and, as commissioner, as president muhammadu said, this meeting were focused on our progress towards our goals for student outcomes. but we know there are concerns the students are bringing here and sharing. so we'll make sure to find time to follow up and to continue the conversation outside this meeting. again because your voice matters and we're here to serve you. so looking forward to that future conversation. but tonight we're excited to focus on our progress towards third grade literacy, i also want to note you feel far, too far away. student delegate simpson, we have a couple commissioners absent tonight, and so without with that, the public comments, members of the public may address the board on any matter that is on the agenda. virtual comment may be offered at the board. president's discretion and as a reminder, board rules in california law do not allow board members to discuss comments or attempt to answer questions during the public comment time, so at that, at this time, i will call for public comment in person. please with students prioritized. i have three cards, non

um, so this is sort of a maybe follow up, uh, question to president muhammadu. um, it's amazing that we're on track. in fact, appearing to be ahead. um, and so i guess to your comment about sort of using some time to really dig in at the end of the year to say, like what works so that we can hone in and decide what to implement, to continue to implement. i'm also wondering if when we're looking at the, um, the plans moving forward is this like, can we be even more aggressive of because we've already like whatever you did, maybe it seems to be working or some of the things seem to be working. is there is there a space to actually be more aggressive, to get even more gains and, and, or alternatively , um, if, if the resources that are in place are working or are sufficient to some extent. have you all looked at whether there is any difference sort of in schools? are there any schools that are actually not at that median district wide level? and would it be appropriate to focus more resources, sort of with an equity lens to say, okay, we have x schools that are alr

muhammadu yes. seven. yes. item number two, in the matters of two matters of anticipated litigation, the board, by a vote of seven ayes, gives direction to the general counsel . okay. moving into section d, i will now begin with the land acknowledgment. we, the san francisco board of education, acknowledged that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush ohlone. who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco peninsula. as the indigenous stewards of this land, and in accordance with their traditions, the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, nor lost nor forgotten the responsibility as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. as guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. we wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the ramaytush community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. at this time, i'd like to ask for the approval of boa