. >> we actually have sat down with ms. jones and director ram and mr. jocelyn and mr. fry and gone though how to communicate this; right? so in this was we're going to be voting on. >> hey just to add to that what was helpful it is helpful for the staff in particular the environmental review staff to understand the commissions concerns then we can communicate those concerns ahead of time to the project sponsor we're not just reacting to the eir but drafting it ahead of 7, 8, 9. >> 2 will think formally drafted as the historic preservation commission. >> commissioner antonini. >> on the same subject we have situations with the project sponsor or the commission has agreed to the preservation alternative oftentimes the new project isn't not conceptual you're wanting to delineate but sometimes, it's night and day so it's noting other things to throw out to you guys where the projects we're combining the historic elements. >> absolutely understand that's at&t's an issue as a policy on facadeism because they may not agree with the direction the commission is taking so we may

i do want to start with the idea with what ms. jones said and miss tam as well. the events criteria is unusual. what also is unusual with regard to this project is we have a through lot. there is not a lot of through lots in san francisco. when planning refers to the idea that we treat the front facade different from the back facade, typically in a historical preservation project, what the public see's is a front facade. here we have embarcadero and the street facade. that's what was in the evaluation and planning's follow up with the resource evaluation response. i think that's something to keepen mind. i want to also go to the direction of the.er and what are the facts that distinguish the stuart's street facade. those are clearly explained on page 59, the entire low down of what was happening uniquely. we listed that on our letters to you on page 4 and 5. there was a wall between two buildings. there there was the ila union hall. the ila organized out of that facility. again, uniquely localized connected to the building not as a result of architecture or perso

ms. joyce jones from b.e.t. there are so many in here. ray baker is somewhere in the audience. mr. clarence page from the chicago tribune. ms. joyce jones from bt. so many of them in here. ray baker is somewhere in the audience. i would be remiss if i did not acknowledge my press club. tristan francis, kenny. and so on behalf of the capitol press club we want to thank you. finally, we want to live to the young people in the back from the middle school wrestling against -- monday to interview the president. we will help them to get that question. thank you. had so if please, please be sure. he will sign it. it's a sign up to a member of the capital press club or the national press club's. we are out there, too. thank you so much for coming. leave your card if you want to be invited to future events. >> next, a hearing for -- farewell ceremony for secretary hagel. and then the future of the highway trust fund. on the next washington journal philip klein discusses the congressional republican approach to the affordable care act. and possible alternatives. afl-cio president talks about

ms. grace jones. we knocked on the door and said we're personal friends of grace jones.nd we were perplexed. we said no no no no. we tried the accent again no, we're personal friends -- whatever. at that point we knew we were not going to get into studio 54 that night. we went around the corner to my apartment which just happened to be one block away and we bought a couple of bottles of dom perignon, and we started jamming. i started playing this little groove. we were going ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪. ah f-off. f studio 54. f-off. f-off. f-studio 54. and we loved it. it sounded great. we were getting into, we wrote this bridge and we were talking about you know if a cab driver cuts you off f off. you know. and after jamming on that for a bit, my partner looks at me and he says you know my man you know this is happening. i said bernard we can't get this on the radio how are we going to -- it just doesn't work. so me being the hippy had a i am i said, oh -- that i am i said oh plan why don't we call it freak out. like when you drop acid, you freak out he says what are you talking about i

jones and ms. mack. frequent -- we've heard a lot of criticism about handling of persons coming over the border at the end. not just here in the surge, but another point, in other points, as well. the question i have -- there are two questions. one is when we -- when you talk about this questionnaire, i was -- part of me was, for lack of a better word, laughing a little bit. you're asking questions about people who may be literate, semi-lit rat. probably not conversant in english english. and my question is how do you assure that they fully understand what these questions mean in terms of what our objective standards are. i understand you say ef e we have a form. the answers determine whether we do or not. but the facts seem to indicate that 83% of these folks, else 13esh89ly ly especially during the zurj surge, without a hearing, without a judge just based on being turned away and that number seemed very, very high. and maybe it is or not. but in the absence of knowing that there are culturally competen