i had emailed the mta board members and none of them responded. two paraphrase in today's language, those who save one life save the world. i hope we can be part of that group and get some sort of interim program going if there is some money left in the budget somewhere. enke. >> okay, just for your information if you want to speak about what you spoke about, right now, please wait for general public comment. that one had nothing to do with this report. sorry. >> this report serves and points out derivatives of the topic. first of all, i want to point out how the police department demonstrated top class self-control when a female driver of an automobile was driving very recklessly. hitting numerous cars, and actually caused damage by hitting a pedestrian. by the same response, none of the cops fired one bullet, which could have resulted in the death of the female victim, or perpetrated defendant that was driving the vehicle that was in front of the tenderloin police station. my point is, this is an example of how you need an increase the mental he

if you have any other comments, that you want to send incoming you can e-mail the mta board with any further suggestions at sfmta.com. >> were going to open it up to the public. >> herbert weiner? >> yes. >> herbert weiner, these are the qualities i would like to see. for one thing i think the new executive director should be a transportation professional. i think that goes without saying. these are some of the qualities i would like to see from my own personal perspective. i believe that the executive director should be able to take issue with his managers, for one thing. he should be able to clash with them, bite them and even dismiss them. this has not been the case, so far, and i think this has been one of the reasons why we are in the mess we are in right now. he should also take issue with this board. these clashes should be public. they should not be in private only. we should be able to witness these differences and provide some input. we have something to say about this. i think what has been the case as you have rammed through everything, these meetings have been a dog and

board of supervisors. [inaudible] and it was rejected. this led the mtaiderable research and decide on policy that the public stop should only be for geographical location only. therefore, the name should be rejected. number two, the board of supervisors adopted chinatown rose pack resolution without community input nor knowledge of the above mta policy. number three, widespread support of over 10,000 signatures have been at selected from around san francisco to support chinatown the board of super tight visors and mta have been led to believe this is only one segregated group, this is not true. also, the largest chinatown organization, in chinatown, supports chinatown only. perjured herself in order to acquire abm unit, this is an two a legal offense. i repeat, there was never a community meeting and on this issue. ask of the and individuals. you will see for yourselves, most, if not all of them, want chinatown only. i want you to know, mta had a meeting and all of the merchants that i surveyed, rose her hand and said chinatown only. a lot of them work s

mta as well, he was former president of the southeast commission number. as well as the san francisco chamber of commerce leadership for him. he also president of the board of community development center. a former member of the housing authority. most recently a member of the hunters point shipyard. he was a community activist. he will be missed. i think we share that with the commission, i just wanted to make sure i shared that again, to extend his service area with that, i have nothing to add. i want to remind folks that the community session is tomorrow. i can send information with regard to ucsf and uc berkeley list and, they are not intending to produce a report. they are there to listen to the community, what they would like to be reflected in the report. it is more like a listening, not an interaction. that would be held at the site office at 6:30. >> there is a question by a member of the commission on the report? >> no area -- -- no. >> the next order of business is item nine jik, commissioners questions on matters area. >> on the report for the resolution, number 12-2019. i noticed on page 3 where it lists the community business organization,

daylighting, is something we passed recently at the board of supervisors to implement programs that would make it easier. i don't know what the words are. i was asking mta to daylight as many intersections as possible to come up with a plan to intersect daylight - how many was at? i asked her daylighting in a year. was it 500 corners? i don't remember. >> good afternoon, chair e. it was 500. we wanted to make sure that we could commit to something we could actually get implemented. are aspiring to at least that. we are limited by resources and capacity >> i did not great i just could as we saw with the tenderloin project it, in did we will get at least that type of result, if not better. i since that there would parking is impacted. you know, it would personally respond to people that think it is better dave parking spaces. the point is here on the future, for a future item that strategy be read this committee. on tuesday, the board of supervisors passed which expanded telematics vehicles is an advanced x speed baking and so forth. with the significant buffets including increasing safety. since 2017, more than 40,000 of our cities, telematics will be ex