. >> other questions for ms. wong before we move on commissioner wynns. >> thank you. i appreciate all the information and the work that went into this i still have concerns about the and honestly my opinion about action on this tonight this is not going to happen we're getting this much more money i'm hoping it says so deputy superintendent lee that all the time we're going to try to buy down. >> i'm sorry commissioner wynns we're focusing on questions. >> that's the question buying down the money the formula basically so i'm presented to vote for this although i think there are things i want to continue to pursue and the militant lingual pathways are one of the main things i mean, you said something up here that says okay we're putting money into staff people for intermediate grades and middle school pathways even though we don't have enough students for them now and preserving that those will be good enough i'm presuming that, too that more students will want to continue than in the past we've both had work pathway that ended at third grade but that were not robust

. >> okay, ms. wong, please come forward. >> good afternoon, supervisor avalos, supervisor tang, my name is candace wong and i'm applying for seat number 8. i am the patch here of the childhood planning advisory councilor, worked in the city my whole career basically, over the last [inaudible] years, i worked in early childhood education, i think through my work, i'm currently the director of the california child development programs with the low-income investment fund which is a community development financial institution, interestingly enough, i bring a very broad and deep perspective that's different that would be valuable to the group. i work through a community development lens in which we look a lot at how we look at building whole communities and hearing some of the speakers this morning, through that work, trying to -- how are we planning for, i think the perspective i bring is i try to look at least three to five years out if not more, we know we're going to have a growing population in san fran

ms. wong, do you have any other clarification here? >> mr. chair, it is our department requested the department of mayors' office of housing to provide our office with a copy of all the actions previously taken by employees of the city and there were no list provided. therefore, our office requested that the department remove that language so that the board is approving the amendments without that language. it's a standard request from the clerk of the board. >> supervisor tang. >> thank you. so for example, regarding the portion that says authorizing collection of fees, to ratifying and approving any action with a note and a project, so it seems these are pretty subsequent items removing from this, do we need to remove anything else from the rest of the resolution? i understand that potentially there may be other items coming before the board related to this. >> this will be the final action before the board. >> this is the final action. okay. so i guess from the city attorney, is there anything else from this that we would need to remove? >

ms. sullivan would be great on the committee as well, and then i was -- based on the work i did with candace wong to create the office of early childhood education, she was part of the planning effort, so i thought i would want to support her for seat 8, sandee blechman for seat 9 and seat 7 is the difficult part, and yes, ms. herrera-autumn has like wonderful experience within the child care setting and to be able to apply to a place where you work directly with students, you work directly with teachers, you work with the families and you also have an understanding of the setting and all the requirements that are in the field as well and that is an incredible per specie to have on the body, and then ms. davidson has an amount of experience as well, it would almost be a coin toss, and my hunch would be to focus on center based care that kathie herrera-autumn experienced, that came loud and clear with someone that would be a strong asset to the advisory committee, so i propose that we support her for the seat. >> alright, i'll publicly say, i'm fine with that. >> so, if we -- our motion, if that's