thank you, just to compare, say this commission to the mta commission. mta commission weighs in a lot on design, perhaps more than they should, they rely on public input, perhaps more than they should, because it slows down processes a lot. they would have, i would say the burden of community outreach and often use it as an excuse to not make any forward progress. the other thing they use as an excuse to not make forward progress is the department of public works, because they say things are done. the way they're done, and we have a hard time dealing with their engineers, we all need to reimagine streets. there's a century old legacy of focusing on car centric culture that continues to kill people. the mta has failed to meet its vision zero goals, despite the involvement of the commission and the public and everything else, i would say that the commission's, opinions on this are, unfortunately, compromising public safety. the fact is that the data shows that the mta alone is not able to save lives. and until they are, public works should be working as ha

thank you, just to compare, say this commission to the mta commission. mta commission weighs in a lot on design, perhaps more than they should, they rely on public input, perhaps more than they should, because it slows down processes a lot. they would have, i would say the burden of community outreach and often use it as an excuse to not make any forward progress. the other thing they use as an excuse to not make forward progress is the department of public works, because they say things are done. the way they're done, and we have a hard time dealing with their engineers, we all need to reimagine streets. there's a century old legacy of focusing on car centric culture that continues to kill people. the mta has failed to meet its vision zero goals, despite the involvement of the commission and the public and everything else, i would say that the commission's, opinions on this are, unfortunately, compromising public safety. the fact is that the data shows that the mta alone is not able to save lives. and until they are, public works should be working as ha

mta accessible services. at the public utilities commission, we also continue to partner with the mta and the county transportation authority to monitor the proceeding having to do with tmc, transportation network companies, access for all apps, which is in a pilot implementation phase. proceedings are ongoing, and we are currently focused on on-time and reduced wait time performance of tnc's. federal legislation, there is not a lot up now in federal legislation, but we do continue to monitor the air carrier access amendments act of 2023. there are two bills, one in the senate, that is 545, and one in the house of representatives, hr1267 that would require the department of transportation to seek consultation from the access board to redefine minimum accessibility requirements related to boarding and planing equipment, seating accommodations, captions, and audio descriptions of in-flight entertainment and communications. individual video displays, visual and tactile announcement and appropriate storage for devices to prevent damage. this bill would do a lot. this bill will also insure the accessibility of all gate

to that project and moving to district did do alamany it on and this is sf public utilities commission and mtaho worked to create providing safe construction to the interchange into itself farmers' market to the san bruno by the neighborhood transportation prop k at the request of commissioner ronen and pleased to provide the design to help this project that has been an active program grants for construction thank you to commissioner safai for your leadership in the community and been patient and a lot of mreblths dealing with some of the site conditions so again, thank you for the partners for your hard work and district 9 has seen the condition for sfmta and public works and bernal heights neighborhood opportunity by the ta neighborhood program at the request of commissioner ronen and the enhancement at folsom street and at for 21st and the bernal heights are one speed table at concreting sent and one crosswalk those enhancements will help safety for people walking and biking and thank you to sfmta and a few more a lot of deliveries this time. 38 and geary commissioner chan and deputy direct

so, the fellows e udes, mta, the ks port, public utility commission, the library, department of emer supportive housing, recreation and parks, department of public health, and talked office of supervisor melgar. there was a great deal st. theyalso met with the community alliance sability advocates and they of the public and received 82 including 45 people who are electric wheelchair or mobility device users.and what they found from their research is, pein both indoor outdoor proposed locations. there is support for throughout the city, and more community outreach would for making sure that all the possible locations are in alignment with goals of particular projects. the key take-away from the fellows search are that because of their interest from several different city departments, it would have a lead agency to resolve challenges regarding ownership ov turn it into a cohesive program, rather then across the city without somebody carefully coordinating and monitoring how is going. there is int in pursuing legislative action and looking for support from the board of supervisors. [ind

. >> i like to offer that the biking and rolling plan by the mta has not ted to this commission. proven wrong, but at point my understandin a year of community outreach, if more, they yet to discuss what that really looks like. i argue new business should include a call by public works to request presentation from the people who are putting th to discuss it, especially given the fact it is a currently curb to curb program and does not include any new designs for sidewalks. to that same end, i offer this commission should have some sensitivity to small wheel access. i'm excited to see there is a vacancy and look forward putting in a application for it because i missing from this space. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. it does not appear we have any other inperson commenters and there are no urther callers who have requested to speak on this item either. >> thank you. we'll goes into closed session and do not anticipate further commission business conducted out of closed session so staff doesn't have to hang around if they dont i will note, as i mentioned we wil

commission departments and city suspend funding to corrupt non profit that waste our money ge in fraud against the taxpayer. protect small businesses siness districts from abuse by large city departments like the sf mta i will insure that sfusd has great public schools and envy of the nation. ■za lowell high school graduate this is very important. thank you your consideration and let me prove to you that the city that knows how, l knows how. >> hi, i'm corn and welcome to doing building san francisco, we are doin special series, called stay safe, how you can stay in your home safely and comforta that a is coming and there are things that you can do to d your home. let's take a look at that. >> here at the spur urban center on mission street in san francisco talking about staying in your home after an earthquake. i have guests today, pat buscavich and s dog, harvey and david, and both structural engineers and we want to talk about things that you might do before an earthquake to your home to make it more likely that your home will beha bitable after an earthquake, what should we do? both and maybe even important non-structural things. >> you hear about how to prepare an earthquake kit and brace your b

commission approval. however, the master permit will still require approval from the mta and fire.here was no getting around that, but we have vastly simplified that as you can see in the chart there. and i really want to thank the cbds for their willingness to take on responsibility as the holder of these master permits, as well as to their commitment to build sustained relationships with arts and culture and small businesses and community based groups. this goes beyond authorizing an entertainment zone. as i said early earlier, what we are doing here is the hard work of rationalizing, overlapping permit permitting regimes and getting buy in from the cbds to take leadership in each of their geographically distinct areas, as i said earlier, 20 events per, activation area, a minimum, a maximum of five years, of each master permit, and the new entertainment zones that are authorized, are set forth, hold on a second here. i'm getting a little ahead of myself, in selecting the activation zones, the master permitting program does take advantage of the new state program for entertainment

commission approval. however, the master permit will still require approval from the mta and fire.here was no getting around that, but we have vastly simplified that as you can see in the chart there. and i really want to thank the cbds for their willingness to take on responsibility as the holder of these master permits, as well as to their commitment to build sustained relationships with arts and culture and small businesses and community based groups. this goes beyond authorizing an entertainment zone. as i said early earlier, what we are doing here is the hard work of rationalizing, overlapping permit permitting regimes and getting buy in from the cbds to take leadership in each of their geographically distinct areas, as i said earlier, 20 events per, activation area, a minimum, a maximum of five years, of each master permit, and the new entertainment zones that are authorized, are set forth, hold on a second here. i'm getting a little ahead of myself, in selecting the activation zones, the master permitting program does take advantage of the new state program for entertainment

as i said at the august 1st commission hearing, take 1600 square foot house over a garage, create a new unit in the garage and allow the retention of the curb cut. since the mta allows parking in driveways on the street but not on the sidewalk. if the supervisors remember the financial feasibility studies from when the housing element was approved, the key word in assessing the addition of 2 to 3 units at an existing lot with a single family home was challenging. the financial feasibility study for the upzoning was scheduled to be published last november, but that hasn't happened yet. under sb 423 ministerial approval is possible for 2 to 9 units of market rate housing. two units is a major loophole. like the current section 317 demo calcs in the staff's report, they acknowledge the economic reality that any second unit is very likely to be absorbed by the larger unit, but unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect worl. so this legislation is pretty good. and thank you for it. and i think we should consider expanding it citywide. thanks a lot. and thanks again for number two. that was really great. jane morrison turned me down for a job when i first came to s

want to speak to is i've known lydia since she got involved with the art commission, and she moved on to historic preservation and mta, and now with planning, and i think i don't believe in if president more and lydia are the two competing candidates to chair, they bring different things to you as a body, and i can appreciate the new members. what it would mean to you, however, i think and this is i don't believe in dividing and conquering women i support. i've been to many of your hearings in the past. i know commissioner moore has been very respectful to historic preservation and community input because i've worked with west westwood park historic preservation issues and japantown historic preservation issues. on the other hand, i've also worked with lydia. so on a very personal level, because i've known her over the period of time. while she has provided service as the expert on the art commission, as the architect and the historic preservation, and i think many of you already know, i don't need to say this. women today are still struggling to be recognized as professional architects. you look at the major firms,

as i said at the august 1st commission hearing, take 1600 square foot house over a garage, create a new unit in the garage and allow the retention of the curb cut. since the mta allows parking in driveways on the street but not on the sidewalk. if the supervisors remember the financial feasibility studies from when the housing element was approved, the key word in assessing the addition of 2 to 3 units at an existing lot with a single family home was challenging. the financial feasibility study for the upzoning was scheduled to be published last november, but that hasn't happened yet. under sb 423 ministerial approval is possible for 2 to 9 units of market rate housing. two units is a major loophole. like the current section 317 demo calcs in the staff's report, they acknowledge the economic reality that any second unit is very likely to be absorbed by the larger unit, but unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect worl. so this legislation is pretty good. and thank you for it. and i think we should consider expanding it citywide. thanks a lot. and thanks again for number two. that was really great. jane morrison turned me down for a job when i first came to s