they didn’t sleep, they worked, they worked, and yesterday they said so little that knocked out the mtbews comes. they raise more than two fighters and actively respond, including american m-77 howitzers, when western models appeared, accuracy increased. not at times, but very noticeable, very noticeable. i think, probably, nato members are helping with the electronic guidance system there. well, that's exactly the intensity. they shot down my fire during these months, nevertheless, yes, yes, as they themselves say on the radio superiority with us. big now, losing in an honest artillery duel, the nationalists are trying to beat in a different way stealthily curious objects. we see near the artillery positions. here are the remains of the parachute, with the help of which the enemy throws here containers filled with explosives and striking elements. how it works the parachute hangs on a tree, the lines pull out the pin and the shrapnel scatters. well, judging by the seals and markings of a nato production, another danger is a sabotage group to the enemy’s position. here, no more than 10

, milan, they are capable of destroying any pmp or bmp of the russian army, not to mention apcs or mtbseeled armored vehicles, there are features of tigers and so on and so on but in connection with the fact that in your specific place there may be a statement and well, it seems to me that there is no point in not shooting at the bmw because when you started to put two bmps, the machines may not go further because they see that there are anti-tank divans, that is, the situation is real for three weeks, unfortunately, the deceased comrade was noticed, he was divided into a russian tank, for others, they simply saw everything, it was the first pansion of a tank attack, they simply ran away without er, they brought him down, and therefore, if there is an opportunity to establish a precedent, then it is not necessary to maintain the number this should be done as for other means, for example artillery, but we can say that the soviet anti-aircraft guns hold up well enough to artillery fire, again. my experience here is that i see how the bmp-1 received three close hits with 5-7 m 155 mm shell

, milan, they are capable of destroying any pmp or bmp of the russian army, not to mention apcs or mtbs-e wheeled armored vehicles, there are tiger features and so on and so on but in connection with the fact that you may have a week in a specific place and well, it seems to me that there is no point in not shooting at the bmw. because when you managed to put two bmws, the machines may not go any further because they see that there are anti-tank divans , that is, the situation is real for three weeks. unfortunately, the late comrade of his unit was spotted they slept russian a tank for others, they just saw everything, it was the first batch of tank sighting, they just ran away without er, they built it, yes, therefore, if there is an opportunity to install a front, then it is not worth saving jeremy parts, it must be done, as for other means, it is, for example, artillery, but you can say that soviet anti -aircraft guns hold up quite well to our artillery shelling. my experience is that i see how the bmp-1 received three close hits of 5-7 m 155 mm shells, that is, it was very close, bu

of destroying any pmp or bmp of the russian army, not to mention an armored personnel carrier or an mtbwheeled e-e, wash the equipment there, features tigers and so on. so on. but in connection with the fact that you may have a statement in a specific place and well, it seems to me that there is no point in not shooting at the bmw. because if you managed to put two bmws, then the tanks may not go any further because they see that there are anti-tank divans that is, the situation is realistic for three weeks. unfortunately, the late comrade of his unit was seen burning a russian tank for others. they just saw everything. it was the first pansion of a tank attack. they simply ran away without er -er. it is necessary to do as for other means, for example, artillery, but we can say that the soviet anti-aircraft guns hold up quite well to archeological shelling, again. my experience here is that i see how the bmp-1 got three close ones hitting 5-7 m with 155 mm projectiles, that is, being very close, but then they left, that is, even if the conditions are large enough, i will try the armor o

didn’t sleep, they worked, they worked, and yesterday they said such news that they knocked out an mtbing to everything, including american howitzers m-77, when western models appeared, accuracy increased. not at times, but very noticeable, very noticeable. i think, probably, nato members are helping with the electronic guidance system there. well, that's exactly the intensity. they shot down my fire , but this month they crushed it all the same, yes, yes, as they themselves say on the radio superiority with us. big now losing in a fair artillery duel at the soyuz to beat in a different way stealthily curious objects we see near artillery positions. these are the remains of a parachute, with the help of which the enemy throws here containers filled with explosives and striking elements. how it works the parachute hangs on a tree, the lines pull out the pin and the shrapnel scatters. here you go, judging by the seals and markings thing. this is a nato production, another danger is a sabotage group to the enemy's position. here, no more than 10 km to help the sentinel, the dog ryzhik, wh