ms. murdock 3 minutes. >> good evening commissioner president lazarus and members thank you for asking me to come to the tenth pale for 170 based on the justice property owner to the answers on record the commissioners have been conversations with murdock now direct conversations the opportunity to be heard she specifically referenced it to commissioner wilson question whether you had direct correspondence with her on december 10th the proponents testified about the outreach i believe the members of this board would have granted me and my members of the board to grant the negotiation for neighborly concession prior to the permits just as our neighbors got the chance to do to correct the records as detailed in the packet i initiated 17 outreach between the receipt of the letter and the mandatory discretionary review address 8 outreach attempts after the dr approval 24 attempts in 5 months and as outlined in my packet no direct came back to me with the designing process the way the architect did for the other neighbors the spirit of the outreach attempt was also made to request neighborly a

ms. murdock is a tenant of the adjacent building that has windows facing at about exterior courtyard she express those concerns indeed the discretionary review applicant not just happened to attend they visited the apartment building twice and the courtyard away was able to stand on its own as a source of light for purposes of comparison 3 hundred square feet is the size of the san francisco in your buildings the appellant has not raised issues of appeal she explored all those are the planning commission with the discretionary review hearing was held she participated in the planning process including the filing with the dr she presented to the planning commission i'm going to turn it over to robert evans and vivian lee. >> i'm vivian lee the project manager my husband and my sons have been living here with the intention of accommodating the need of our growing family we've been completely transparency regarding our plan and have worked closely with the neighbors during before and after 311 the appellant along with the landowner were unsuccessful in the permit eased since then the appella