ms. rogers. i do - i wouldn't meanwhile expect 3 the hearings would be requested i think they will be requested. also asas brohtp er's an avenue of appeal for this very issue which is the board of appeals. so this is something that is essentially creating a second issue of really a permit issue. >> thank you commissioner pearlman. >> i want to address the unintended consequences. it seems to me this the the path the thirty day period passes and some place isn't aware of the project at that time, by it goes after a section 311 then it is dred and let's say dr is upheld and the project is modified. so, now again, i'm not understanding the difference between the substantial modification define that seems to apply that any change under the planning code. so if the project were changed it seems like and your office said no. there's no environmental impact of this changed but that potentially opens the door to file for an appeal. ; is that correct? >> just back to the beginning of our story. the thirty

ms. rogers explained at&t was granted a permit to put equipment to will be paint to match the building. and the antennas will be in an equipment room in the building. the modification of the site will provide much needed and improved wireless service and it's necessary because at&t has a serious dpap and it's caused by lack of infrastructure. the gap is also, because of the dramatic rise of technology like music streamlining applications. we have got a tremendous service in at&t products. and this explains that during periods of high use there's a service gap in the area bored by lake and 7th avenues and this map - shows the significant gap area and where we were looking for our search ring for a new location >> thank you, sir. >> the gap includes sections of california street a heavy driven road. and california street is a main though fair for san francisco. this gap was confirmed by the city's professional folks. many hammond is here to answer any questions about the radio frequency. the redesign is the least intrusive means by which to close the gap. a detailed analysis which was men

ms. rogers. this is more a of a global. yesterday was the first passing of the trailing. they're not supporting this legislation >> what happens next and would our opinion be used. today you'll have our hearing and tomorrow the planning commission will hear the same item and make a recommendation. >> staff and the department will recommend both decisions and we'll lobby for our decisions at the committee meeting where they'll take public comment and it will go back to if you board. >> but we do have sequa legislation that has passed. >> it passed first reading and it needs another vote this coming tuesday and if it's approved open that read back without amendment that will be the final read on this ordinance. understood >> understood thank you. >> with that i'll take up public comment i have 3 cards (calling names). >> okay good morning commissioners erick brooks i'm with the sequa team. first, i want to clarifying on misconception. understand that supervisor wiener was aware of the original kim version and really the only difference is we're going before the e recollecti

ms. rogers explained at&t was granted a permit to put equipment to will be paint to match the building. and the antennas will be in an equipment room in the building. the modification of the site

ms. slaughter. >> thank you. thank you both. mr. rogers, what you said before about sequestration and what you said you today, i couldn't agree with you more. it has really been one of the most -- we know that scientists we're losing the from nih. at a great clip. we closed and research to i can think of something you can turn off and on. there has to be some continuity. ahead of the human genome project said they are four years away a picture from cancer. we have close off of them. people are not getting medication for cancer. so while we're on a we're working on this. all i heard everywhere i went, everybody was where in heck is this sequestered coming from and why don't you get rid of it? mr. van hollen, he's tried seven times to replace the question. i know you meant of the. you would probably know that. but i remember he is going to do away with the buffett rule, for the major oil companies, farm subsidies and there was one other -- it i escapes me at the moment but it would replace the money that we are cutting out from the sequester

but that said i hope that chairman roger's prediction or his desire and ms. lowly's desire to finish the appropriations process accordingly is done and in addition that they are able to get an omnibus provision so that we don't have too continued to postpone what all of us know are extremely difficult and complex issues. but i thought ms. norton will was the least deserving of having the measure and she began her discussion by saying that she would not ordinarily be here on acr and i made the continuing argument and will continue to make it that i don't think mr. cool -- scalise's language being self executed on the cr or the appropriations measure and perhaps we will see it again on the debt ceiling issue. but we are messing up the process. that is not unprecedented on the rules committee from either the democrats are the republicans. >> the gentleman yields back is time. i would just like to state that i do agree with the gentleman. i agree that ms. holmes norton is treated with respect and dignity but was offered a hand of thankfulness that she represented

rogers: i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from new york. ms. lowey spst -- mrs. lowey: i'm pleased to yield two minutes to the gentleman from california. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. >> thank you for yielding. for those who may not understand, all we have to do is pass a bill in the house that lets us keep the goth open and continue to argue the other issues. mr. farr: but that's not what we're doing. we're taking that bill and just loading it up with a bunch of stuff that's been on the -- been rejected time and time again, and the consequence of that is you're not going to have a bill to the president tonight and the government will have to shut down. it's a huge mistake. and it's not something we do -- we've never done it. in fact, the time i've been here, we've had big partisan disputes. our party fought vehemently against president bush's decision to go to war in iraq. we thought it was without evidence and certainly was going to cost the government a lot of money and probably not have great outcomes. we didn't shut do

rogers: madam speaker, i yield two minutes to the chairman of the state foreign opszpheet on appropriations -- ops on appropriations. the gentlelady from texas. msgranger: you for the hard work you put in the built on the committee. i rise in support of the continuing resolution to keep the federal government operating through december 15. and we hope this resolution will give the congress and the white house time to come together on a comprehensive budget agreement. i chair the state foreign operations appropriations subcommittee and funding the bill directly supports u.s. national security. the world has never been a more dangerous place. and to cutback our diplomatic activities at this time would be irresponsible. failure to get a c.r. enacted would impact key posts, including israel, egypt, jordan, pakistan, afghanistan, and iraq. this would mean dramatically reduced influence in key regions like the middle east and asia. military assistance to our allies such as israel could be affected if payments are not made as planned, potentially jeopardizing the readiness of our partners. this could also impact the u.s. jobs so the men and women produ

rogers: i reserve. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from kentucky reserves. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. mrs. lowey: i'm pleased to yield one minute to the distinguished leader, ms. pelosi from california. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from california is recognized for one minute. very osi: thank you much, madam speaker. madam speaker, i come to the floor in many ways as a mother, as a mother concerned about the children of america, as a grandmother concerned about all of america's children, but as a mother who comes, steps into this chamber and i say, this place is a mess. we are legislators. we have come here to do a job for the american people. and that job means we have to make the government run for the good of the people. we are not here to expand government, but we're not here to eliminate government. if the idea is to limit government, let's work together to do that. . what is brought to the floor today is without a doubt, without a doubt a measure designed to shut down government. it could have no other intent. its purpose is clear. and if our colleagues on the republican side deny that, then they have no idea of the graphity -- gravity of th

ms. thank you very much. i want to thank both of you equally for not only representing the minority leader pelosi, but also the gentleman, mr. rogers representing the speaker of the house tonight. i want to thank both of you. -- it will allow the american people the opportunity as well as all the members a chance to be heard from and to dig in on either side or point they would like to make. i would like to thank both of you for being here. i have no questions. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman. i thank my colleagues for being here. i have no questions. much, mr.ou very chairman. i have a lot of respect for both of you. what we are here for, we know exactly what is going to happen here. a vote for this rule to light and for this bill is for a government shutdown. there's no two ways about it. the administration strongly opposes the amendment. making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 and for other purposes. the senate acted in a responsible manner on short-term maintaineasure to government functions and avoid a damaging government shutdown. rather than taking up that legislation, the house proposes an amendment that