ms. sander: we are colluding. ms. conway: she will answer your questions afterwards. >> white house press secretary sarah sanders also spoke to reporters outside the white house, calling the mueller investigation complete and total exoneration of president trump. ms. sander: i thought for sure kelly would have an answer to all of your questions and no one would be here. reporter: [indiscernible] ms. sanders: well, i frankly disagree with you and so does the attorney general and deputy attorney general. the report said unable to make a decision that went over to the department of justice where they did make a decision. the attorney general followed the legal process, he worked with deputy attorney general who has been involved since the very beginning of this two-year absurdity and they made a decision that there was no obstruction, so that makes it a complete and total exoneration. i don't know any other way to look at it when the whole purpose of this investigation was to determine whether or not there was collusion a

ms. sanders: senator whitehouse, ou might want to vote on this. enator enzi: wyden number 2. >> i would vote aye. mr. wyden. the clerk: mr. whitehouse. nays airman, there are 11 and 9 yeas. senator enzi: amendment is defeated. and brawn number 1 and i think there was agreement on a voice vote earlier. senator sanders: i'm going to vote no on that. senator enzi: those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. >> recorded no. senator enzi: raise your hand if ou want a recorded no. the clerk: mr. chairman -- sorry. senator enzi: on that amendment has been accepted. kaine number 2. senator kaine: this deals with fund on border security. we can still do with border security but puts ap condition we should not use d.o.d. funds for a nonmilitary emergency. senator enzi: i ask my colleagues to oppose this. it restriggets how to use defense spending to protect our country. senator kaine: i would like a recorded vote. senator enzi: the clerk will call the roll. the clerk: mr. grassley. mr. crapo. mr. graham. mr. toomey. mr. johnson. mr. perdue. mr. brawn. mr. sc

ms. conway: you would have to ask his team why that is. welcome, capitals. hometown team. reporter: [indiscernible] sarah sanders. ms. sander: we are colluding. ms. conway: she will answer your questions afterwards. >> white house press secretary sarah sanders also spoke to reporters outside the white house, calling the mueller investigation complete and total exoneration of president trump. ms. sander: i thought for sure kelly would have an answer to all of your questions and no one would be here. reporter: [indiscernible] ms. sanders: well, i frankly disagree with you and so does the attorney general and deputy attorney general. the report said unable to make a decision that went over to the department of justice where they did make a decision. the attorney general followed

ms. conway: sara sanders, we're colluding. she'll answer your questions afterwards. >> the house is in recess, members will return this afternoon for work on bills dealing with venezuela. tomorrow, a vote on whether to override the president's veto of a measure terminating his emergency border declaration. follow the house live here on c span when they return. and this afternoon, our coverage continues of the american israel public affairs committee annual conference with remarks by secretary of state mike pompeo. senate minority leader chuck schumer and house minority leader kevin mccarthy. that's live starting at 4:30 p.m. eastern, online, on c-span3 and with the free c-span radio app. >> tonight on "the communicators," from capitol hill, democratic senator edward markey of massachusetts and republican congressman greg walden of oregon join us to talk about net neutrality, privacy, mergers and big tech companies. >> if you want us to preempt california how strong is the privacy law? >> all 50 statesing with throg put on the

you've had bernie sanders, the senator, on the show saying a woman he knows, ms.ays he has no reason not believe her allegations of inappropriate touching that she says were made in 2014 by vice president joe biden. does this become disqualifying for him? he has not officially declared he's running. >> i think it shows the perils of waiting and lingering about making a decision about whether to get into this race. the longer that he waits out there, the more scrutiny is applied to him and his record, especially as these voters are getting a look at all of the other options that they have available to them. it also shows this kind of contrast that biden will be faced with within his own party, a party that has been dramatically changed in the era of me too. ly say that i have been reporting in new hampshire and iowa and south carolina following all these candidates, and every time i ask a voter about what they think of joe biden, almost to a tee they say, i love him so much, i just don't want him to run. part of that is they feel personally invested in his legacy.