cooper and ms. weis said. there is a question of how much is specific to exact details of a site versus what is generalized. i think the examples they gave in terms of shadow, wind, and aspects of transportation are good examples. do you have enough recreational space? that is assessed on a whole. air quality is a mixed bag. some is of the regional character. some are cite specific. where things are appropriate to be site specific, in terms of this very narrow band of development -- we gave that narrow level of detail. traffic on the bridge all congeals on to the bridge. the development program is going to drive that result, not the sighting of a specific program. one further thing -- the question about discretion, i think the response was not totally correct. discretion is only in response to evidence. evidence here is there are two primary components of this project that are changing. one is the governance structure. the other is the financing mechanism. in terms of the physical changes since the cnr was dis