ms. reynold. when i clicked through the link to read through the guideline which i had done when it first came out, i think it's just so pertinent in light of the vision zero thing we were discussing. in particular on page 24 and 25 about speed and severity, and the thing that really got my attention was the vision cone page about when a driver is going a certain speed how much of the roadway they can focus on. and the faster you're going, the narrower that space is and suddenly all those pedestrians and bikes and parked cars are not even in your vision. so, that was really -- it's very compelling. so, that s

ms. reynold. when i clicked through the link to read through the guideline which i had done when it first came out, i think it's just so pertinent in light of the vision zero thing we were discussing. in particular on page 24 and 25 about speed and severity, and the thing that really got my attention was the vision cone page about when a driver is going a certain speed how much of the roadway they can focus on. and the faster you're going, the narrower that space is and suddenly all those pedestrians and bikes and parked cars are not even in your vision. so, that was really -- it's very compelling. so, that was my little paint here, i love it, it's great. my question is what will it mean if we adopt this as an additional guideline? does it mean whenever anything comes before us we can say, well, does it meet the net zero urban design guideline or is it just sort of an additional resource for staff to use when making design decisions? >> i think it's an additional resource. if you look at it, the g