ms. lauer's call starts at 7:16:11. we know ms. lauer heard 15 to 20 seconds before she decides to make the call. testified it took 25 seconds to get the phone, dial it, try jeremy's phone first, didn't work. tried hers, connect, 30 seconds. back it up another 30 seconds as to what george zimmerman was doing. now, we know that he said at a time that he didn't know that he had to protect his story that he said he had gone to the circle. makes sense, i would submit. and coming back with that little baby flashlight because the other one was not used as an impact weapon. this flashlight on his key chain that he had. he had this and it was on. you'll see the pictures of, you know now, i think, the pictures of the darkness that night. one is stunning in that if you sort of see here's the field of flash and then beyond it is almost like this black wall. it was that dark. yeah, he had his flashlight with him and he had it on. and if that's evidence of tracking mr. zimmerman, let the state prove that to you. so, we know. we don't know. evide

ms. lauer's call, the 911 call. really, ms. lauer, what does she say? she didn't see anything. she stayed inside. i think at some point in that phone call she's telling her husband to be -- i think they're married now, jeremy weinberg, jeremy, get away from the window. get away. don't go out there. the bottom line is she recorded it. what does she say before the actual recording, before she called the police she heard something going on out there. because, see, this wasn't like the defendant claims. that out of the blue the victim just kind of attacked him and knocked him to the ground and he started beating him. no, this started, i would submit, farther down. but it didn't start right at the "t" where the defendant claims it occurred. ms. surdyka. you heard from her, too. you've got the vantage point in terms of where her place was. my recollection was she's got a cat. i think his name was leo. who's got a ledge there. she was looking out. she was reading. she got up. she looked. she had a good vantage point. she did observe something. and what does she tell you? that in her o

ms. lauer's townhome? >> yes. >> so if we were to use ms. lauer's townhome as the focal point, you would look out her front door and look just to the right to see george zimmerman's truck, where it sat that night? >> that is correct. >> can i have a moment, your honor? >> judge: yes, you may. >> we've been listening to testimony via video link from elloise dilligard who lived in the twin lakes area. she says she was a friend of george zimmerman's. she knew that he was a member of the neighborhood watch program in that area. the defense team are just taking time for a brief discussion. they've been talking about the direction she took when she entered that region following the incident. lisa, what is the value of elloise dilligard's testimony to the defense? >> well, she said in kind of a weak way that it was george zimmerman's voice that she heard on the call. it was a light male voice, that's how she identified it, and she's talking about the positioning of george zimmerman's truck. and that's significant because the question is, did he park

ms. lauer's 911 call. do you know what i mean when i ask you about that? >> yes, i do. >> it is a tape that includes in it some screams and a gunshot. have you heard that tape? >> yes, i have. >> we have it available. the jury has heard it dozens of times now. i'll only play it for you if you need to hear it again. do you have a memory of it such that you remember listening to it and forming an opinion as to who you heard? >> yes, sir, i do. >> if you would just tell me the setting or the circumstances around the first time that you heard it. >> i believe the first time i heard it, it was on the third floor of this building. it was in the state attorney's office. i was there. i was put under oath. they asked me some questions. as i was getting ready to leave, they asked me if i would mind listening to this tape. i said, certainly. so they took me in a fairly small room where there was a computer. they provided me headphones, and they reminded me i was still under oath and would i listen to it. i said, yes, so i listened to it. then they asked me, did i rec

is ms. lauer on a street that comes off of retreat view circle? >> if i'm visualizing exactly where you're talking about, i believe her condo would be facing retreat view circle, yes. >> okay. how did the front door, if i walked straight out her front door, would i eventually walk right into the clubhouse area? >> no, you would have to walk down the street to the west. >> okay. let's talk then about wherever the truck was located. you saw it in reference to the crime scene. you saw it in that area. >> yes. >> okay. and we make come back to a map in a minute and see if we can show you a map of the area, but let's move to the point where you came up to the area where the crime scene was. describe what you first saw. >> there were a few people standing on the sidewalk. there were people who were closer down to where the yellow tape was, and i kind of looked around, you know, to see if i saw george because i saw his truck. after i didn't see him, then i just -- i recognized the lady from one of the hoa meetings and asked her what happened. she said --

we had the 911 call and ms. lauer, she didn't see anything. she stayed inside, i think at some point in that phone call, she's telling her husband to be -- i think they're married now, jeremy, you know, get away from the window, do something, don't go out there. but the bottom line is, she recorded it. but what did she say before the actual recording? before she called the police, she heard something going on out there. see this wasn't like the defendant claims that the victim kind of attacked him and knocked him to the ground and started beating him. no, this started, i would submit further down. but it didn't start right at the "t" where the defendant claimed it occurred. ms. surdyka, you heard from her too. we've got the vantage point of there in terms of where her place was. my recollection was, she's got a cat, i think his name is leo, who has a ledge and she was looking out, got up, looked. she had a good vantage point. she did observe something. and what does she tell you? that in her opinion based on what she saw, she thought the bigge

mcdonald, ms. lauer, she sort of without knowing about it, she gave me some pretty good information when she talked about this three-part exchange. because she was the one who said it before she had any idea about it actually happened. what she said was somebody said something, you know, blue car, red car, blue car. and, yeah, it sounded like that, a little agitated, and then the movement down. that's what got the movement down on the animation, by the way. she said t intersection, down the path and, of course, john good says it happened in front. and that there was only one perp yelling for help. that's -- one person yelling for help. that's significant because there is no evidence, none, to suggest there was more than one person yelling for help. and if so, mr.-- [inaudible] no evidence that more than one person was yelling for help. and she was talking about her knowledge and lack of knowledge about the street signs. ms. moore we talked about, she heard what she heard, and she saw what she saw. by the

it may not be as to ms. lauer but the witnesses -- you have to understand what's in trial. >> okay, i will explain that to him but i don't want you by your objection trying to infer to this witness how he should answer. >> exactly. >> it would be anything heard by the jury in this courtroom, either heard or seen by way of testimony or evidence introduced. that's what he means -- >> well, i'm not sure what that is because i was not allowed to watch the trial so -- >> then that's your answer. >> okay. >> so if i were to ask you does this animation accurately show what has been testified to in this trial, is your answer you don't know? >> i'm not sure what the proceedings -- what went on in court. so according to the evidence that i have received and from your office -- >> well, i'm not talking about the discovery matters and all the stuff you used initially for the first set of animations and i'm not talking about what a lawyer may have told you. if i were to ask you does this animation accurately show what has been

ms. green? >> yes, sir. i played all the recordings for him. >> okay. focusing on the 911 call we just talked about, the lauer 911 call, tell me how you played that, what volume or how the setting of that occurred. >> i can't recall the number as far as the volume went, but it was audible, relatively clear. as clear as i had. it was played off of a -- i believe off of a cd. it might have been digital, e-mail. i don't quite remember. it was played, and it was audible. >> okay. and what was mr. martin's response? >> emotional. understandingly. i let him listen first. >> oi'm sorry? >> i let him listen first before i asked anything. >> okay. and what did you ask him? >> i believe my words were, is that your son's voice in the background, or i think i said it a little differently than that. i inquired as if that was, in fact, his son yelling for help. >> and what was his response? >> he -- it was more of a verbal and nonverbal. he looked away and under his breath, as i interpret it, said no. >> did he ever ask that the tape be played for him again that time? >> i don't believe so. >> did he ever evidence to you a