i was given notice of this. i just called my drafter. it appears there was a plan set prepared for conversation with our tenant referring to the fact that the deck that he enjoys currently that i believe he enjoys by himself exclusively we are permitting to be a private deck for him. the landlord tenant attorney wanted to specify between a space that did not be long to the tenanted before to a space that was permitted to him. this language of permitted not permitted

ms. hu. >> so when we had the approved plans we assumed everything was a firewall. it is correct that i think within the recent investigation period leading us to this appealing we have reason to believe some of those firewalls are just plywood. >> the question is -- mr. duffy would you ask the question complete infill or partial. >> are you building a new wall from the ground to the roof that is a wall or infilling 10 by 6. >> we want a full one hour wall. we thought that it would just be the 10 by 6. i think we have to redo the wall that is potentially not a firewall. the intent is a full firewall. does that answer the question? if not i can clarify. >> that is not on the plans. it is good to know. that is another permit you need. >> absolutely. we would file an addendum or another permit as appropriate to paysicly rectify the site position which is our intent full firewall. >> i am done. >> president honda has a question for deputy director duffy. >> i will let my fellow commissioners ask questions first. >> commissioner lazarus and commissioner chang. >> mr. duf

we will now hear from the permit holder, ms. hu. >> welcome. >> hello.and this is my husband. we are the recent owners of 24/7 2 vallejo street. we purchased the property two months ago. there is a whole history of issues of the building currently cleaned up. we are still in the process of cleaning up some of those things. i wanted to address a couple of things that just came up an hour before this hearing. she alluded to a set of plans that referred to the light well area specifically the deck and the stairs as unpermitted. i had a conversation with sanchez an hour ago where i was given notice of this. i just called my drafter. it appears there was a plan set prepared for conversation with our tenant referring to the fact that the deck that he enjoys currently that i believe he enjoys by himself exclusively we are permitting to be a private deck for him. the landlord tenant attorney wanted to specify between a space that did not be long to the tenanted before to a space that was permitted to him. this language of permitted not permitted refers to the to

if ms. hus not here, why don't we go to rafael picazo for seat 2. >> good morning, supervisor peskin. my name is rafael picazo. i'm the current applicant for district 2. born and raised in san francisco. i live in alameda now because of gentrification. but everything i do, i do for san francisco. i've worked here for 38 years in the school district. i'm an advocate for the people of the mission district on fair housing and low income housing. i proudly stand behind the student and the children of the san francisco school district and would like to see them catch up on all the lost education that they've, you know, received during the pandemic. i'm motivated 100% to be part of this group and to help out in making decisions and to bringing education equity back to the district and making sure everybody is fair and transparent as far as education is concerned. i would like to be part of the system and helping where help is needed. i'm here for the city of san francisco like i ed earlier. i love th

if ms. hus not here, why don't we go to rafael picazo for seat 2. >> good morning, supervisor peskin. my name is rafael picazo. i'm the current applicant for district 2. born and raised in san francisco. i live in alameda now because of gentrification. but everything i do, i do for san francisco. i've worked here for 38 years in the school district. i'm an advocate for the people of the mission district on fair housing and low income housing. i proudly stand behind the student and the children of the san francisco school district and would like to see them catch up on all the lost education that they've, you know, received during the pandemic. i'm motivated 100% to be part of this group and to help out in making decisions and to bringing education equity back to the district and making sure everybody is fair and transparent as far as education is concerned. i would like to be part of the system and helping where help is needed. i'm here for the city of san francisco like i ed earlier. i love th