ms. workman. ms. workman? what kind of tenant is your client envisioning potentially renting the space? >>> well, we actually have gene coe here who is the broker who can talk to you more specifically about that. but they are looking for a very i think conventional office tenant for that space. is that okay if gene responds? >>> just a couple examples. the tenants that we're looking for are creative tenants, office tenants, but, you know, they can be technology, they can be architects. they can be designers. but they're not particularly noisy tenants. they're the same tenants as any other tenants in any other office building. >> what might be the likely size of the work force in that place? >>> probably between, you know, 50 to 70 people. >> i don't think architects can afford south of market. [laughter] >>> you're right about that. >> thank you. >>> did you want me to speak a little more about the tenants? >> that answers my question, thank you. >> mr. duffy, mr. sanchez? mr. duffy. >>> commissioners, the permit went through the building department, went through the review for building

ms. workman. ms. workman? what kind of tenant is your client envisioning potentially renting the space? >>> well, we actually have gene coe here who is the broker who can talk to you more specifically about that. but they are looking for a

ms. workman, can you address the conditions listed under acoustic plan and verification whether you're in agreement with them, disagreement? >>> you're referring to the charles salter -- >> uh-huh. >>> the silence conditions under acoustic plan and verification, you address use restrictions, but you didn't address acoustic plan or verification. >>> if it's all right with you, i'm going to ask the salter consultant to come up and talk about those. >> i asked them earlier and they didn't have an answer. ~ >>> i think now they can address it. >> okay. >>> sorry. joe nodeker also with salter. ben and i worked on this. the question about future verification has actually been addressed. we can give you actually copies of our proposal that's been signed by our client already that authorizes us to come back and do two things. one is observe the installation of the vibration isolators that will be installed on the existing and the new e-pumps to make sure they're installed properly. and second, while we're there, to the extent that the residents will allow us to enter the units, we'd be glad to an

ms. workman? >>> [inaudible]. this is the letter that we actually got from [speaker not understood]. we have included e-mails from december 18th when we were outside the country when we got notified of the suspension of the permit. and the d.r. application actually cited enclosure of the deck as a [speaker not understood] remedy based on confrontation from an architect. when i contacted the architect and said, on what basis did you get the consultation? you didn't review our plans. she said who is [speaker not understood] was the question she asked me. the i said the laid you gave professional recommendation to. she said i never gave professional recommendation to anyone. we're not going to be hauled back into the country for another month and a half. once we come back mayor's office and a half later we find notification related to the building department and this entire process are actually going to the old address because the assessor's office has not atedhe address. by the time we come through figuring out what notifications are being sent to us or the d.r. process, we've done eve