ms. hubbard if you were able to do it electronic? ms. hubbard: yes, sir.e have already looked into having that on our website and we have a mobile app, as you point out, i think the millenials and younger generation do, they live by those. that would be a way to easily, they could even do combinations and it come -- it could compute those. i agree that most of that generation needs that but i disagree with ms. raskopf that our locations are similar. if you walk in dunkin' donuts there's one point of purchase and one menu board. ours is split throughout ther islow case. based on the rules as they're written, an advertisement, we would have to post the menu combinations on every single one of those pieces. mr. guthrie: we agree we want everybody to have information, how can we do it in a way that people don't look back, i could take you to davis county, kentucky, and show you the lunch lady making sure they get three paycheckles. they can't get in and reach on the glove and put it on the plate, that might violate federal regulations. i know you want to offer

ms. hubbard as well. one of the things you said, ms. liddle, was that as currently written, now, intent is a good thing. but as a lawmaker for a number of years, only a few years here, but a long time in the virginia legislature, if you don't make it clear somebody will misinterpret the intent and while the intent may be not to charge your worker with a felony because they get a little excited with the cheese on the pizza or something where they don't follow the exact recipe, you've said the way it's currently written, they could be charged. is it a problem of the difference between the actual wording of the statute and the intent or do you all just disagree completely on -- ms. liddle: it's my understanding that this falls under the food and drug cosmetic act and under this there's sort of a presumption of guilt ahead of time. there are criminal penalties that could be put on folks and i -- mr. griffith: so you might like to see words like intentionally and repetitively or a pattern of intentional behavior. ms. liddle: correct. i agree

ms. hubbard, you are recognized for your summary. ms. hubbard: chairman, ranking member, members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today. i'm the c.e.o. of easy mart stores. it owns and operates nearly 300 convenience store in texas oklahoma, arkansas, and louisiana, all of which offer foods subject to regulations. i'm testifying on behalf of the national association of convenience stores. although more than 60% of our members operate single stores, many of these single store owners do so under the name of major large businesses like exxon that are covered by the labeling requirements. the convenience store industry strongly supports h.r. 2017, the commonsense nutrition disclosure act, and the effort to provide consumers nutrition information. most of the food sold is prepack aged, as has been discussed, and already provides this information. if congress enacts h.r. 2017 consumers would receive more nutrition information and would receive it in a way that is more useful to them. the food operations i

ms. hubbard you are recognized for five minutes. >> chairman ranking member green, and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today. my name is sonia hubbard and i am the ceo of easy mart. we own and operate 300 convenience stores in texas, oklahoma arkansas and louisiana all of which offer foods subject to the fda's current menu regulations. i am testifying on behalf of the national association of convenience stores. 60 percent of members operate single hp stores and many do business under the name of a major company or franchise of larger businesses covered by the menu requirements subject of the hearing today. the convenience store industry strongly sports hr 2017 the common sense nutrition disclosure act and the efforts to provide customers and consumers with nutrition information they want and need. indeed most of the food sold in the convenience store is pre-packaged as has been discussed and provides this information already. if congress enacts hr 2017 consumers receive more nutrition information than today and receive it in a way that is more usefu

ms. hubbard as well. one of the things you said, ms. liddle, was that as currently written, now, intent is a good thing. but as a lawmaker for a number of years only a few years here, but a long time in the virginia legislature, if you don't make it clear somebody will misinterpret the intent and while the intent may be not to charge your worker with a felony because they get a little excited with the cheese on the pizza or something where they don't follow the exact recipe, you've said the way it's currently written, they could be charged. is it a problem of the different between the -- difference between the actual wording of the statute and the intent or do you all just disagree completely on -- ms. liddle: it's my understanding that this falls under the food and drug cosmetic act and under this there's sort of a presumption of guilty ahead of time. -- guilt ahead of time. there are criminal penalties that could be put on folks and i -- mr. griffith: so you might like to see words like intentionally and repetively or a pattern of int