ms. sullivan, please. thanks. >> and welcome. >> i am reading into the public record testimony relevant to this appeal. i attest and affirm the following statements are true and accurate and within my personal knowledge. the following is testimony that he will ward myers wrote for a 1919 hearing in montgomery county maryland. i was an intervener in the dc sun kate case along with the natural resources defense counsel. a rule making order to expedite the development of dense if if if id -- dense if id -- so-called small cell by the cff. the order attempted exempted all of these facilities from two kinds of previously review. historic preservation review under the preservation act and environmentally review under the national environmental policy act, that's significant. on august 2019 the court of appeals for the district of columbia vacated the rule making order the legal effect vacating the rule-making necessary means the prior rule was reinstated and any actions taken on the basis of vacated rule had to

ms. sullivan. thank you. >> welcome back. i recognize you. >> cultural action network. i just want to clarify. we keep hearing 18 percent affordable housing whereas a mission threshold should be 25 percent or above. but this is not 18 percent. this is an aberration of a state density bonus project where they calculate the percentage on the base before they add all the units. so to be clear, i mean, this is like eight affordable units out of 60. okay? so it's not 18 percent. and even 18 percent is way lower than the mission needs. these large state projects that come under state law you heard about -- oh we can't do anything about adus because the state says we can't. we can't do anything about this because the state says you can't. you're widening authority is being constantly narrowed by these state projects that are, these state laws that are one size fits all. and that one size does not fit san francisco. you've got to find a way to push back on some of this stuff and particularly in the mission we can't have, you know projects that are done with such low affordabili

ms. sullivan. thank you. >> welcome back. i recognize you. >> cultural action network. i just want to clarify. we keep hearing 18 percent affordable housing whereas a mission threshold should be 25 percent or above. but this is not 18 percent. this is an aberration of a state density bonus project where they calculate the percentage on the base before they add all the units. so to be

ms. sullivan. thank you. >> welcome back. i recognize you. >> cultural action network. i just want to clarify. we keep hearing 18 percent affordable housing whereas a mission threshold should be 25 percent or above. but this is not 18 percent. this is an aberration of a state density bonus project where they calculate the percentage on the base before they add all the units. so to be clear, i mean, this is like eight affordable units out of 60. okay? so it's not 18 percent. and even 18 percent is way lower than the mission needs. these large state projects that come under state

ms. sullivan. thanks. >> hi. thanks for having me here. i moved to the city when i was 22 years old. i lived here for the next 17 years. currently i live in paluma. i'm one of the founders of my street my choice where we did ban putting these towers in residential areas successfully so i beg to differ with mr. verizon. what i want to put on the record here today is there was a california law ab57 that banned these towers by any firefighters in the state. you can't put it near a fire station. so that means they're perfectly safe. so the firefighters won but we didn't. these companies can't get liability insurance because they don't want to insure them because they're not comfortable being able to do that for the liability. so why isn't that being mentioned by mr. verizon? so this is what i want to draw your attention to today. i attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. this is from an october 24, 2019 e-mail to thomas argon the health officer at the department of health. at a sonoma planning commission meeting a consultant from ct

state department employees, so far sullivan is shown in fluency with diplomacy that is delighted his colleagues in the state department. the washington examiner, by ms. miss martin calm and experience, three crucial ingredients in leading the u.s. mission to russia. in wall street journal, by ambassador thomas pickering, one of the nation his most distinguished career diplomats he said secretary sullivan, i've come to respect on sullivan his judgment, his balance and his good sense and his open-minded approach to how to deal with the difficult forum relations problems our country has. mr. chairman, you may also have seen this very long letter of distinguished national security executives and former diplomat and military officials and secretaries of defense and brother positions who are all endorsing secretary sullivan his and mastership to russia. is a relates to the responsibilities, with regard to the new position for which he has been nominated, deputy secretary salva currently leads onto ongoing u.s. russia dialogues on counterterrorism and strategic security and has also played a key role numerous bilateral issues relating to the u.s. russia re