ms. scott. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. back again. listen, i'm urging you to really pass thises as it currently is. ~ i spent a good bit of this weekend thinking about it. i think sometimes we tend to beat thing to death. i think this one has been beat to death quite enough. i don't see why we can't have deadlines. and while i understand the cpmc because i have a serious interest in that, and i'm glad that the ceqa process made that much better, i think [speaker not understood] the booker t. project as well, i think the ceqa process serves us well, except that because of the timelines and because there's no clarity about those timelines, there's just no way that you can really figure on doing affordable housing, supportive housing, projects that benefit this community without it costing you hundreds of thousands of dollars more dealing with an honorable ceqa process. and i know you have no control over the state process, which i intend to weigh on as well. but for this one, an administrative process that makes sense that has clear gui