ms. vargas had no authority to disregard. we do believe that there is in error, but my client is therefore bound by the injection. >> thank you. mr. cooper. and i am sorry. >> mena please the court, my name is david boyce. we represent the plaintiffs. let me begin by interim one of the court's questions with respect to the effort to get a mandate requiring the attorney general to appeal. that was simply a one-sentence denial. the court did not provide any further analysis. i also would like to just be certain their record is clear that permanent injunction that was issued by judge walker relates only to the official defendants, and persons under the control or supervision of those defendants. >> sewed judge walker was wrong about the register -- so if judge walker was wrong, and she is not bound by the injunction, correct? did a that is correct. >> if she is not bound by the injunction, how does she have standing? >> we do not believe she does. we believe the decision makes absolutely clear that individuals like mr. argus, ev

ms. vargas had no authority to disregard. we do believe that there is in error, but my client is therefore bound by the injection. >> thank you. mr. cooper. and i am sorry. >> mena please the court, my name is david boyce. we represe the plaintiffs. let me begin by interim one of the court's questions with respect to the effort to get a mandate requiring the attorney general to appeal. that was simply a one-sentence denial. the court did not provide any further analysis. i also would like to just be certain their record is clear that permanent injunction that was issued b judge walker relates only to the official defendants, and persons under the control or supervision of those defendants. >> sewed judge walker was wrong about the register -- so if judge walker was wrong, and she is not bound by the injunction, correct? did a that is correct. >> if she is not bound by the injunction, how does she have standing? >> we do not believe she does. weelieve the decision makes absolutely clear that individuals like mr. argus, even if

ms. vargas had no authority to disregard.error, but my client is therefore bound by the injection. >> thank you. mr. cooper. and i am sorry. >> mena please the court, my name is david boyce. we represent the plaintiffs. let me begin by interim one of the court's questions with respect to the effort to get a mandate requiring the attorney general to appeal. that was simply a one-sentence denial. the court did not provide any further analysis. i also would like to just be certain their record is clear that permanent injunction that was issued by judge walker relates only to the official defendants, and persons under the control or supervision of those defendants. >> sewed judge walker was wrong about the register -- so if judge walker was wrong, and she is not bound by the injunction, correct? did a that is correct. she have standing? >> we do not believe she does. we believe the decision makes absolutely clear that individuals like mr. argus, even if she were the actual clerk, which he obviously is not, would not have standing

ms. vargas had no authority to disregard. we do believe that there is in error, but my client is therefore bound by the injection. >> thank you. mr. cooper. and i am sorry. >> mena please the court, my name is david boyce. we represent the plaintiffs. let me begin by interim one of the court's questions with respect to the efforto get a mandate requiring the attorney general to appeal. that wasimply a one-sentence denial. the court did not provide any further analysis. i also would like to just be certain their record is clear that permanent injunction that was issued by judge walker relates only to the official defendants, and persons under the control or supervision of those defendants. >> sewed judge walker was wrong about the register -- so if judge walker was wrong, and she is not bound by the injunction, correct? did a that is correct. >> if she is not bound by the injunction, how does she have standing? >> we do not believe she does. we believe the decision makes absolutely clear that individuals like mr. argus, even i

ms. vargas, was bound by the injunction? >> no your honor. >> reporter: those defending prop 8 say judge walk her no right to strike down the measure. >> the place for this question to be decided is the place where it was decided, by the electorate through the democratic process. >> reporter: the debate also focused on the fact that no one representing the state of california was present to argue the appeal. both the governor and attorney general declined to continue participating in the lawsuit and people taking up the anti-same-sex marriage issue haven't said whether they have the right to be there since they weren't named in the original suit. >> what we really have here then is we have an attorney general and a governor with no ability to nullify acts of the people and then by not appealing, they, in fact, do t. >> reporter: now, standing is about who would be harmed or impacted by a particular court decision and that person would have a right to appeal t today, one of the pro-prop 8 lawyers was representing a deputy cle

ms. vargas had no authority to disregard.elieve that there is in error, but my client is therefore bound by the injection. >> thank you. mr. cooper. and i am sorry. >> mena please the court, my name is david boyce. we represent the plaintiffs. let me begin by interim one of the court's questions with respect to the effort to get a mandate requiring the attorney general to appeal. that was simply a one-sentence denial. the court did not provide any further analysis. i also would like to just be certain their record is clear that permanent injunction that was issued by judge walker relates only to the official defendants, and persons under the control or supervision of those defendants. >> sewed judge walker was wrong about the register -- so if judge walker was wrong, and she is not bound by the injunction, correct? did a that is correct. >> if she is not bound by the injunction, how does she have standing? >> we do not believe she does. we believe the decision makes absolutely clear that individuals like mr. argus, even if sh