ms. moore: mr. chairman, i have an amendment at the desk. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 5 printed in house report 113-476, offered by ms. moore of wisconsin. the chair: pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from wisconsin, ms. moore, and a member opposed, each will control five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentlewoman from wisconsin. ms. moore: my amendment is really rather straightforward. it preserves the ability to have the consumer financial -- the commodities futures trade commission to regulate derivatives markets will maintaining the reasonable cost benefit provisions that are already in the law. just to give you a little history, mr. speaker, as we know, unregulated derivatives transactions in 2008 precipitated the 2008 financial crisis from which this country is still struggling to recover. section 238 is not something, as i have heard earlier in this debate, that will just make it -- make it better for manufacturers or end users. i

the chair recognizes the gentlelady from wisconsin, ms. moore, for five minutes. >> thank you so much, mr. chairman. mr. secretary, it's nice to see. thank you for coming to speak with us today. i guess i was looking for your testimony, and i couldn't agree more with the formation of fsoc was an important strategy towards having all of these senior regulators and principles look at the system across the spectrum, because i was here, again, when mr. paulson came with his four-page bill saying give us $700 billion. don't want to go to that anymore. but my question is, in what -- i think a good process leads to good policy. so i guess i saw mr. roy what all, the fsoc insurance expert, dissent from the decision to designate prudential. and they were designated as a sifi. and we saw the sec push back and give -- reform. and, of course, the sec is the expert on these industries. so i guess i would like, keeping will be helpful for us to have a sense of how do you see the role of the primary regulators in these discussions? is there any deference to th

. >> chair recognizing gentle lady from wisconsin, ms. moore. i'm sorry. if the gentle lady would suspect, i'll recognize the gentleman from texas briefly for unanimous consent. >> i ask unanimous consent the letters and documents that i've referenced be submitted for the record if there are no objections? >> without objection. >> now i recognize, i apologize, the gentle lady from west. >> thank you, mr. chairman for having this hearing. i think it's extremely important to everyone. i want to raise a bit of caution to captain mulkin, mr. anderson here, i've heard you say continually that you want the bank to be reformed and not dismantled. i've clearly heard that. i want you to be clear. that this hearing is about whether or not we are going to reauthorize this bank and the authorization is going to expire in 90 days or so. and there are not many days left in this session. our chairman has been very articulate in indicating that he does not believe in this kind of government activity. we had a very passionate witness. dr. rugie, i'm sorry she had to leave

disabled -- >> i'd add on -- >> -- from the able bodied from 2.3 to 8 point -- >> ms. moore lot of your a experience and you've done you'e fantastically m your career was based on your work with tommy thompson at a time when i was a state senator.icies t i'll get in there. are you concerned that the policies you are promoting really promote women becoming a permanent under class in our county? the reason ithe ask that is bee you focused on, for example, mp, work first.work we all know sitting here, all oa us are educated in this room, c that some kind of post secondart education gives you an opportunity. work helps your income earnings potential, the strict denial and limited educational opportunitya reallyl cuts that off. the day we passed so-called w-2 in wisconsin, 10,000 women lost their ability to go to technical college and higher education.t that's my first question. yes. and you'll also recall, senator moore, that milwaukee -- tor >> representative more now but t i'm entitled to both the titles. >> i'm sorry about that, representative moore. we the milwaukee poverty

ms. moore: i rise today to highlight the tragic shortage of suitable housing on tribal lands and to call for increasing funding for the highly successful native american housing and self-determination act. now in 1996, congress reorganized native housing programs into nahasda, a block grant system administered by tribes in cooperation with h.u.d. nahasda has proven to be an extremely effective tool for tribes to help tribal members increase the quality and quantity of housing. nahasda not only works but fosters tribal self-determination and affirms the trust relationship that exists between congress and tribal nations. mr. chairman, a bipartisan coalition of members, representatives cole, hanabusa, kildee and heck and young and i introduced a bipartisan re-authorization of nahasda, which is extremely similar to a draft that representative pearce has introduced. now both bills, mr. chairman, make prudent changes to increase the efficiency of the delivery of the program dollars and i strongly bel

. >> ms. moore. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i think the witnesses for. you i have half the time they had, so i would hope you would answer my questions very quickly. how are you, mr. turner? >> so good to see you, representative moore. >> it is, it is. we do have a history, mr. turner and i know a lot of your experience you've done fantastically your career was based on your work with tommy thompson at a time when i was a state senator. and so, i do have some questions related to that. i will just give writing you. are you concerned that some of the policies that you are promoting really promote women becoming a permanent underclass in our economy? the reason i ask that is because you focused on work first and we all know sitting here, all of us are educated in this room, do some kind of postsecondary education gives you more opportunities in the job market is so while there's a lot of agreement that works are they helps your income earning potential, district denial and limited educational opportunity really cuts that off. the day we passed the so-calle

the clerk: amendment number 5 printed in house report number 113-476, offered by ms. moore of wisconsin. the chair: a recorded vote has been requested. those in support of the request for recorded vote will rise and be counted. a sufficient number having arisen, a recorded vote is ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. this is a two-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the chair: on this vote the yeas are 173. the i nayses are 239. the amendment is not adopted. the unfinished business is the request for recorded vote on amendment number 6 printed in house report 113-476 by the gentlewoman from texas, ms. jackson lee, on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the noes prevailed by voice vote. the clerk will redelingt the amendment. the chair: amendment number 6, pri