mullan >> dennis michael mulligan >> peter james mulligan >> michael joseph mullin >> james donald munhall >> nancy muniz >> carlos munoz >> brian joseph murphy >> charles anthony murphy >> christopher w. murphy >> edward charles murphy >> james f. murphy iv >> james thomas murphy >> kevin james murphy >> patrick sean murphy >> raymond e. murphy >> robert eddie murphy, jr. >> john joseph murray >> john joseph murray, jr. >> susan d. murray >> valerie victoria murray >> richard todd myhre >> and my uncle, we love and miss you every day. >> and my husband, peter mulligan. the memory of our time together will forever be into my heart and soul. i will miss you and love you forever. >> robert b. nagel >> takuya nakamura >> alexander napier >> frank joseph naples iii >> john napolitano >> catherine ann nardella >> mario nardone, jr. >> manika k. narula >> mehmood naseem >> narender nath >> karen susan navarro >> joseph micheal navas >> francis joseph nazario >> glenroy i. neblett >> rayman marcus neblett >> jerome o. nedd >> laurence nedell >> luke g. nee >> and my brother, we love you and miss

>> the mulligan letters were the accusation as opposed to being his defense and he tried very hard tothem seem as though they had no value. i read something about him slamming them down on the desk and daring people to read them. then he stole them from whoever had them. he went to the hotel and then he disappeared with them and he never returned them. he tried to use them as a way to protect himself. i don't think that there's any clarity that he was not guilty. some called him jay gould's handyman or busboys are something to that effect. >> they continue to dog him. in the eighth 84 campaign, someone publish what was believed to be a version of the mulliken letters and a pamphlet. -- mulligan letters and a pamphlet. >> we will involve some of our viewers in the discussion. our first caller is from atlanta. caller: hello, how are you tonight? >> great, thank you. caller: i just finished reading the biography of speaker read. they seem in the same place. is that true? is that just a feature of the biography? >> no, i think you are correct. your mentioning thomas reed who was born in p

there is a really sizzling hot love story between he and carey mulligan and action and car driving.loved it. you know what? albert brooks plays a bad guy in this movie. really away from character. this guy will kill you fast. he's insane and bad. this movie is fantastic. >> what's your grade? >> loved it. a, a, a. >> oh, my gosh. putting the pedal to the metal with a really high score. a on "drive." let's go to "i don't know how she does it." sarah jessica parker. life imitating art, art imitating life in her case. let's take a look at how the movie unfolds. >> sorry. i'm going to silence this thing. >> everything okay? >> yep! i think you will see that i targeted a few industries where i see the dividends multiplying. >> yeah. >> okay. so it looks like there are supposed to be funny moments. did it tickle you? >> yes. it did. you know, i don't know how he she does it. she doesn't know how she does it. i don't think she'll ever do it but it was fun to watch. >> it's good. some of her movies that she's starred in haven't done super great lately. might this be the one to put her on to

. >> little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. they don't get a do-over. >> reporter: in fact, bachmann's downfall, according to some party faithful, may have come the day rick perry entered the race. >> my check bachmann did very well obviously in the iowa straw poll, but the entrance of rick perry has changed the race around and it remains to be seen whether rick perry can keep that star power he's had and how that affects michele bachmann and her getting her legs and traction back in the race. >> reporter: they will be listening intently tonight to see what michele bachmann has to say, but i have to say the feeling here is the bloom is off the rose when it comes to the bachmann campaign. dave brian, cbs 5 from l.a. allen, back to you. >> thanks, dave. >>> and we'll be right back. ,,,,,,,, when your eyes are smiling... ,,,,,,,, you're smiling. and when they're laughing... you're laughing. be kind to your eyes... with transitions lenses. transitions adapt to changing light so you see your whole day comfortably... and convenientl

little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. >> do you feel he placed the health and safety of young girls in the state of texas behind or below the need for campaign funds? >> well, i will tell you that i had a mother last night come up to me here in tampa, florida, after the debate. she told me her little daughter took that vaccine, that injection and she suffered from mental retardation thereafter. >> the problem with that answer is that there is no scientific evidence that these injections are dangerous, as she said in the debate or cause mental retardation yet matt lauer didn't follow up. took 24 hours for media to bring the facts to people. shouldn't we move more quickly with that kind of inflammatory charge? >> as soon as that was online people started asking questions. i know a guy from an autism group sent me an e-mail later that day saying, this is outrageous and dangerous because it's playing to the vaccine fear that a lot of researchers believe getting kids actually killed. >> your newspaper in the new york times had a

it is not good enough to take a mulligan when you want a do over, when you have little children's livesreta: a big difference whether you do it because you really believe it is right and you are flat out wrong or shouldn't have done it or whatever. the other difference is whether you did it because you wanted a campaign contribution. i'm curious which you think was the one here with the governor? >> well, of course i don't know the thoughts and the intents of the governor's heart. i have no idea what they are nor would i speculate. i think it is important to írhis donor, like so many other of the governor's donors received appointments, political favors. i think we are going to hear more about that in the course of the campaign this is what the american people don't want. they don't want crony capitalism. it infuriates them. we saw that with president obama when we saw over 500 million dollars go to solyndra political donor of president obama. it is no better when republicans engage in that as well. people don't want crony capitalism. >> greta: congresswoman, thank you. >> thanks greta.

little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. they don't get a do-over. the parents don't get a do-over. >> and at the end of the day, this was about trying to stop a cancer and giving the parental option to opt out of that. and at the end of the day, you may criticize me about the way that i went about it, but at the end of the day, i am always going to err on the side of life. and that's what this was really all about for me. >> i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order, there was a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can't deny that. what i'm saying is that it's wrong for a drug company because the governor's former chief of staff was the chief lobbyist for this drug company. the drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donations to the governor. this is just flat-out wrong. the question is is it about life or was it about millions of dollars and potentially billions for a drug company? >> the company was merck, and it was a $5,000 con

little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. they don't get a do-over. the parents don't get a do-over. >> and at the end of the day, this was about trying to stop a cancer and giving the parental option to opt out of that. and at the end of the day, you may criticize me about the way that i went about it, but at the end of the day, i am always going to err on the side of life. and that's what this was really all about for me. >> i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order, there was a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can't deny that. what i'm saying is that it's wrong for a drug company because the governor's former chief of staff was the chief lobbyist for this drug company. the drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donations to the governor. this is just flat-out wrong. the question is is it about life or was it about millions of dollars and potentially billions for a drug company? >> the company was merck, and it was a $5,000 con

that's -- little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligano-over. >> medical experts quickly took issue with the potentially dangerous assertion. and then congresswoman bachmann dug the hole deeper the next morning. >> well, i will tell you that i had a mother last night come up to me here in tampa, florida, after the debate. she told me her little daughter took that vaccine, that injection, and she suffered from mental retardation thereafter. it can have very dangerous side effects. >> there is no evidence, zero, that hpv vaccine can cause mental retardation. tonight the congresswoman is backtracking. >> during the debate i didn't make any statements that would indicate that i'm a doctor, i'm a scientist or i'm making any conclusions about the drug one way or another. i didn't make any statements about that. at the conclusion of the debate a woman came up to me who was very distraught. she was crying and she thanked me for my remarks and said her daughter had had a negative reaction and that's all i related. >> one more question. >> did you

little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. they don't get a do over. the parents don't get a do over. that's why i fought so hard in washington, d.c., against president obama and obama care. i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order there is a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can't deny that. >> what you are suggesting? >> what i'm saying is that it's wrong for a drug company because the governor's former chief of staff is the chief lobbyist for this drug company. the drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donation tosz the governor. and this is just flat out wrong. the question is, is it about life or was it about millions of dollars and potentially billions for a drug company? >> let the senator hold off for a second. you have to respond to that. >> yes, sir, the company was merck. and it was a $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raise about $30 million. if you're saying that i can be bought for $5,000, i'm offe

of held back and said, listen, he did what he thought was right then and we can all sort of use a mulligan. so i thought that was a real statesman like mome for him. i think challenge for perry is going to be picking which fights he wants to pick and mak he's obviously going to be the fighter here. he's a bruiser when it comes to this. you saw him picking fights with paul but i think he will have to decide how many fights he'll pick because at some point risks coming off as petty if he's picking so many fights with karl rove to social security and ron paul. i think south is going to be really important here. we don't know what the calendar is going to look like in terms of those primary because lot of southern states are going to be going early on supertuesday. i think romney, his team strategy, a, they think this will make... it will make it a mination worth having. perry would be obviously a very formidable opponent for him. it would make him that much stronger in the general and i think one of the things they'll try do is make him a regional candidate. >> i'll tell you something else yo

. >> little girls who have a n negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan. they don't get a do-over. >> reporter: then suggested perry was interested in doing more than saving lives. >> i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order there was a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can't deny that. >> you've got to respond to that. >> yes, sir. the company was merck, and it was a $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raise about $30 million. and if you're saying that i can be bought for $5,000, i'm offended. >> reporter: and perry found himself on the wrong side of the tea party when he defended support for in-state tuition for the children of illegal immigrants. >> a policy that got boos from the crowd. >> that is not the american way. >> reporter: well, in the end, perry was hit hard but stayed on his feet, which is why he will continue on. as the front-runner in the race, tomorrow he heads to virginia, not a very important state to republican primary voters, but the

>> the mulligan letters were the accusation as opposed to being his defense and he tried very hard to make them seem as though they had no value. i read something about him slamming them down on the desk and daring people to read them -- once he had stolen them from whoever had them. he went to the hotel and then he disappeared with them and he never returned them. he tried to use them as a way to protect himself. i don't think that there's any clarity that he was not guilty. i think it is pretty clear that he was. some called him jay gould's handyman or busboy or something to that effect, that he was so tight with the railroad industry. it was unlikely that he was innocent. >> they continue to dog him. in the 1884 campaign, someone published what was believed to be a version of the mulligan letters in a pamphlet. he never quite resolved that. >> we will involve some of our viewers in the discussion. our first caller is from atlanta. roger, you are on the air. caller: hello, how are you tonight? >> great, thank you. caller: i just finished reading the biography of speaker reed. for tw

>> shortly before, some letters -- the mulligan letters or a field which traded a big scandal for himnvolve some very questionable stock deals involving the railroads. -- some letters were revealed which created a big scandal for him. that clouded the picture for him in 1876. blaine recognized this was happening at the convention. he actually was -- i am sorry. in '76, it went to hayes. night -- 1880 was garfield. >> he ran again in 1880. where the half breeds and the stalwarts active in the party by then? >> i am not sure that they had those terms anymore. there was still divisions within the party. that year, james garfield did get the nomination thanks to blaine in many ways. >> blaine wanted that nomination himself that it came after many many balance. -- ballots. andrea understood that was not going to happen. he threw his votes to garfield. >> what happened to him after that? >> he became secretary of state. >> garfield was struck by an assassin's bullet. blaine was actually with him in the train station. >> yes, he was. >> do you know the story? >> they were walking arm in arm

mulligan. memories of our time together will forever be seared into my heart and soul. you and love you forever. [names being read] [names being read] [names being read] >> and my brother, mauricio golzalez. we love you and miss you refry day, and we hope to one day be able to unit with you again. >> and my father, patrick shaun much. i know every time i am in the woods or i catch a big fish, i know you're up there smiling at me. we all love and miss you, dad. [names being read] [names being read] name >> and my husband, steven george adams, a gentleman, a friend to so many, a philosopher and a believer in peace and justice in this world. >> and my loving guardian. may you rest in peace. [names being read] [names being read] >> and my beautiful mother, who enriched the lives of countless people with her spirit, genresity and devotion. >> and my nephew, who taught me about the greatness of america. we miss you, your mom, your sons, your wife, procedures and sisters. we all miss you. [names being read] [names being read] >> and my father, james nelson. mom, kalin and i mi

. >> little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don't get a mulligan, they don't get a do-over. >> reporter: then she suggested that perry was doing more than interested in saving lives. >> i just wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order there is a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can't, we can't deny that. >> you got to respond to that. >> yes, sir. >> the company was merck and it was a $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raise about $30 million and if you're saying that i could be bought for $5,000, i'm offended. >> reporter: and perry found himself on the wrong side of the tea party when he defended his support for in-state college tuition for the children of illegal immigrants, a policy that got booze frs from the cro. >> that is not the american way. >> reporter: perry took his hits, but he walked out of the cnn tea party debate with front-runner status in tact. he goes on to take his campaign to vavirginia. it is a crucial battleground in the upcoming

. >> little dpurls who ha-- littls who have a dangerous reaction to this drug don't get a mulligan, theyuggested perry was interesting in more than saving lives. >> i wanted to add that we cannot forget that in the midst of this executive order there is a big drug company that made millions of dollars because of this mandate. we can't -- we can't deny that. >> you got to respond to that. >> yes, sir. the company was merck, and it was a $,000 contribution that i -- $5,000 contribution that i had received from them. i raised about $30 million. if you're saying that i can bepube bought for $5,000, i'm offended. >> reporter: perry found himself on the wrong side of the tea party when he defended in-state tuition for children of illegal immigrant. a policy that got boos from the crowd. [ booing ] >> that is not the american way. [ applause ] >> that was jim on, coacosta. is this a two-person race? joining us to talk about the candidates and how they score sudden cnn contributor john avalon, reporter for "the daily beast." rather than pick a winner, what was your observation as far as who impr

that's -- little girls who have a negative reaction to this potential dangerous drug don't get a mulligan parents don't get a do over. i'm offended for all the little girls and parents who didn't have a choice. >> that response got a huge applause, but is she right? >> well, i'm not sure she's got her facts right here. he did not force girls in texas to get hpv. it was an executive mandate, and you could opt out. parents could say, no, i don't want to vaccinate by sixth grader. the whole thing never took effect because it ended up being reversed by the legislation. he was going to force anybody to do it. >> thank you very much. >>> next, barbara starr at the pentagon. we heard from the country's top two intelligence officials today. the take away al-qaeda is weaker, but still a threat. >> oh, absolutely. you know, it's interesting. this was the first appearance before congress by david petraeus. now cia director petraeus, along with jim clapper, the head of the u.s. intelligence community. petraeus probably got most of the attention talking about al-qaeda. threatened diminished by the kil

. >> along those lines if we were going to give the president a mulligan and rewind the clock and ifit a stra tege tegic blunder to put the first 18 months on health care. we need reform in this country. it's hard to look back and say if we had a do-over maybe we would have started with jobs? >> let me say two things about that. one is, the people who are most interested in his doing health care within the white house were the budget people because the cost of health care was growing at such an expo nen shall rate if we didn't reform the health care system and get that under control we couldn't get our budget under control in the long term. the second thing i have a child with a chronic illness, a preexisting condition, we almost went bankrupt when i was a young reporter and we were dealing with her medical care. there are millions of people across this country who have gone through that or are going through that now. i don't think they could wait a generation for us to deal with this issue. so i think the president did the right thing. both in terms of the economy and in terms of th

you get a mulligan? >> gretchen, you are street smart. you are so street smart. that's exactly it. very little footage of me. >> all right. so we've got a busy three hours live from new york and dallas as well. all right, brian, stand by. in the meantime, we'll talk about what's going on politically. we've heard the president wants to give a big jobs speech after his vacation in martha's vineyard. well, yesterday, it was revealed that apparently, the white house sent out a note that they wanted a joint session of congress. this without actually asking the house of representatives whether or not it was ok. they said no. we'll tell you why in a moment but first of all, ann coulter last night said a joint session? that's kooky. >> the idea that he's calling a joint session of congress for this. i mean, that is for state of the union addresses, for an announcement of war, after an attack on the nation. joint session of congress, just to hear the same old nonsense from this guy? >> so that's ann coulter's point of view. herman cain running for president on the republican side of things