ms. schultz, i have a question for you and a comment. every time i hear you guys speak about the failed bush policies, isn't it true that the democrats have held the super majority for the last three years? t so when you talk about the failed bush policies, wouldn't it be -- isn't that disingenuous because it's actually a failed policy that came out of washington? i mean, you guys have held a p super majority.gt bush couldn't have passed anything without you guys sending it to him. >> we don't have a super majority. that's not the case. we have been in the majority since 2006. when president bush was still in the majority, obviously, when you have a divided government like that, either the executive branch gets everything they want so we weren't able to steamroll the president. in the last couple of years, we have had the majority but because of the unfortunate way that the republicans haveav conducted themselves and used procedural motions and the threat of filibuster to require every single bill to get 60 votes, they've essentiallyge b