ms. merchant. ms.lis took full opportunity to prejudice the defendants and then comes along later in a pleading and says it wasn't designed or intended to be at the defendants at all or the defense counsel, which with all due respect is just nonsense. the purpose of that was to get public sympathy, public empathy for what ms. merchant had already alleged in her motion. now, that was a violation of the professional rules of conduct. it was a violation of 3.8g. there's no question about it. it wasn't in response to anything that was said. it was a public statement, extra judicial for the purpose of make ago comment upon the defendant. >> it would be in sfons a motion that was filed. >> it wasn't filed in response to a pleading. it was filed in response to a motion, and the motion were allegations made. if ms. willis wanted to respond at that point, she could have said the facts of the matter. instead she misstated what the situation was, took advantage of the opportunity, the ethical violation. and the e

ms. merchant when the relationship started. ms. merchant says that's what i and ms. s, a couple hours later, she says willis and wade met while both were serving as magistrate judges and began a romantic relationship at that mr. bradley responds, no, municipal court, thank you. he doesn't suggest she is wrong other than magistrate and municipal court. we have that in evidence. what does bradley do? he knows he has put himself in a position and if he testifies truthfully on the witness stand, your owner is in a position to be able to find that both willis and wa lied. what does bradley do? you're an assistant u.s. attorney, you know how it works when you have witnesses in this situation. mr. bradley did everything he could do to evade answering questions. no recollection, could it remember, it was speculation. anything he could possibly say that would cause your owner not to believe that bradley knew when the relationship started. i suggest they were clear-cut and the truth is in defense exhibit 26. judge mcafee: if we take that view that he thoroughly impeached himsel

when this relationship started ms merchant said that's what i figured when he was married. and then this merchant says, and we're now talking about a couple of hours later she texts and says upon information and relief, willis and wade met while both were serving as magistrate judges and began a romantic relationship at that time. and mr. bradley responds, know municipal court. thank you. it doesn't say it didn't start then he doesn't suggest that she's wrong other than magistrate court municipal. now, >> we have that. it's in evidence. and what is bradley do he knows that he's put himself in a position that if he testifies truthfully on the witness stand your honor, isn't a position to be able to find if you choose, do they both willis and wade line? so what is bradley do? but you weren't assistant us attorney you know how this works when you have witnesses in this situation, mr. bradley, did everything he could possibly do to evade answering questions no recollection. couldn't remember. it was speculation anything he could possibly say that would cause your honor not to be

merchant made about me referencing his wife as line i never called ms merchant a liar. i never used those words. i don't know why she made the material misrepresentations. it could be because mr. bradley lied to her i don't know the reason so but i can submit to the court that those were material misrepresentations that were made to this court on the day a few mondays ago. as everyone was arguing the motions to quash certain subpoenas i'd also bring to the court's attention that during that motion to quash subpoenas, certain subpoenas, ms yeartie's attorney appeared. mr. partridge, and he made very clear on that zoom that ms you had absolutely no knowledge of a romantic relationship and absolutely no knowledge of cohabitation those and those with the specific references that he may so what i would submit to the court, as those are those are considered adaptive emissions that his client has made based on the statements he made because of the representations she made to him no, i let sounds convoluted. but what i would say that the court is ms yeartie told mr. partridge b

when you were addressing the claims that were made by ms cross and relations to ms merchant's representations to the court and what i would submit to the court is that all mr. bradley's representations as it relates to whether or when the relationship between ms willis and mr. wade began and whether they cohabitate it because that was a promise that was also made that he would be able to impeach the investigators as it relates to cohabitation was mere speculation, gossip, and innuendo and this is your honor the impression i got commissioned. i got then we can correct this while we're all here together, is that they mr. bradley directly overhead? third, a statement from each of these individuals that they could be impeached with. ms merchan, is that accurate >> directly overheard >> which ones are we talking about? >> well, essentially, the kind of seemed to be all of them. you'd said alan ban, young. and then the investigators hill, green and r6 could all be directly impeached by statements overheard by mr. bradley? >> yes >> in reference to your question, the unequivocal answer was yes. and

it had to do with the relationship that had been alleged and later admitted to buy ms merchant. >> she was the one playing the race card in a way to try to deflect from her own conduct. >> the relationship started in 2019. the relationship continued through 2020. the relationship continued through 2021 looking at the cell phone communications just in the first 11 months of 2021, over 2000 calls, almost 9,800 texts yeah. i don't even think love's struck teenagers communicate that much with me now, j. >> tom morgan, the former district attorney himself, and dekalb county, georgia and daytime it's great to have you here because there were several moments where you are hearing. those were all comments from the defense attorneys who are representing trump and the co-defendant it's in this case, but let me just start on that first moment there from steve sadow. that's trump's attorney. and he was looking back at when we heard from fani willis for the first time on these allegations as she made those comments at that historically black church in atlanta, which was essentially suggesting that

ms. merchant says, do you think it started before she hired him. mr. bradley said absolutely.ely is not a speculative word. that's not speculation. that's a definitive statement. >> dang, . >> they got me dog. sorry. i had to tell her. >> i honestly don't want watch any more of this. jesse, back when we were kids and we stayed home when we weren't trying to get to where we are today. there was this great show that came on. it was actors in divorce court. it was all the drama and excitement. this had none of that. this is the worst thing that anyone wants to see when it has to do with lawyers who are seeking justice. they are corrupt. all the things that you wouldn't want to see someone who's pursuing the fight for justice is so corrupted. it's like you can't get to court without this junk. it doesn't help the american people. it's wasting our day. we missed 20 minutes of cavuto. you know how hard that is for me? the judge is will take two weeks. make up your mind. were -- were they inappropriate or not? if you going to go after him, come get him. at least get some people with

ms. merchant when you told her facts about mr. wade and ms. willis' relationship? >> not that i recall. i've testified to what i did know so i can't recall -- pete: it was a lawyer -- it was the best lawyerly attempt you could say of him saying i have no idea. even from that you could tell the straining of the realization of, hey, it's pretty tough to deny something started beforehand. will: this will all end where we began with off the wall and the judge saying he'll rule on this in two weeks. he could potentially remove nathan wade, fani willis and nathan wade, pete and remove the entire prosecutor's office because they've thrown them way behind fani willis and i'll say this, he could dismiss the indictment. if it is held that nathan wade was hired improperly, not through the process required by fulton county. pete: so much of the case is predicated on the case being made and fani willis built the architecture around, if she goes, the whole thing could go and that's why this whole thing matter sos much. there's a lot of pressure on the judge by the way. these things are very political

ms. merchant's representations to the court. what i would submit to the court is that all of mr. bradley's representations as it relates to or when the relationship between ms. willis and mr. wade began, and whether they cohabitated. that was a promise that was made, he would be able to impeach the investigators. it was mere speculation, gossip and innuendo. and this is, your honor. >> the impression i got, and we can correct this while we're all here together is there bradley directly overheard a statement from each of these individuals that they could be impeached for this. is that accurate? >> directly overheard, which ones are we talking about? >> essentially there kind of seem to be all of a sudden of them. you had said allen, young, and then the investigators, hill, green and rich, could be directly impeached by statements heard over mr. bradley. >> the unequivocal answer was yes and no. when your honor is looking through the text messages, i would submit to the court that the text messages don't even say or indicate what was represented to the court in relation to the good

ms. merchant represented to the court that mr. personal first-hand knowledge basically of it all, of everything. and that he would be able to basically be an impeaching machine. you're on a him as the star witness when you were made by m. cross in relation to miss merchan's represcourt. what i would summit to the court is that all mr. bradley's representations of it relates to when the relationship between miss willis and mr. wade began and whether they cohabitated. that was a promise that was also made, that he would be able to impeach the investigators as it relates to cohabitation. it was speculation, gossip, innuendo. >> the impression i got is that mr. bradley directly overheard a statement from each of these individuals that they could be impeached with. is that accurate? >> directly overheard -- >> they actually seem to be -- all of them could all be directly impeached by statements overheard by mr. bradley. >> yes. >> in reference to your question, the answer was yes. messages, i would submit to the court that the text mes

ms. merchant and mr. bradley. and the text messages, [indistinct] just date. s from miss merchant. miss merchant says, do you think it started before she hired him? bradley, who we are now a note from defense exhibit 39 has been texting with miss merchant for a number of months. this is not the first time. this is months within the communications between the two. mr. bradley says, absolutely. now, absolutely is not a speculative word. that is not speculation. that is a definitive statement. and bradley eaton unprompted as this -- says this and unprompted is important to get started when she left 38 office office and was a judge in south fulton. it goes on, miss merchant says, or she -- it started when she left the d.a.'s office. the appropriate emoji or whatever one would call it to say it was like. and then street ready said, they met at the municipal court, c.l.e. conference, again, unprompted. he is now definitively telling miss merchant when this relationship started. miss merchant said, that is what i figured. when he was married and then miss merchant say

herself to go to a historic >> black church in atlanta, having not responded at all to the motion ms merchant's client, roman, and she made what we now call the church speech. it was a calculated determination by ms willis too prejudice the defendant and their counsel. how by making an issue out of the fact that the person that was challenged in the roman motion was black this was a big moment. i mean, translation, he's saying she played the race card. now the jury things that everyone is against this particular group. and here's the issue. >> did you think that was compelling at all? but the idea of the jury pool being tainted, did that play? >> i don't think so. i don't think that that's an argument that holds any weight. i do think that that's what they want to try to put in the public out to the public is that this is a race issue. and quite honestly, i think when he starts to mention that it was a black church that's not really relevant to anything, only what she says is actually relevant. and i think that they're just trying to muddy the waters with that argument. i don't think it holds m

ms. wells fargo? it's now called the merchant's exchange building. and that was a site of the first african-american owned bank in san francisco. its president, a brother henry collins was one of the wealthiest black leaders and owned a lot of land in the city. there is a lot of city history around and if i was a smart person i would get myself a spran and do a san francisco black history tour, you think it would work? is theres a lot of floor to see right now. yes yes yes. we're working on it. you know, covid reek havoc on san francisco and oakland and all near by sdaoez. but you know, that waunz the first time, uh-huh, san francisco was destroyed by fire, not once not twice but seven times in between 1849 and 1851. if you use your imagination, can you imagine the people there having to build the city all over again? seven times. and each time the people rebuilt, we tried more and more methods and high-tech methods to prevent fire. 1906 earth quick, once again. it happened in 1989 with the earthquake. we've got to learn from our history and we need

ms. wells fargo? it's now called the merchant's exchange building. and that was a site of the first african-american owned bank in san francisco. its president, a brother henry collins was one of the wealthiest black leaders and owned a lot of land in the city. there is a lot of city history around and if i was a smart person i would get myself a spran and do a san francisco black history tour, you think it would work? is theres a lot of floor to see right now. yes yes yes. we're working on it. you know, covid reek havoc on san francisco and oakland and all near by sdaoez. but you know, that waunz the first time, uh-huh, san francisco was destroyed by fire, not once not twice but seven times in between 1849 and 1851. if you use your imagination, can you imagine the people there having to build the city all over again? seven times. and each time the people rebuilt, we tried more and more methods and high-tech methods to prevent fire. 1906 earth quick, once again. it happened in 1989 with the earthquake. we've got to learn from our history and we need

been shifted by several years, as the merchant was informed by the ministry of industry and trade and the rostec state corporation. we are talking about superjet 100, mspplies. how it is reported that the reason is that the aircraft do not have time to undergo certification, since their characteristics do not correspond to those initially declared, for various reasons. so the ms-21 became almost 6 tons heavier due to domestic materials and new systems. as a result, the range and altitude of its flight were greatly reduced. the ministry of industry and trade told rbc. there are no examples in the world of how russia is now replacing imports with aircraft. need onboard. equipment and engines , aviation materials, all in the shortest possible time. yuli, that’s all for me. yes, marin, thank you, it was marina pimenova with an economic review. in the gas sector , the number of victims of an incident that occurred during the distribution of humanitarian aid is growing. according to the palestinian ministry of health, 112 people were killed and another 760 were injured. it all happened the day before, as hamas claims, the israeli military opened fire. for p

merchant during the georgia senate hearing on this. watch. >> do you have reason to suspect or can you confirm whether or not ms. willis or mr. wade were coordinating with the biden white house in the course of this investigation and prosecution? >> one of the other things i did was an open records for the white house access and we have records that ms. willis and the mayor of atlanta were the -- meeting with the vice president. >> this record chias shown on the screen shows fani willis was a visitor with the potus, i people vice president of the united states in >> yes, it was. >> what was the date of that? february sometime of 2023? >> february 8, 2023. >> is that before the indictment? >> yes. elizabeth: looking at this, that was before the indictment. okay, so we don't know whether she was at -- why she was at the white house. we don't know -- she could have met with the vice president. it should be pointed out her alleged boyfriend nathan wade, whom she hired and paid double the salary, he billed, you know, billed georgia taxpayers for multiple meetings at white house before the georgia trump indictment. can the trump te

i'm talking to ask celine merchant and lawyer who'd nathan wade kicked off the fani willis prosecution team >> what exactly was her goal >> alaska. >> and ms men who were tortured? by the squad. phase two of their torturers in court today. those former cops who will now swap their badges for prison jumpsuit, that and more tonight, unlock codes lot i really could not wait to talk to all of you tonight i'm between these former cops in mississippi finally being sentenced for what they did to two innocent men to trump asking for absolute immunity. what we have got a lot to talk about, don't we >> well, tonight, trump >> gave us all some more insight into why he thinks he should have absolute immunity. tongue. the supreme court and a brief if they don't give him immunity, it would quote, be the end of the presidency as we know it. and would irreparably damage our republic that trump talked about it just last month saying the quiet part out loud are now quiet really is these days, but it's all about avoiding being indicted there is nothing more important to a presidency that immunity because they have to be free to make decisions without saying,