ms. snider for your suggestions seeing no more public comment it's closess. this is a list of pilot designs it will be in discussion i certainly appreciated ms. snider's suggestions how far what we push the programs the corridors we've identified are the right ones but can we push the envelope maybe we can have meetings now until june. one the process and the second piece is funding and if there's a need for funding we should understand what it costs it will save us money and lives to prevent the accidents we saw today. i know we have another board of supervisors committee meeting that will be starting shortly so i'll save the rest of my questions for another time but again, it's great to have the discussion over the next of you months call item 5 >> item 5 education and public awareness this is an informational item. >> we have john the transportation planner at sfmta to present but before we do that i want to give supervisor yee a chance to make comments. >> i'd like to delay my comments and wait for the presentation. >> okay. great. thank you >> good after

ms. snider for your suggestions seeing no more public comment it's closess. this is a list of pilot designs it will be in discussion i certainly appreciated ms. snider's suggestions how far what we push the programs the corridors we've identified are the right ones but can we push the envelope maybe we can have meetings now until june. one the process and the second piece is funding and if there's a need for funding we should understand what it costs it will save us money and lives to prevent the accidents we saw today. i know we have another board of supervisors committee meeting that will be starting shortly so i'll save the restf

ms. snider.y question is about governors of states, it in particular the governor of north carolina who intervened a group that was suing a company that had a feel of coal ash in the rivers. how can the governor intervene and do that? or does he have the power to do that? thank you. guest: so the clean water act -- and what was at stake and that spill did not entirely fall under the clean water act. the clean water act deals with directed discharges into the water. and it does cover a little bit of the fines relates to the fines that can be associated with that, but there are also other laws up there that deal with the handling of hazardous waste including coal ash, as you mentioned. there is a separate regulatory proposal there. but a lot of these laws embrace -- the phrase is "cooperative federalism." so you might have the federal government or epa setting an overall standard within a a state but then they delegated. every water covered under the clean water act, it is under the state is a this