so i am a member of the mtmac, and when we had our meeting there was another motion that we had that did not pass an four of us voted for it. six voted against it. the mpcac urges the board of directors and the board of supervisors to ensure that imp honored by having the t.s.p., this presentation, provide for mitigating projects -- mitigated transit projections where they occur and not rely on a fee alone to mitigate aggregate delay impacts. i think i got that right. so what that means is that we're saying, the four of us -- this is what it means for me, is that i don't think the e.i.r., the transit analysis of the e.i.r. should be eliminated. i do not think that's a good tradeoff. i think that needs to be kept in. ceqa is a good law and i don't want to see this gutted. i don't want to see members of the public lose an opportunity to weigh in on the transit impact of a project to their particular neighborhood, and that's what this project is doing. this is a good idea if you include the -- if you bring back the transit impact analysis and require developers to do that. and if you do