if that is the case, what we're recommending -- what ms. kelly is recommending is there be a delay in the hiring. that, we would concur with. >> yes, i agree. that is correct. supervisor chu: colleagues, can we entertain a motion to set the budget analyst recommendations on page 68 and with regard to the attrition savings items, they withdraw that item? can we do that? we do that without objection. with regard to the senior administrative analyst on page 69 -- it looks like there is no dollar value associated with that, correct? item on page 69? >> we would clarify that is a limited, a tenured position rather than fullbacks >> yes. >> to the director, just very quickly -- on page 69, the position we are having a little discrepancy over, that is not the earthquake position? >> no. supervisor cohen: maybe i missed something. can you tell me what happened to bthe admin position? did we approve it? >> no, we have not gotten to that yet. supervisor chu: colleagues, can we approve that? without objection. the items remaining relate primarily to the ear

ms. naomi kelly. raise your right hand and repeat after me.nstitution of the united states and the constitution that against allçw3ççfáçççç ea domestic -- u!çthat iççç wir trueçççççç faith and alleo the constitution of theççççd çççstates and the constitutif çççsthte ofç california -- t çççsthisçw3 obalifornia -- t or purpose of evasion -- and that i will well and faithfully discharge --q which i am about to enter -- s i hold the office of -- ççóçççcity admi for theççç;ççóçç city andn ççç[cheers and applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, history in our city is being made again, welcome the new city administrator, naomi kelly. [applause] >> thank you. w3ççñrççthank you, mr. mayof supervisors, members of the community, colleagues, and friends. i am very pleased to deliver my first remarks as your new city administrator. [applause] t(çççççthis has beenççxd. earlier today,ç i am sure you heard t, downxdç proposition 8,çç and affirming judgeççç walker's decisiní. [applause] in their ruling,

. >> thank you, ms. kelly. i'm the director of the bureau of criminal investigation and i stand here as representative of the commissioner of the state police colonel frank noonan and i echo the comments by general kelly and thank her and the agency for the cooperation that we have received throughout this investigation. i salute the prosecutors that prosecuted this case. i think that we all saw what this gentleman did in the courtroom. i salute him for that. but there was a lot of other work by the prosecution that went unseen. that was mr. frank fina and his staff and what they put together to bring this to a success. the officers and agents from the pennsylvania state police and the attorney general assigned to this case, they took it personal. they were dedicated to it. for the last two weeks, they have been away from their families and many of them have headed down the highway to reunite with them. i'm proud of them and proud of what they accomplished an proud of their effort. as a police officer, you lear

ms. manigold and mr. kelly. >> after all of the comment, i was waiting. the union spent some time looking at what was presented, not at the slide show but the actual presentation. we have some questions about what is going on. one thing that is nice to see is from the initial proposal to us until now, the district has had a knowledge is an additional $11 million that have come in. that is good to know. we find it instructive to learn that the central administrative costs have also grown 4.3%. we are concerned about some things that directly affect us and our members that you find in exhibit 6, which is on your page 52 in that booklet. one of the things have to do with the expenditures, savings, and offset salary savings for lows. -- furloughs. if you look adopted budget, i think i read that correctly, to say that there is $3,150,000 that was saved through the furloughs. if you look to the proposals for 2012-2013, it would be $4,750,000. according to what we paid for them, you will see this on the back of the first page, the second page. we paid $40 millio

ms. haines statement of their purpose. the kelly williams statement is first offered to show state of mind with regard to reporting this incident. less so, what happened on the 31st. the second reason the statement is relevant for a non-hearsay purpose is that there are substantial similarities between the account that ms. lopez gives to ms. williams and gave to ms. madison on the first. that tends to defeat the claim,, a claim of fabrication are in accuracy. it essentially gives greater weight to their testimony, in that they independently say that ms. lopez was relating to them the same basic facts about what happened. it tends to corroborate the credibility of these witnesses. the third reason we think it is admissible is we already have evidence that there was an incident on the 31st. we have other admissible evidence about what happened in that incident, in the form of the statement to ms. madison on the first. this is basically under the administrative hearsay exception. it is here say that is allowed to be considered. there i

ms. haines statement of their purpose. the kelly williams statement is first offered to show state of mind with regard to

ms. mann? >> no. >> mr. kelly? >> yes to mr. gregoire? >> needs improvement. >> mr. berenbaum. okay, yes or no. should congress consider a complete overhaul of appraisal regulations of consumers and businesses like? >> i think there is a serious need -- there is need to look at it. >> mr. button? guest. >> is your gregoire? >> mr. kelly? >> by which we should take a look at it. okay. >> improve the existing system. >> ms. stevens? >> yes. my time is expired. mr. sherman from california is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, matt interpreted mr. gregoire, the gics have created this new uniform appraisal database. which is used on all gs appraisals. how's that working out? >> fortunately, because of the work that i do, i have not had to complete one of those reports, however, i have heard from dozens if not hundreds of appraisers. >> could you be a little closer to the microphone? >> i have heard from dozens of appraisers about their experience come also from consumers. the uav method of reporting was not implemented to enhance the quality or the credibility of an appraisa

kelly williams? >> probably no relevance. chairperson hur: how is she different from ms. madison, if at all? >> i do not know if ms. mattison has will and testament. the sheriff has stated that he grabbed his wife's arm in a domestic argument. that is i think the substance of what ms. madison and ms. williams will tell you that ms. lopez told them. i am not convinced they have anything that you would need to hear. chairperson hur: thank you. >> before you leave. in view of what you just said, have you asked the city attorney, if we stipulate to those facts that you just said, will the city attorney agree that there is no need to put on witnesses who presumably are primarily going to testify to what ms. lopez told them happened? >> not in so many words. but just to give you a sense of what is happening. i believe it was last monday or tuesday. mr. keith and ms. kaiser sent us a fairly -- a fairly long stipulation. we look to the that over and gave them our response. end of last week. that fact was included. i did not say, if we -- the commission does not need to hear from ms. madison or ms. williams. we have not fle

kelly williams? >> probably no relevance. chairperson hur: how is she different from ms. madison, if at all? >> i do not know if ms. mattison has will and testament. the sheriff has

kelly who only got three here. >> i thank the chairman. ms. stoner, two things, and i'm going to ask you one of them, and very quickly, mr. pool the reason i ask is because pennsylvania -- i think you're familiar with the movie "gas . land." yes? >> i'm sorry, familiar with what, sir? >> the movie "gas land?" >> "gas land." i am somewhat familiar. >> okay. on may 11th, roy sennic, spokesman for the regional epa office tested 59 wells in demic and found the fracking had nothing to do with the contamination of the water. and he says this set of sampling did not show levels of contaminates that would give the epa reason to take further action. so the conclusion would be then that the epa doesn't need to be concerned anymore with the testing, the water is safe, not a result of fracturing, nothing that's been contaminated. >> my understanding is there some limited additional sampling occurring to verify there is no public health concern, but we have not found a public health concern. >> so all of the testing has turned up nothing that would be dete

kelly and mr. kucinich raised. i want to deal first with the message ms. de rugy mentioned, the true impact of these programs. one of the things that became readily apparent that i want to press on a little bit is whether or not these projects would have been done anyway. mr. rakowich, you said you started this in 2006, you started doing this program. in fact, have actually put some of these systems on your roofs before the loan program started, is that right? >> congressman, that is true. those programs prior to this were almost entirely financed by the utilities that we in essence, you know -- they financed it at that point in time. >> you testified on the program in california. i understand that that has not

ms. berkel votes no. mr. labrador votes no. mr. walsh votes no. mr. gaudy votes no. mr. ginza votes no. mr. kelly votes no. mr. cummings votes aye. mr. towns votes eye. aye. ms. norton votes aye. mr. clay? mr. lynch votes aye. mr. conley votes aye. mr. davis votes aye. mr. welch votes aye. mr. murphy? ms. speer votes aye. >> mr. kucinich. >> am i recorded? >> i vote aye. >> you raare not, sir. mr. burton votes no. mr. mchenry votes no. >> does anyone else seek recognition? aye.. murhpphy votes >> the clerk will report. vote, 14thtate ayes and 23 nos. >> that vote is not agree -- that amendment is not agreed to. we know claall a vote on the lynch amendment. >> [calling roll vote] >> the clerk will report. >> on the vote, 15 ayes, 23 nos. >> the moment is not agreed to. the question occurs on the amendment offered by the lady from new york, in which the nos prevailed by a voice and a recorded vote was ordered. the clerk will calle the roll. >> [calling roll vote] >> that vote, 16 ay commites, 23 no's. >> the amendment is not agreed to. it will now proceed to the amendment previously passed by voice vote on which it recorded vote was

kelly file has the question of the night. will attorney general holder be indicted by a grand jury. ms. megyn is next.take it with food. switch to citracal maximum plus d. it's the only calcium supplement that can be taken with or without food. that's why my doctor recommends citracal maximum. it's all about absorption. >> with hotwire's low prices, i can afford to visit chicago for my first big race and l.a. for my best friend's wedding. because when hotels have unsold rooms, they use hotwire to fill them. so i got my hotels for half-price! >> men: ♪ h-o-t-w-i-r-e ♪ hotwire.com ♪ [ male announcer ] at amway, we use the best of nature, science and research to develop and manufacture our products to the highest quality standards. ♪ in fact, amway offers a 180-day satisfaction guarantee. because amway believes the aces our products ome from... are just as important as the places they'll go. amway conveys quality. to learn more, contact an amway independent business owner. >> bill: thanks for staying with us. i'm bill o'reilly in the kelly file segment tonight, big story tonight of course holding attorne

kelly here in washington d.c. on our independent line. caller: good morning. thank you for taking my call. my question for ms. beckett is, i realize she has an article that essential is saying, there's a problem with microsoft. but, have you also researched things perhaps with the labor unions? as i understand it, afl with respect to the challenge in wisconsin, they started a program called friend and neighbors and in fact, we're going to ask for your permission to use your facebook contacts as a grassroots campaign. so, i guess my question is, it's really easy i think some times to make a point that microsoft is a problem. the larger corporations but also what do you think is happening on the liberal, democratic and you know, on that side of the house? so thank you. guest: sure, great question. one thing that's important to note is first, it's not necessarily a problem that microsoft is doing it. some people might be happy they receive targeted political ads. microsoft could disclose a little bit more about its targeting practice and really doesn't. this is not around issue about question whether you like ta

don kelly, executive director real estate fell you ration advocacy association. on behalf of the coalition to facilitate the prisoner integrity reform. ms. karen admin, president associate appraiser on behalf of the american society of the appraisers and ms. sarah stevens, the president appraisal institute. thank you all. we will begin with the testimony and without objection you're written statements will be made a part of the record. you will be recognized for a five minute summary of your testimony and with that we will start with you. you're recognized for five minute. >> other distinguished members of the committee my name is david and i am the chief program officer for the national committee reinvestment coalition. on behalf of our coalition, i am honored to testify before you today for both the consumer protection and the safety and soundness perspective in order to discuss options for improving the regulatory oversight of the stakeholders and the home valuation and housing finance industry. ncrc