ms. wagner. >> okay seeing no other questions mr. rose your reporter. >> on page 10 of the report the increase of $3 million that is payable to by the airport to the san francisco terminal not to exceed $18 million not to exceed fwi under the proposed moiftsdz agreement is 2 hundred plus for the auto matted control in shown in table 3 and the balance of 768721 for the increased passenger services we recommend you approve that resolution. >> thank you, mr. rose seeing no questions open up for public comment anyone wish to comment on item number 2 seeing none, public is closed. >> i'd like to make a motion to approve the resolution and send it forward with with a positive recommendation to the full board. >> thank you we'll take that without objection. >> i do not from real estate okay madam clerk call item 3. >> did resolution arthur's the realize of $3,000 thousands square feet for a 5 year term to expend the monthly with the remaining of 2014-2015 of 39 thousands. >> good afternoon claudia the director of real estate for our conside

ms. wagner i don't believe there's any questions so we'll open up for public comment anyone wish to comment on this item okay seeing none, public is closed sure supervisor tang. >> thank you just a quick question for clarification from the airport is i saw there a was in conjunction with the affirm mansion a request for release of $30 million are we taking that action today. >> when we came before the board last year to get our permission to appropriate the proceeds of the airport bonds this particular project was the funds associated with the plot seven hundred were placed on reserve pending the environmental work since the department has found that cargoly exempt this will be firmed by the board invocation and i'll come to you on wednesday to request the release of the money and the report will be on the specifics of the $30 million related to the project. >> thank you. >> okay. >> no other questions we have a motion to - >> with that i'd like to make a motion to affirm this with a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> item 5 to authorize the fire department to

ms. wagner. seeing no questions at this time, mr. rows, why don't we move to your report police. >> yes mr. chairman, on page 18 of our report, the 700 development project is estimated to cost [inaudible] and that's shown on table one. on page 19 of our report, we note that plot 700 budget for the airport's grand transportation unit and bussing facility of 35.2 million is 16.4 percent more than the original estimated budget of 30 million 204,000 and $900. that budget is driven entirely by an increase in the utility cost and the grand transportation budget. the airport plans to reward a contract subject to the process. and the airport expects the project to be complete in november of 2015. we recommend that you do release the requested reserved funds. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. seeing no questions at this time, why don't we open this up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item 6? >> (indiscernible) >> all right. through the chair, i thought we were releasing the $30 million last time. so i have no questions. at this point,

ms. wal in her -- mrs. wagner. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady is recognized for four minutes. mrs. wagner: i thank the gentleman for yielding and for all the work that he has done to protect life and religious freedom. mr. speaker, i rise today to express my strong disapproval of religious discrimination in the district of columbia's local government. mr. speaker, one of the founding principles of our great country is a freedom to worship without government interference. our forefathers fought and died for that liberty. and i stand before you today to make sure they did not die in vain. the law passed by the d.c. city council attacks the core religious beliefs of faith-based organizations schools and pro-life advocates. under this law these groups could be forced to pay for health services that are in direct conflict with their fundamental religious beliefs. under this law, a d.c.-based nonprofit whose sole mission is to end abortion could be forced to pay for abortion services. this is not only unacceptable, but stands in direct opposition to the constitution and federal law.