. >> moderator: ms. rozum? rozum:. support lifting the tax cut that exists now on social security taxes, and we need to have those making over $110,000 contributing to social security. so i support lifting the tax cap and to stablize health care costs, stabilize medicare costs i am in favor of medicare for all. multiple studies have shown that this is the most cost effective system because it takes the profits that are going right now to the private insurance bureaucracy and the monopoly profits of the pharmaceutical companies and puts them into care. so really if we're concerned about preserving these programs for the people that need them, the working people in central new york, we do need to reform how these programs work. so we need to lift the tax cap on social security and need medicare for all. >> moderator: mr. maffei? maffei: the most important thing to do is we have to make sure that we balance the budget, but do it in the right way, not on the backs of our seniors or the middle class. we should do it the way

we have to do it balancing all interests. >> moderator: ms. rozum? support a farm bill that maintains funding for food stamps. we cannot cut the program. we need a farm bill that supports organic and regional farming to make sure we're not getting too many subsidies to crops that rely on pesticides causing soil erosion, con tam nateing our waterways. i driveway with -- agriculture is new york's biggest industry, and we have to protect it. that's why we need a fracking ban in central new york, well, in all of new york, and in terms of the free trade agreements, these are very complicated trade agreements, and ultimately, we need a food system that's regional allowing our local farmers to feed local people, and we saw what happened with nasa. the exports devastated the mexico grots rail economy leading to an influx of immigrants in the u.s.. we have to be careful when our farming industry relies on exports and not feeding the local community. >> moderator: total time in the program? go to closing statements? yeah, i guess we need to. i wish we didn't h

ms. ursula rozum went public from a family that gave her thousands of dollars also to your campaign and sheid it is apparent it was given to me to halt me get to focus away from the nine. are you aware of that? was that coordinated? >> certainly not. i became aware of it to win by a staff mentioned ursula rozum had a press conference. i had no way to know who would contribute. the concern should be bloomberg and investment he has made in the race $600,000. to push an agenda that is not consistent with the upstate values. >>moderator: when you made your announcement use said it is dirty money, you do the obvious implication in your opinion that a vote for ursula rozum is a vote for ann marie buerkle. do you see yourself as this boiler? rozum: i give voters a choice. even though last couple answers mine are very different from the there candidate. our electoral system makes people go crazy a vote for a ursula rozum is about 4014. and makes people want to game the election by giving hundreds of thousands of dollars or a couple of thousand dollars. we need instead runoff voting to allow people