ms. rogers. the first page of the three page document i sent ism -- an amended on page 5 which would address the current requirement that right now, non-residential projects with -- there are required to provide a million dollars in public art. we had a number of meetings with stakeholders and what we decided would be appropriate is if we reduced that number to $750,000 but for slightly smaller open spaces between 1500 and 3000 square feet we would require the spaces to spend at least half a million dollars on public art. the second amendment and that first amendment was non- substantive. the second is as well. building inspection was asked for language to specify that as the arts commission has the right to a charge for a minister of costs. this is the third technical amendment to cap the amount of administrative expenses, not to exceed 21% of the cost for any one project. the one policy decision we have is in the third page of this discussion, which is the planning commission recommended that t