ms. williams. he says, "so, ms. williams in a very real and direct sense, you are being released today because the constitution has prevailed, because your counsel has fulfilled her constitutional obligation, and because the united states is also fulfilling its constitutional duty to strike hard blows, but fair blows, in the pursuit of justice. so, ms. williams, i share that thought with you as you leave here today, that your freedom today, conditioned as it is by the orders that i have entered, is a result of the prevailing of the constitution. and i'll leave you with this final thought, ms. williams. the judge closes with this -- "the constitution prevails here today and the constitution will always prevail in this country. we'll stand in recess." courtroom deputy rises, the court is in recess, and the court note says the proceeding adjourned. thus concluded, the federal detention hearing today for a 22-year-old woman from pennsylvania, whose court-appointed counsel admitted today that she was part of the crowd tha

ms. williams: absolutely. we've been working for everyday americans. senate ing in the state until the congress comes in. know how they'll keep their lights on, how they' they'll pay their rent. to me because they don't know where their will come checks from. -- unemployment checks will come from. they worked every day. they weren't hit, getting the resources they needed to stay in their jobs. for jobs were shut down one reason or another, and leadership in this country has failed them. republicans who continue to hijack this process and not giving people on the support e help and the they need to get through this global pandemic. and absolutely this is the down payment. i cannot wait to get to congress so that one of our first acts is sure ish the job and make that american people are getting what they need so they can our nue to thrive in society in the midst of this global pandemic until we can get it controlled. >> representative ocasio-cortez said she's not ready to be but she said people to move on. susaned to representative delbene who is coming

ms. williams. of -- of public scrutiny, your mother has stepped forward and promised to serve as a third-party custodian. and you heard my questions to her, did you not, ma'am? the defendant, i did, your honor. the judge, and you heard that

ms. williams, i want to note for you that one of the reasons you are going home today is because in a desperatee in the glare of public scrutiny, your mother has stepped forward and promised to serve as a third-party custodian. and you heard my questions to her, did you not, ma'am?" the defendant -- "i did, your honor." the judge -- "and you heard that your mother has promised that if there are violations of these conditions, she will report them to me, and she has made to promise understanding that if she breaks that promise, she

ms. williams? >> i feel wonderful. good morning and thank you for having me back. >> always. i know.ople about the name and how you came about it. >> lifetime and i, we were on a call, big conference call, lots of smart people and they gave me some ideas for names and i said, all these smart people on the phone, nobody would believe that we haven't named the movie but the movie is done, so is the documentary. i said, oh, what a mess. and they said, perfect. >> i said, what? and they said what a mess. i said, well, that actually is perfect. so it's turned out to be quite messy but quite a learning experience for me. learning about myself and also hopefully people, robin, in between the tears and the laughter and i can't believe this is what she survived. hopefully they'll learn a few takeaways for their own lives or else just be entertained. >> let's follow up on that. you've had a lot of challenges over the last few years. it's been no secret at all so what exactly did you learn from this experience? >> that i'm fearless and fearless to a fault. you know, i'll walk right to the edge,

ms. whitley. >> yes, chair williams. i ask if you have questions about numbers, i am here and happy to answer them. we did not provide the detailed backup. if you are trying to do the math at home, it can get complicated. they are not subsidies $4,000 per person. we built in -- what would a 36 month three year subsidy cost over the three year period with intensive work force subsidies for the client? $200 per client per month as well as additional intensive case management. those services are more intense than the rapid rehousing model than in the flexible model closer to $3,000 per person. i think it is $2,800 per person per month. that is really to recognize that it is a limited time subsidy, and we want to provide intensive case management and work force services. then, you know, as i believe director has said. at that one year marker, if folks are not successful we could transfer to psh or ongoing subsidy or extend the subsidy. it is an effort to invest in people upfront and help them during this crisis sort of help

ms. friedberg: you speak tirelessly and with clarity and conviction. we have time for two final questions. one from a viewer named williamho wants to know if you have ever had a thought about retiring or settling down. mr. ferencz: [laughter] no. no. i thought, what would be more interesting than what i do or more important? playing golf? no, i think that is quite ridiculous. i'm never going to retire. we are making progress. i'm not discouraged. ms. friedberg: the final question, as you described to us, you have been told no a lot in your 101 years, from your first attempts to enlist, initial plea to get prosecutors assigned, people telling you what you are doing is impossible, but the answer no has never stop you and you believe in something. what fueled you to keep fighting? what words inspire you that could maybe inspire us? mr. ferencz: i will give you three words which will sum it up -- law, not war. if you are in a war, the way that wars are going, it's going to kill everybody. you want to build a system of law which deters people from trying to settle their disputes by forceful means only. if we don't have a cour

ms. stefanik will vote yea on h.r. 335. as the member designated by representative william timmons of the state of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. timmons will vote yea on h.r. 335. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative correia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative correa will vote yes on h.r. 335. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird from indiana, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote no on h.r. 335. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. ocasio cortez of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. ocasio cortez will vote nay on h.r. 335. as the member designated by ms. pressley of massachusetts, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. pressle

william safire reported george w. bush said i want my second inaugural to be my freedom speech. he used the word freedom 27 times in that speech. what is your reaction? mseri: given where we were at that point, we were knee-deep in the iraq war, after 9/11. it made sense. freedom as an outsized, almost mythic quality to it. it very much was in the air, and it became a point of derision because whose freedom are we fighting for, and what we were doing in terms of the iraq war. after 9/11 that tone of speaking for freedom from terrorism here but also for democracy abroad was really important for president bush. i also want to say what struck me -- i had not gone back and listened much to those in a long time but going back to that first one, it was before 9/11. it is a beautifully written speech. parts of it sound so different from what we might hear today. there is a line where he says it is the american story, a story of flawed and fallible people united by grand ideals. today i do not know if you would hear republican say the american story of flawed and fallible people. there is an undercurrent today between politicians about what is the american stor