bob beck you have your work cut out for you and ms. tilly i've already scaled the world. thank you >> thank you for the exiled kind words i think bob and i have our marching orders. our next speaker needs no introduction whodunit travel at least in the region this person has been a friend for many years i've horrid him for some time i've had the opportunity to get to know him not only on this partnership but, of course, our stunning parkway project. on this team they've been true partners helping to secure 77 money and streamlining all the process including the environmental review process under the new delegating authority and please join me our director t p. (clapping.) >> thank you tilly. good morning it's a pleasure to be here as we start the construction of a project that not only includes practitioner but access to the treasure island. we're proud of the bridge you see behind us and we're proud of this project that puts a world-class new connection to the treasure island that was independent of the bay bridge project it was due to the collaboration between will the

ms. chang >> chair and executive director tilly chang. >> regarding that it's the third street feasibility study i want to note if came up in our county wide transportation update and last year community members raised a question about the project evaluation in our analyzed it has high benefits in terms of high ridership did harassing also has high costs business recognizing that requires more costs and the different sliechlt impacts that analysis was considered to make the next phase to again put that in context you'll see us look at the 19th avenue i think line as part of the geneva corridor study and the analysis that's being evaluated with the embarcadero sector and this is to put them on an even footing so the sfmta can look at them comprehensively. it was looked at by community members by supervisor chiu's support >> thank you to tilly changing reminding us of the work that's been done. so supervisor kim and i'm sorry this is a comment not a question this is on the second street plan again happy to supporting this through prop k it's increased for pedestrian lighting and i want to pu