syria and the united states quite calmly transferred chemical weapons from the arsenals of muammar gaddafire supplied in the interests of actions directed against the syrian government, so the use of weapons of mass destruction is not some kind of taboo for nato, but naturally there is such a regime as the ukrainian one, which can be used for some attacks against russia, including the use of nuclear weapons in the future, this scenario cannot be underestimated... as for the returned to the territory of our country.

united states quite calmly transferred chemical weapons to the militants from the arsenals of muammar gaddafi, that is. training conducted jointly with our tactical nuclear weapons countries. colleagues, showed the high readiness of our military personnel, their highly trained ability to perform these tasks. therefore , we need to state the fact that today we are ready to use these weapons when necessary, but it is better, of course, not to come to that. nato expansion is not an isolated case of deception. the united states, as a key country in the alliance, has this position. historical experience only says that they have always been partners for us, but friends have questions, but this is probably different, i was ksenia lebezeva with you, see you in the next program. union dialogue belarus and russia are celebrating the thirty-second anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations. a new step in partnership with the african continent , belarus and the kingdom of eswatine will implement a number of joint projects in agriculture, trade and medicine. let's open it. new horizons, bela

war, in your opinion... they transferred chemical weapons to the militants from the arsenals of muammar gaddafiical shells were supplied in the interests of actions directed against the syrian government, so the use of weapons of mass destruction is not some kind of taboo for nato, well, naturally there is such a regime as the ukrainian one, which can be used for some attacks against russia, including using well the future of nuclear weapons is. as for the tactical nuclear weapons returned to the territory of our country. the training, conducted jointly with our colleagues, showed the high readiness of our military personnel and their high level of training ability to perform these tasks. therefore , we need to state the fact that today we are ready to use these weapons when necessary, but it is better, of course, not to come to that. nato expansion is not an isolated case of deception. the united states, as the key country of the alliance, has the following position: if you don’t deceive, you won’t survive. therefore, before trusting the west, you should think 100 times about the consequences.

huge deal, because it was such a great grade for me. [ laughter ] but the title of my paper was "muammar gaddafiwhat about this gaddafi guy over in libya? [ laughter ] this guy's raising hell. i'm just in sixth grade here. but scollins really takes me back to that era. >> seth: scollins is so bad, that gaddafi would write one about scollins. [ laughter ] >> i like this scollins guy. >> seth: yeah, why am i so bad? >> he should be in my cabinet. >> seth: this is so exciting because this is a sprawling western epic, directed by kevin costner, who's the guy you think about when you think about sprawling western epics. what was it like to be directed by a guy who does this better than anyone? >> yeah, i mean, it was just a high point in my life and just one of the best things i've ever gotten a chance to be a part of. but, yeah, i mean, i don't know about you, but i think i've got -- getting to be an older actor, sometimes i probably don't listen to directors as much as i should. you know, just like, "okay, that's a good note. no, i should try that. yeah, okay." [ light laughter ] you know, because

the united states quite calmly transferred chemical weapons to militants from the arsenals of muammar and gaddafishells were supplied in the interests of actions directed against the syrian government, so the use of weapons of mass destruction is not some kind of taboo for nato, well, naturally there is such a regime as the ukrainian one, which can be used for some. use this weapon when necessary, but it is better, of course, not to go so far as to do so. nato expansion is not an isolated case of deception. in the usa, as a key country of the alliance, the position is this: if you don’t deceive, you won’t survive, so before trusting the west you should think 100 times about the consequences. historical experience only says that they have always been partners for us, but there are questions as friends, but this is probably different. and i was with you. yaxenia lezeva, see you in the next program. in politics, alexander grigorievich has already become a figure in scale that goes far beyond the scope of the post of president of belarus. nominally he is responsible only for his country. in fact, tha