are they able to speak up for anything that the mullahs disagree with? they're either jailed or killed. this is a world view the president has which is totally divorced from reality. >> well, let me -- some could say that you and other senators were interfering, in a way, with the president's negotiations when you were 1 of 47 senators who signed the letter to iran's leader saying that congress needs to approve any deal that iran enters into. did you feel in any way, shape or form before you signed on the dotted line, you've run for president yourself, that this was undermining the commander in chief before you even knew what he might be thinking of? >> what triggered it, gloria, was the president's announcement that no matter what congress voted as far as ratification of this agreement, and clearly it's so important it deserves the approval or disapproval of congress, he immediately announced he would veto any resolution from congress. that's what triggered the letter and the events. >> should it have been written to the mullahs? >> well i think that mu

the first one they will look for is the mullah because they have a hundred soldiers under them. and they are going -- their head will be on the right side. the body will be on the left side. and then turn around do a military turn, no questions, no answers and walk out and that did it. it was in the wall street journal. >> thank you. thank you for the prayer thing, too. you can never get prayers going over there. thank you. i appreciate it. >> my name is john mckenzie and we have yet another secretary of state. what is your take on the latest secretary of state? >> john kerry? does that answer your question. no, it is sort of the same thing. you have the same sort of world view. he gets there and thinks he will visit the middle east and negotiate and allyienate people and their goal was to get an a deal with iran just to say they got a deal. but when you listen to the presidents over there who live in that part of the world it contradicts our policy and how they approach it. so kerry -- i don't think he is going to be able to advance anything. i don't think kerry is strong enoug

it's the mullah regime, the bloody mullahs supporting terrorism around the world, repressing their own people. isn't the real answer trying to make ourselves partners with those people in iran who want more democratic country a more democratic country, and has not this administration passed up time and time again the opportunity to work with the people of iran to free themselves from these mullahs? >> congressman i think you're exactly right, that the actions of the regime are the problem, whether it's destabilizing activity friday in region support for terrori groups and if there abusive rights at home, which is exactly why across the board, whether it is standarding up some supporting those wore trying get greater rights in iran, whether it is working withour partners in the region continue crease their defensive capacities, whether it's pushing back on proliferation and nonsupport for terrorisms through the action wes have taken, that's exactly why we're doing that -- >> i would suggest that i give you an a-plus in terms of being able to focus people's attention on the negotiations

it's the mullah regime, the bloody mullahs supporting terrorism around the world repressing their own people. isn't the real answer trying to make ourselves partners with those people in iran who want more democratic country, a more democratic country, and has not this administration passed up time and time again the opportunity to work with the people of iran to free themselves from these mullahs? mr. blinken congressman, i think : you're exactly right, that the actions of the regime are the problem, whether it's destabilizing activity friday in -- activities in the region. support for terrorist groups, and if their abuse of rights at home. it's exactly why across the board, whether it is standing up for those who are trying to get greater rights in iran, pushing back on proliferation and non-support for terrorism through the actions we are doing, that's exactly why we are -- representative rohrabacher i wouldgive you an a plus on trying to: focus people's attention on these people's ability to manufacture the weapons. i would give you an has minus my comes to whether or not we can g

and then there's a third agreement between president rahani and the mullahs. we think that's pretty well wired. it could come unstuck as well because there are a lot of forces in iran that dislike this as much as the republicans in the senate dislike it. >> what's the b.b. factor? will it be more of the same or will he be emboldened to speak against the deal and does that make the nut harder for the president to crack? >> i think it's going to make it harder because he's got a lot of influence in congress still. >> ok. we'll be watching that. it's an amazing story. you'll be there next week. we'll find out what you think. few things give more insight into washington priorities without the actual prospect of becoming law than partisan budget proposals. who supports the troops? who wants to balance the budget, post-haste? who wants to repair bridges? who wants to scale back medicare? just listen to the way lawmakers frame all this. senator thune: it's going to be a budget that balances without raising taxes and it's going to deliver a government to the american

you don't send a community organizer to negotiate with mullahs. it's like sending me to get something off a high shelf. he is born and bred from the leafy campus. he believes if we talk to enemies they will like us and like him because he is charming. it doesn't work that way. >> we sent john kerry to do the negotiation. rowhani, they want to make a bomb and we are going we are going to turn it over. >> we are in denial about what is happening. the iranians have been clear out what their intentions are in terms of the region, israel in terms of us being -- everything that they have said has been laid on the table and president obama i'm not so sure necessarily wants to get a deal that stops iran from getting nuclear weapons despite what they say in the briefing room because none of the actions back it up. if they wanted to negotiate like ronald reagan did the end goal would be iran not having a nuclear weapon just like the end goal was ending communism. there is no end goal to stop them kind of let's continue to talk about this because it is not a

the statement is factually correct. >> it is. >> if you mullahs think you're going to get a ten-year window, if the deal is bad and we get a republican president, it's gone. >> right. >> okay. i don't know what the beef is anyway. and i do think barack obama editorial comment here, should -- any deal should be run by congress for an up or down vote, yes or no. any deal. it's not going to happen. you're right. but it should happen. this is our protection. >> but it's not the law. >> this is protecting every american. >> i understand what you're saying, but i am giving legal analysis. >> up or down lay it out. >> they're going to take it down for him anyway. >> all right. big scam going on, mostly in california but other places as well. chinese women paying as much as $80,000. the clip i'm going to show you says 60 but feds have confirmed can go up to $80,000 to come here from china to give birth. roll the tape. >> dozens of government agents filed into this irvine apartment building, all of them armed with federal search warrants aimed at uncovering three different chinese birthing ho

i warned them if the mullahs would start to worry about them selves because iraq -- iran would come into iraq and the first one they will look for it in love because they have 100 soldiers under them and their head will be on the right side, the body will be on the left side and turn around, the military turn. no questions, knowing there's a lockout here that it in "the wall street journal." >> thank you you're the prayer thing is huge. you can never get enough prayers while you were over there. thank you. appreciate it. >> hello. my name is kenny. we have yet another secretary of state. what is your take on the latest secretary of state? >> john kerry? [laughter] does that answer your question? look, it's sort of the same name. he gets there and thinks he's going to the middle east to negotiate all these things. and accommodate our enemies in iran. the goal is to get sunday with a rant to say they got a deal. when you listen to president sese or net and yahoo! just talked how it is because they are in that part of the world, it contradicts our policies and how they approach it. i just d

claims he is speaking to the young people but he is only speaking to the mullahs.general david petraeus, adviser to the president apparently despite a settlement with the justice department on having turned over classified information to his mistress but a close adviser who is being ignored given his op-ed today saying iran is the biggest threat in the middle east not the islamic state. >> there is something about being on the foreign policy team of president obama that needs to complete public disavowal of president obama and his policies. this is just the most recent, former head of the cia coming out saying obama policies in the middle east have been a disaster. if you read his answers to those questions it is a scathing account of what president obama has done in their region, squandered opportunies wh se geraldav peaeusnd thft tate had toeeryinpprriae aionsnce agn itas abt hanling cassiedand imrtant foatio as reignolicleader. not much different from hillary clinton. it is an amazing set of circumstances out of this administration. lou: this administration law-

it is the mullah regime. bloody mullahs. they are supporting terrorism around the world. suppressing their people. isn't the real answer making ourselves partners with those people in iran who want a more democratic country? hasn't this administration passed up time and time again the ability to work with the people of iran to free themselves from these mullahs? mr. blinken: i think you are right. the activities in the region are the problem. which is why, across the board whether supporting those were trying to get greater rights. working with our partners in the region to increase their defensive capacities. pushing back on proliferation through the actions we have taken. that's why we are doing this. rep. rohrabacher: i give you an a plus in terms of focusing people's attention on the negotiations dealing with the ability of them to manufacture a weapon. i would give you an f-when it comes to whether we can get rate of the threat by helping the people of iran institute democratic government there. this administration from day one, in order to -- frankly, the irony is,

claims he is speaking to the young people but he is only speaking to the mullahs. general david petraeus, adviser to the president apparently despite a settlement with the justice department on having turned over classified information to his mistress but a close adviser who is being ignored given his op-ed today saying iran is the biggest threat in the middle east not the islamic state. >> there is something about being on the foreign policy team of president obama that needs to complete public disavowal of president obama and his policies. this is just the most recent, former head of the cia coming out saying obama policies in the middle east have been a disaster. if you read his answers to those questions it is a scathing account of what president obama has done in their region, squandered opportunities. when i see general david petraeus and the fact that he had to be very inappropriate actions once again it was about handling classified and important information as a foreign policy leader. not much different from hillary clinton. it is an amazing set of circums

the president is bending over backwards to secure a nuclear deal with the mullahs.t a bomb. just as iranian backed forces run through iraq and yemen and threaten the saudi oil fields. the president's intense desire for a peace makers legacy pushes him to the peace at anything tilt to iran. who would thought that any american president would walk away from an ally to embrace a mortal enemy. that's what's happening. the tilt is real ♪ stuart: we're down. apparently there is evidence that the economy is slowing. that's what the economists are telling us. some numbers out today. we're down 160 points. the dow is back to 17849. what do we have next? moving on to the price of oil. kraft food. look at that. up 48%. that stock moving straight up there. they have a deal. a 40 billion-dollar merger with heinz. that brings together some of the biggest brands that you know. bringing them all together. i'm going to give you a partial list. maxwell house. velveeta. jell-o. philadelphia cream cheese. we're down to a half a dozen companies that dominate grocery stores all over the

why do we believe the mullahs in their desire to wipe israel off the map and destroy america? >> irwell, the statements of ayatollah khomeini are not just i his statements they are repeated by the entire iranian leadership. when you look at the statements of theea commanders of the revolutionary guard, ifth you look at the statements of other leading officials in iran they all call for the construction -- destruction of israel in one way or another. they even put the statement aboutat destroying israel on placards, on billboards which theyh attach to missile carriers carrying the missile that could hit israel. they are just opposing their hostile intentions with their growing capabilities. that is why prime minister of israel benjamin netanyahu has to be so careful and pay very close attention to what iran is doing. the stakes are the future of the jewish state. >> i goe back to and the prime minister mentioned this in a speech this week even as they areat negotiating and yelling at johnre kerry and the iranians had to be told to stop yelling at john kerry even the iranians ar

why are they trashing our president to the mullahs? i think i've 45erd a lot, but they guys have so little respect for obama. >> this is not the first time congress has disagreed -- >> disagreed -- >> you remember the 1980s when reagan was trying to -- it was because of a disagreement with the congress and the president. the treaty of versailles was is a disagreement. this happens and it's part of the deal. this they have a right to voice the disagreement. >> they have the right to voice the disagreement. they don't have the right to write to a foreign enemy on their own terms and say don't pay attention -- >> they have the perfect right to do it. they just did it. >> read the logan act sometimes. >> it says specifically says the members of congress does -- >> no, it doesn't. >> i read it. >> okay. thank you. >> it's a way to express views without doing it in this marine. >> i think it's part of the low treatment of this president. thank you john feehery, you had a difficult job here. you were the washington generals against the globet

and if the mullahs don't know yet that this is not going to be a treaty that there's no way it's goingt consent of the senate, someone should tell them that. that blows up the deal so be it, we're headed to a rotten deal be better not to have it at all. the iranians are outnegotiating president obama running circles around him -- >> but wait, mark, what about that point? i thought we were not supposed to be questioning somebody's love of country. isn't it a little hypocritical for them to turn around and say to the republicans you're traitors? >> yeah, i'm not calling republicans traitors. i'm not saying -- >> not you. but you've seen the newspapers you've read some of the comments. >> the daily news can be a little tabloidy. but there's a strategic wisdom here to undermine -- i mean rich's own magazine, the national review i'm reading here the centralization of the diplomacy of the president has been thought to -- manipulate our branches of government against each other. >> so you're not accusing tom cotton of -- you're saying he's being manipulated by the iranians? >> but wait, but r

world order can be bolstered by talking with the mullahs, as we are doing. talking with them rationally. simply walking away from the table would be bad policy. president obama should address the nation and the world and lay out what he believes is a fair deal let's see it so we he can evaluate what's in play. then congress should vote yes or no. and if the iranians don't agree to a fair deal congress endorses then draconian forces should be applied. and villains like putin who don't go along with the sanctions should be exposed. right now the world needs clarity. netanyahu spelled out the danger very well. now we need the most powerful man in the world barack obama to step up and persuade us his offer to iran would stop the nuclear madness. that's the memo. joining us you from washington dennis kucinich a democrat. here in the city "wall street journal" columnist stephens. what say blue stephens. >> it was not only eloquent speech it was clever speech because it highlighted the deal that is being hatched. >> which is, what? just so everybody, even i can und

not the iranian mullahs.aying and kept it in-house because now john kerry and others are saying you know what? if we don't get a deal, it's the republican's fault. you know that's coming down the lane. so, if the republicans could have sent it and kept it in house and said we need you confer with us because of the reasons you just stated that probably would have been a better play. >> of course it would. that's the first thing i said on the first night it came up. you don't address it to the ayatollahs. although the implication of the opposition by saying this is an act of treason, you are going behind the president is, of course, preposterous. this is not a secret letter dropped in the mailbox in a dropped somewhere you know, that an iranian agent would pick it up. this was a bloody open letter to the world. so it should have simply been addressed either to the president, the american people, to united states allies or to no one in particular and say here's our position, you have to bring in the congress bec

you've got the iranian mullah this past sunday chanting death to america. now we've got a proxy war against saudi arabia and other countries by iranian supported rebels in yemen. and then an administration that wants to allow them in the out years of this deal, the sunset years, a nuclear weapon. >> right. >> help me understand the logic behind this if there even is such a thing. >> well, the big picture truth here is that everything you see happening right now really across the middle east is directly traceable back to two things. one of those is the american withdrawal, the american withdrawal from iraq which created isis. the american withdrawal from afghanistan which even though it's been slowed now has not been slowed sufficiently. that's one thing. the second thing is our nuclear talks with iran. and it is absolutely the case that the united states under president obama is undergoing an historic and devastating realignment of our interests so that the president is now aligning america with iran. now, the very kind of minor support and assistance you s

. >>> gop to mullahs, screw the deal. let's play "hardball." >>> good evening, i'm chris matthews. in a swiftly deteriorating washington. remember the republican congressman who yelled out "you lie" during a state of the union? how about inviting bibi netanyahu into the u.s. capitol so he could undercut the president? now for the trifecta. 47 republican senators have written the hardliners in tehran asking them to scuttle the iranian nuclear talks. explode them before a deal can even be reached. telling them whatever deal president obama signs will be printed in disappearing ink and can't be relied upon once he leaves office. is this where we stand in this country where the opposition republicans will try anything to scuttle an american president's noble effort to avoid a war? michael crowley is senior foreign correspondent with politico and eugene robinson is a pulitzer prize winning columnist from the "washington post" and msnbc analyst. the senators wrote, "president obama will leave office in january 2017 while most of us will remain in office well beyond then. perhaps decades.

>> well it depends on whether the mullahs, khomeini and the mullahs -- >> snap the democrats out of it. daniel, i thought just as a political watcher, i thought that the invitation to netanyahu was wrong, but i thought his performance was strong and i thought that day as it ended the republicans were glad they did it. that was their verdict. but this letter the verdict is not that way. they don't think they should have done it now, and they know the price they're paying. your thoughts? >> there's two ways of looking at this. one is how does this play at home. they've taken a cold shower politically here and rightly so. over the letter, not necessarily the invitation to netanyahu. conservative papers attacking -- >> "the wall street journal." >> it's done terrible things for america's international standing and reputation. with allies. the most important foreign minister the german foreign minister here, you got to be reliable, you have to be taken seriously. however, there's another audience that this letter was targeting, and that's the iranians. and here i worry that for all the buff

he could lift them on his own so the sanctions he imposed on the iranian mullahs he can lift.onstitutional reform blues will you join me? judge napolitano: i will not. can i get to hillary for second? judge napolitano: i will be there with you. stuart: she appeared on in the early's list, she avoided the question about her e-mails but she managed to say this. >> is only fair to say don't use them they want to see a woman president of the united states of america? stuart: mary kissel. >> got to love hillary. i would love to see a woman president but i want to see a competent female president there are questions about hillary's competence. look how she ran the 2008 cannes and the and her record as secretary of state and what she has done with the clinton foundation with a took money from foreign governments when she was secretary of state and look what she is done with her e-mail. stuart: i am with you but there are many women that i know some of them very close to me to say i will vote for hillary. >> that is their choice and i hope the democrats put hillary up because she is a

the same mullahs who took over in 1979 are there today and their offspring. so hezbollah is an arm of the iranian regime, a creation of the iranian regime. and by the way, something we didn't talk about as well that would require a whole other talk is iran and hezbollah's presence here in the western hemisphere. iran has its tentacles throughout south america central america. his what operatives have been arrested -- hezbollah operatives have been arrested in the united states. why, again, why would iran and hezbollah want a presence in the western hemisphere? why would they want intercontinental ballistic missile? because they mean us great harm at the end of the day. and if they yet the means to do it, they'll use it. look, it doesn't have to be conventional firing off a missile, intercontinental. it doesn't have to be that way. there's many ways iran can strike the united states and hezbollah, its proxy, can strike the united states. we have the possibility of an electromagnetic pulse an emp attack which iran has studied and tested. many possibilities. non

he was wary of even challenging the mullahs rhetorically in that instance. that the president had some harsh words but not nearly as tough as gordon brown the perform former prime minister of britain and nicolas sarkozy former prime minister of france. all throughout his administration he sought to look at iran in the most positive light. he has as the end goal warmer relations between the united states and iran. martha: fascinating. steve, thank you very much. >> you bet. >> see on the side of your screen, now on your whole screen. this is the person who is introducing benjamin netanyahu. we're waiting for the speech. just moments away. we'll take you there live. bill: that is bob cohen. we could dip in a moment. he does the intro obviously for benjamin netanyahu. he said on the tarmac before he left tel aviv yesterday he comes to america what he believes is something that is paramount to the israeli people and he speaks on behalf of all the jewish people when he comes here. the big event tomorrow, bipartisan meeting in house of representatives. today, this

about themselves because iraq iraq, iran would come to iraq in the first monday will look for is the mullahbecause they have 100 soldiers under them with the head on the right the body on the left no question they will walk out. that's it. in "the wall street journal" spinner it really a? >> you can never get enough fears. -- prayers'. >>. >> what is your take on secretary of state? >> john kerry? [laughter] i am just kidding. it is that same sort of world you he will go to the middle east to negotiate israel to accommodate our enemies and the goal is to get through some kinda deal just to say they have bid deal but if you listen because they live in that part of the world it contradicts policies and how they approach. kerry, i know they keep canadians anything in a think he is strong enough for the administration is serious enough to allow him to be strong. to prevent iran from getting a bomb. i am just looking forward to do 2016. [laughter] [applause] >> banks for being here. i am curious there has been a number of books out with the american's sabre and it seems cecile community comes ou

. >> hard to get inside the heads of the mullahs. i'm not sure i would if i could.y very well see their best option as pushing the united states as far as they can, get what the united states is willing to agree to out in the open and then not have an agreement and go on their merry way inch essence pocketing the public disclosure of the concessions, and then wait for things to develop. >> real quick, your take, all this comes at a time we have alien yeted if not as extra sized and punished, israel. we have taken iran, hezbollah off a global terror watch list. couldn't be more blatant. >> that's correct. the wrong-headedness of this is just impossible to overstate and every time you try to describe it, the administration one ups you. >> but deal or don't deal, a dangerous die has been cast here. >> for sure, and it's going to be a long year and a half two years, before the ship gets righted. >> michael, thank you very much. when we come back what drove this pie thereto drive the plane into the ground. what investigators are dying to -- doing to try to find out. and

in other words, mullahs have calculated, correctly in my view, the benefits of breakout are not worth the cost. the key to any agreement with iran is keep the cost of breakout high and the benefits low. this is the most realistic path to keep iran from becoming a nuclear weapons state. not party pan dreams. for more go to cnn.com/fareed and read my "washington post" column this week. let's get started. for more on iran's nuclear ambitions and prime minister's netanyahu's speech to congress and much more i have a terrific panel joining me today. anne-marie slaughter, policy planning state department in president obama's first term. she's now president and ceo of the think tank new america. joseph nye, former assistant secretary of defense, former dean of the kennedy school of government former professor of mine and long time professor at harvard university. he's the author of the new book "is the american century over?" brett stephens is a pulitzer prize winning columnist for the "wall street journal," and and peter beinart is a political commentator. imagine that bibi gets his wish th

the mullah is in detention and confessed that he cheated and told lies. some foolish people ordered that she be beaten saying she is not muslim. >> nine men have been arrested. no evidence has been found supporting the accusation against the victim. >> join us for our regular segment the week ahead. for more on the way forward in u.s.-afghan relations, coming up here on al jazeera america. . >> the president of tunisia says his forces are on the hunt for a man that attacked a museum. a third escaped. security camera footage shows suspects before the footage interacting with another man carrying a backpack. the government killed 21 people in tunis on wednesday. >> the u.s. government reopened the embassy in saudi arabia. officials closed three offices citing security concerns. they received threats of kidnapping and assault, and warned they were high targets for terrorist attacks. >> the first lady left cambodia after two days of promoting girls education. she met with n.g.o.s and others part of a peace core initiative called let girls learn, promoting gen

. >> all >> all reports are that this deal that negotiations are going on now, the mullahs of iran willn fact be allowed to enrich uranium. they have they have the delivery system. as president what would you say to any deal that was struck before you took office as it relates to a -- >> i hope that congress acts on this and requires that this deal go back for approval in the united states congress. i think that is the first step because it will be done by executive order the next president is forced to undo back by executive order as well. that would be the best thing to do. there should be no light between us and israel and we need to be clear that other discussions as it relates to iran needs to include their strategy of using surrogates to destabilize the region. focusing on whether iran has a weapon and now we're going to regulate it is bad policy. >> what is your response to a president who cannot -- >> this is all about economic uncertainty if they could just get job. >> a jobs program for jihadis. >> the jihadi from london was wealthy. this misunderstanding is very dangerous bec

i have to agree it's a little bit childish to be sending it to the mullahs.hink president certainly needs a refresher course on constitutional law, and i don't think he should be circumventing congress on very, very important issue like. they're both ignoring each other. >> how is this different from 1997? how is this different when 95 senator, by the way, not just any senator, john kerry, the current secretary of state, the former defense secretary, hand selected by president obama, chuck hagel, boxer. feinstein did not choose to vote on that. number of democrats overwhelmingly 95-0, snubbed bill clinton top, doing exact same thing when he was negotiating kyoto? it is exact same thing. this faux outrage by the white house nobody should be buying it. they have every right to do what they did. they're strengthening president's hand. should send them edible arrangement. >> you heard call them the enemy. trotting out cruise missiles and everything else while the deal is talked about leading up to the deadline later this month. we'll cover news on this. >>> new s

. >> translator: unfortunately, we've seen that we cannot trust the americans, this young mullah saysave shown that the nuclear issue is an excuse. they want to take everything away from us. our religion our dignity. and this one says, the americans want too much. that's why we're not optimistic. and there's many times when the u.s. has not been honest. for now, iran's highest thortd says he supports negotiations. but he also says he wants a good deal for iran. i will agree to a deal that's practical, he said. of course not with a bad deal. the americans repeatedly state they believe no deal is better than a bad deal. we are of this opinion, as well. and many attending friday prayers say additional sanctions and even military confrontation don't scare them. >> the reason we are progressing is because of the sanctions. not despite of the sanctions. you see? we are a great nation. everybody you see here they're ready to go to war. we're not afraid. >> reporter: many iranians do want sanction relief as fast as possible. but strong hardliners say they would rather continue under sanctions

. >> how he's been giving everyone away so it's time to spin some mullah and make some moves.ddress the cornerback position and seattle's cornerback byron maxwell has been rumored as a target. immediate upgrade to the position. today he told philly magazine he made a great pit for the eagles defense and he'd listen to chip if chip gave him a call. chip, the fans are waiting for you to make some moves. fans will be happy finally this off seas season. >> that will do it for us us at 10:00. >> they removed the children from me because i allowed aaron to beat me for a year. >> announcer: a mother breaks a brutal cycle. >> judge judy: where is he now? >> he's in jail. >> judge judy: for what? >> for domestic violence and injury to a child. >> judge judy: who did he injure? >> my youngest son. >> announcer: but did she wait too long? >> judge judy: so, what'd you stay for? >> i don't know. >> judge judy: she should never have custody of her children again. >> announcer: "judge judy." you are about to enter the courtroom of judge judith sheindlin. the people are real. the cases are r

the local mullah accused her of burning a koran, but the government says it has found no proof that itd. the mob beat her, burned her on fire and threw her in the river. 26 people have been arrested. >>> meantime jerusalem mourns seven brothers and sisters killed in a house fire in new york. they ranged in age from 5 all the way to 16. new york's fire commissioner says a hot plate meant to keep food warm over the sabbath sparked the blaze on saturday. >> the victims' mother and sister survived by jumping from a second-story window. the mother is in critical condition. the children's father was not at home when the fire broke out. >>> the united states and south korea are in the midst of their annual joint military exercises. every year their war games draw the anger of north korea. pyongyang claims they're a rehearsal for an invasion. our paula hancocks is live there in seoul. these training exercises happen every year and every year we hear pyongyang's rhetoric. given how routine the threats have become does seoul take them seriously anymore? how seriously do they take them? >> report

. >> how he's been giving everyone away so it's time to spin some mullah and make some moves.he cornerback position and seattle's cornerback byron maxwell has been rumored as a target. immediate upgrade to the position. today he told philly magazine he made a great pit for the eagles defense and he'd listen to chip if chip gave him a call. chip, the fans are waiting for you to make some moves. fans will be happy finally this off seas season. >> that will do it for us us at 10:00 welcome to our sales event. [crowd] thanks jan. you're the best jan. oh! nice. 0% apr financing on select models... hey, on top. you're welcome. and that's my typical day. [kids cheering] you're up. you wanna... nope. at our 1 for everyone sales event, get 0% apr financing for 60 months on a 2015 prius. offer ends march 31st. for great deals on other toyotas, visit toyota.com. this is out of this world. you bet your asteroid. toyota. let's go places. >> today on tmz -- >> okay. so we broke this harrison ford story. we got all sorts of video of the takeoff, the crash landing. >> oh, no! >> dude, come on

weekend our secretary of state said we're close to a deal at the very same moment with the top iranian mullahhanting death to america. is that somebody we even should be sitting down at the table with? >> every year in iran they celebrate what's called death to america day. it's the anniversary of iran taking americans hostages in the 1970s. if history teaches one thing, it is that if somebody tells you they want to kill you. >> believe them. >> believe them. >> what do you think about the president and his treatment of prime minister netanyahu and israel? >> it is shameful, it is disgraceful. this administration has been the most antagonistic administration to israel in the history of this country. >> last question. so you mentioned number three is putin. we talked about terrorism, we talked about iran. how do you deal with his territorial ambitions? how do you stop putin? the price of oil has crippled his economy a little bit, but -- >> yes. putin is fundamentally a kgb thug. he's not a complicated man. he's been very candid. he says he considers the greatest geopolitical disaster of modern

the mullahs are bad people. they're human rights violators. they support terrorism.they're bad people but for the sake of global peace, if the deal on paper looks solid and you can inspect, you got to make it. >> they don't even, they want it on a post-in note or -- >> an understanding until in june. >> this is what they're supposed to do. sign the agreement by tuesday. quantify number of uranium enrichment centrifuges that keep spinning and design the reactor to limit plutonium production that willdmake a bomb. this is like a woman going to the altar, saying, honey i will love you forever, i will sign the marriage license. i will give you my life. he says, okay i will go to the altar with you. i'm not signing the agreement. hey, by the way i've been cheating on you for years, you're not supposed to trust me because of my past history but i will marry you anyway. would you do that? both sides have to agree on a deal. >> you would be allowed to have inspector follow him around. that is the difference. >> god that sounds like a fun marriage. inspector what happened las

forward and accomplished the agreements that they had pledged to do about nuclear weapons, did the mullahegime tell us about the existence of this new tell us about the existence of this new nuclear facility that our friends in the mek who we're permitted to sit out in the middle of the desert did we know about that nuclear facility? >> what you're saying it's a nuclear facility. that is yet to be determined, but we know about the facility, yes. >> so had they disclosed that facility to us? >> it has not been revealed yet as a nuclear facility. it is a facility that we are aware of, which is on a list of facilities we have. i'm not going to go into greater detail, but these things are going to have to be resolved as we go forward. >> let me note that most of us who have been somewhat upset because, again, the administration seems unable to prioritize the helping of our major friends. to me, a major friend is who is the greatest enemy of our enemy who can help bring down our enemy the most. for example, we have left, and again this leads to a question, we have left the most heroic person i

. >> republicans declare war on peace talks writing an open letter to the mullahs in iran to try to sink a nuclear deal. tonight the president is responding? >> it's somewhat ironic to see some members of congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in iraq. >> meanwhile, in hillary land -- >> all of this is just the same cook nammy stuff. >> plus, a true crime bombshell from hbo. >> this was found inside this. >> charlie baggily of "the new york times" on re-opening the case against robert durst and why a hip-hop musical about america's first treasury secretary has everyone from paul mccartney to rupert murdoch raving. >> bullets in your gun when we rule as one ♪ >> my interview with the genius behind "hamilton," lin-manuel miranda. >> the fight between hamilton and jefferson are the fights you're still having on your network. >> "all in" starts right now. good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. a stunning escalation in republicans' attempts to sabotage nuclear diplomacy with iran was on display today. the latest move an extreme lie unusual open letter signed by 47 re

terror raging almost out of control in the middle east the president obama doesn't get a deal with the mullahs will look like a total failure. to be fair the president inherited a very messy situation from president bush. but there is no question. mr. obama made the situation worse. by a series of tactical blunders including moving all u.s. troops from iraq. how on earth isis could gain incredible power without president obama doing anything about it at all is almost impossible to believe. the jay vee comment will haunt the president forever. so now it's time for the obama administration to admit what's happening. and to finally get a strategy to defeat the jihadists. and that's the memo. now for the top story tonight, reaction. joining us from washington charles krauthammer. so where am i going wrong here, charles? >> in the main you got it right but i will correct you on a few details. the first about iraq situation, the mess that was supposedly left by the bush administration well, david petraeus said in an interview friday in the "the washington post," a very important interview incidental

do you really trust the mullahs in iran with their radical islamic views? >> no i don't. >> they shouldn't have a nuclear weapon weapon. >> they shouldn't. and they will never have a nuclear weapon. what we're trying to do is avoid having a military solution to achieve that goal. no one's taken the military off the table. what the rational voices in this conversation are trying to do is negotiate no nuclear weapon as opposed to having to bomb no nuclear weapon. >> tony tata general? >> i'm not sure what world you're living in. the military solution is happening now. iran is in iraq. they are fighting not as an ally to us. they are fighting to push the arabs away from the persian border as they've done for thousands of years. they're fighting in syria. they're fighting all across -- against u.s. interests. they want to destroy israel. the military solution is on the table now. it's on the battlefield. and they're practicing destroying our aircraft carriers -- >> you're arguing we should be at war with iran right now? >> no. all i'm saying is that they are al

amanpour was raised in iran until age 11 and apparently does not believe the mullahs would act unilaterallynuke. she does, however, use the phrase deep lack of trust. and that is the crux of the matter. many americans and israelis will oppose any deal the president makes with iran because they don't trust him. and, of course they don't trust the mull also a. the only thing mr. obama could do is lay the terms out so everybody could see them. but some in his party oppose that. >> we don't know what is being developed in that agreement. that's one thing we don't know for sure. >> that's true. and so we are having a lot of discussion about something that we don't know anything about. and the parts that may be most difficult i don't think we should know about right now. >> so let me get this straight congressman. we, the people, should not know what america is proposing to prevent iran from developing a nuclear weapon? is that what you're saying? good grief. this isn't some economic treaty. it's a matter of mass destruction in the hands of crazy zealots. time for clarity, mr. president. time for

the mullahs in iran are the weasel. mean isis -- there are a whole slew of weasels out there. >> exactly. >> and the thing about the woodpecker is you can't see who's on your back. >> exactly. >> for all he knows, it could be another woodpecker. >> it could be. >> they think that the weasel needs a job. that's the problem. they're carrying him to the employment office. they're going to give him some options. they've got a little resume folded up in the pocket. >> yeah. >> i want to know what your problem with cat stevens is. i draw the line with cat stevens. >> because he was okay with the killing of what's his face? sal salman rushdie. he was okay with that. >> that was like, 30 years ago. come on. that was, like, ancient history. there's new ones. >> by the way, this picture created quite a stir. and some memes. my favorite picture came up. this is delightful. >> so many of those. >> i know. i like that one. >> is that a little putin? >> yes, a little putin. by the way, that's actual size. >> did you photoshop that yo