of active dessingination jz intend to bring before congration eman well [inaudible] in the coming mupths. staff also continues to work with the historic preservation fund committee on a number of contact statements and surveys including the african american historic context statement. we have new outletreach strategy we deviceed and plan to start that in the next few months. also, the [inaudible] historic context statements and then we also have a resident park context statement that will probably come before you for adoption in the coming months as well. and then lastly, to better track the status of article 10 and 11 designation we established the following performance measures. one is to prepare the designation report within 150 hours. for ingleside staff present 105 hours on that report and i do want to point out we added one more tracking measure to your report this quarter that was for the admin time we dedicate to the program. during the past quarter we spent 140 hours of staff time on administrative tasks, phone calls, mailings not directly related to a designation. we typically

is community consensus on the scheme for the playground and i expect that sometime in the next 6 mupths there will be a concept plan for your review and approval. and then there are preliminary studies in process before the participatory design begins for the second 3 of the first 6 tier one playground. that is [inaudible] panhandle play grown and john mclaren at the picnic areament that brings us to today which is next step formalizing a partnership. we ask to approve the grant agreement to recommend the boardf supervisors accept the grant and approve the mou between the department and parks alliance on how we'll partner on this project. so, to start with the grant agreement, here is highlights. the term of the agreement is 8 years and then the grant agreement defines a general use of funds for the initiative and playground budgets will be developed on a project by project basis. only private funds will be used for campaign expenses including park alliance staff and playground related special events qu the goal is $10.75 million but we seek approval to accept up to $15 million in case

of active dessingination jz intend to bring before congration eman well [inaudible] in the coming mupths. staff also continues to work with the historic preservation fund committee on a number of contact statements and surveys including the african american historic context statement. we have new outletreach strategy we deviceed and plan to start that in the next few months. also, the [inaudible] historic context statements and then we also have a resident park context statement that will probably come before you for adoption in the coming months as well. and then lastly, to better track the status of article 10 and 11 designation we established the following performance measures. one is to prepare the designation report within 150 hours. for ingleside staff present 105 hours on that report and i do want to point out we added one more tracking measure to your report this quarter that was for the admin time we dedicate to the program. during the past quarter we spent 140 hours of staff time on administrative tasks, phone calls, mailings not directly related to a designation. we typically

is community consensus on the scheme for the playground and i expect that sometime in the next 6 mupths there will be a concept plan for your review and approval. and then there are preliminary studies in process before the participatory design begins for the second 3 of the first 6 tier one playground. that is [inaudible] panhandle play grown and john mclaren at the picnic areament that brings us to today which is next step formalizing a partnership. we ask to approve the grant agreement to recommend the boardf supervisors accept the grant and approve the mou between the department and parks alliance on how we'll partner on this project. so, to start with the grant agreement, here is highlights. the term of the agreement is 8 years and then the grant agreement defines a general use of funds for the initiative and playground budgets will be developed on a project by project basis. only private funds will be used for campaign expenses including park alliance staff and playground related special events qu the goal is $10.75 million but we seek approval to accept up to $15 million in case

of active dessingination jz intend to bring before congration eman well [inaudible] in the coming mupths. staff also continues to work with the historic preservation fund committee on a number of contact statements and surveys including the african american historic context statement. we have new outletreach strategy we deviceed and plan to start that in the next few months. also, the [inaudible] historic context statements and then we also have a resident park context statement that will probably come before you for adoption in the coming months as well. and then lastly, to better track the status of article 10 and 11 designation we established the following performance measures. one is to prepare the designation report within 150 hours. for ingleside staff present 105 hours on that report and i do want to point out we added one more tracking measure to your report this quarter that was for the admin time we dedicate to the program. during the past quarter we spent 140 hours of staff time on administrative tasks, phone calls, mailings not directly related to a designation. we typically

for december and come back at the end of january for the regular session on the last weekend of the mupth. we did see pretty good crowds for the new years eve fireworks show despite the fact the majority the great lawn is fenced for demolition but there were no unusual traffic problems or incident to report as a result. we did have a meeting with bcdc staff and representatives from treasure island enterprises and treasure island sailing center to discuss the compromise plan for clipper cove and initiate the discussion of bc applications for both tie and tisc as separate projects going forward. we look forward working with bcdc staff to evaluate the conformance of the proposed plan with bcdc objectives during the application processment we also working on long term leases with both tie and tisc. next week our-two weeks from yesterday the resolution of initants to form the ifd and cfd will be back before the board of supervisors. the resolutions were adauptded in december and on the 24th will hold the public hearings on the formation. the special election by property owners and the board wi

this gives a ovview of the number of referrals we receive each mupth. the first month of impmentation we had 30 referrals which is not surprising. most were from family members and family members are a long proponent adopting aot in san francisco. since that time it leveled off and on achberage we have 9 referrals a month. looking at the number of court orders in total in the first year of implementation we filed 7 core petitions. two of which were extensions of existing core putensions so only 5 individuals that we putensioned the court to order into treatment. the result of those are three resulted in a settlement akbrument where the individual agrud to work with us, three court ordered to participate in outpatient service and one withdrawn because we were unable to contact the individual. in total 60 percent of the individuals we had contact with accepted voluntary sunchss. the number of core petitions filed is lower than in other counties and speak tooz the uniqueness of our program and care team outreaching kwl engage individuals in voluntary servi

for december and come back at the end of january for the regular session on the last weekend of the mupth. we did see pretty good crowds for the new years eve fireworks show despite the fact the majority the great lawn is fenced for demolition but there were no unusual traffic problems or incident to report as a result. we did have a meeting with bcdc staff and representatives from treasure island enterprises and treasure island sailing center to discuss the compromise plan for clipper cove and initiate the discussion of bc applications for both tie and tisc as separate projects going forward. we look forward working with bcdc staff to evaluate the conformance of the proposed plan with bcdc objectives during the application processment we also working on long term leases with both tie and tisc. next week our-two weeks from yesterday the resolution of initants to form the ifd and cfd will be back before the board of supervisors. the resolutions were adauptded in december and on the 24th will hold the public hearings on the formation. the special election by property owners and the board wi

is community consensus on the scheme for the playground and i expect that sometime in the next 6 mupths there will be a concept plan for your review and approval. and then there are preliminary studies in process before the participatory design begins for the second 3 of the first 6 tier one playground. that is [inaudible] panhandle play grown and john mclaren at the picnic areament that brings us to today which is next step formalizing a partnership. we ask to approve the grant agreement to recommend the boardf supervisors accept the grant and approve the mou between the department and parks alliance on how we'll partner on this project. so, to start with the grant agreement, here is highlights. the term of the agreement is 8 years and then the grant agreement defines a general use of funds for the initiative and playground budgets will be developed on a project by project basis. only private funds will be used for campaign expenses including park alliance staff and playground related special events qu the goal is $10.75 million but we seek approval to accept up to $15 million in case

happy to say that at this point 6 mupths in we completed close to a third of the projects and about half are on or ahead of strej. some of schedule will be done in the next couple weeks, so more than sthree quarters of the projicts we are well on the path to deliver. there are few delays and i'll talk in more detail in those in the next few slides. the reason for the delays illustrate why it is so challenging to execute these complicated and transformative projects in san francisco. i'll start with good news and that is what we have got done in fall 2016. if you have been oneter side the building we have begun projects on polk street which bring a raised cycle track, 11 corner bulbout squz new traffic signals between puck between here and pine. also on construction in van fless with chwill bring lots of pedestrian safety features including left turn prohibitions, medium referages, traffic signals, and curb extensions and make van ness a safer place to walk and drive. we have begun to motorcycle campaign. motorcycles are far disproportionately representered in the driver fatallies even th

happy to say that at this point 6 mupths in we completed close to a third of the projects and about half are on or ahead of strej. some of schedule will be done in the next couple weeks, so more than sthree quarters of the projicts we are well on the path to deliver. there are few delays and i'll talk in more detail in those in the next few slides. the reason for the delays illustrate why it is so challenging to execute these complicated and transformative projects in san francisco. i'll start with good news and that is what we have got done in fall 2016. if you have been oneter side the building we have begun projects on polk street which bring a raised cycle track, 11 corner bulbout squz new traffic signals between puck between here and pine. also on construction in van fless with chwill bring lots of pedestrian safety features including left turn prohibitions, medium referages, traffic signals, and curb extensions and make van ness a safer place to walk and drive. we have begun to motorcycle campaign. motorcycles are far disproportionately representered in the driver fatallies even th

board is requesting is unreasonable, i think is rational to bring back a historic flow for the #2350u mupths they are requesting and think it is good for california qu fuper generation and good for us. water conservation measures san francisco is putting in place is quite effective. people have been living up to what is requested of them to conserve water. as a buildser i put in different types of technology in the buildings. i have one gallon flow toilets. one flush, one gallon not the one.28 required by cam. the shower heads are more efficient than required by the state for 2017 building or plumbing codes. housing can still happen. we can still build housing with what we have, we just need to be better doing what we do. i would like to see the commission take a look at some of the concerns that a lot of the people here have issue with and wish you all the best. hope we have a healthy river. >> thank you. anybody else? is dollar there anybody else after anybody else? okay. come on up. >> hello. my name is jacob roberts and didn't expect to speak today, but i'm not from san francisco i grew

this gives a ovview of the number of referrals we receive each mupth. the first month of impmentation we had 30 referrals which is not surprising. most were from family members and family members are a long proponent adopting aot in san francisco. since that time it leveled off and on achberage we have 9 referrals a month. looking at the number of court orders in total in the first year of implementation we filed 7 core petitions. two of which were extensions of existing core putensions so only 5 individuals that we putensioned the court to order into treatment. the result of those are three resulted in a settlement akbrument where the individual agrud to work with us, three court ordered to participate in outpatient service and one withdrawn because we were unable to contact the individual. in total 60 percent of the individuals we had contact with accepted voluntary sunchss. the number of core petitions filed is lower than in other counties and speak tooz the uniqueness of our program and care team outreaching kwl engage individuals in voluntary servi

the task force is behind this and need only 3 hours a mupth. what i'm talking about is to be aprized of the shaping and isn't that a unusual opportunity for our commission to be part of that. >> okay. >> so my proposal for small business is first that the commission be involved in the shaping of these and then that we have regularly experts who would kind of aprize us of what is going on in the city so we can chime in and give our contribution. >> okay. i would propose that those presentations be well thought out in advance and very specific in their analysis and recommendation to us. and not a general overview of the situation. okay. any other-so, we should get ahead of this cannabis legislation as it effects the city and our small business for sure. alright. any other new business suggestions? alrightfelt any public comment on our new business discussion? seeing none, public comment is closed. do we have-on to item 12. >> item number 12. before we do item number 12 s frks fgovtv could you show our slide? >> as is our custom we end the meeting

van orden building be completed for laering and action by historic preservation commission within 6 mupths of planning department approval of site permit or architectural addendum. since the commission packets were distributes rchbed no letters of support. one from the project sponsor pry to the packets and no known opposition. [inaudible] studio team t and other members the sponsors team are here to provide background on the evolution of the proposal. this conclude my presentation and available for questions. >> i have a quick question about the condition of approval. just curious, this condition of approval requires action by the planning department. it seems smaum unusual. the owner has no control over this condition. >> sorry, which condition? >> the condition about the designation is completed within 6 months. >> just they submit the report. >> the owners are submitting the report? >> that is correct. >> we want the report submitted within 6 months of approval. >> okay , thank you. >> as soon as you start speaking sfgtv will go to the kreen. screen. >> my name is [inaudible] studio c

the task force is behind this and need only 3 hours a mupth. what i'm talking about is to be aprized of the shaping and isn't that a unusual opportunity for our commission to be part of that. >> okay. >> so my proposal for small business is first that the commission be involved in the shaping of these and then that we have regularly experts who would kind of aprize us of what is going on in the city so we can chime in and give our contribution. >> okay. i would propose that those presentations be well thought out in advance and very specific in their analysis and recommendation to us. and not a general overview of the situation. okay. any other-so, we should get ahead of this cannabis legislation as it effects the city and our small business for sure. alright. any other new business suggestions? alrightfelt any public comment on our new business discussion? seeing none, public comment is closed. do we have-on to item 12. >> item number 12. before we do item number 12 s frks fgovtv could you show our slide? >> as is our custom we end the meeting

healthy foods and a number of variety of fruits and vegetables is placed on a report card and once a mupth food advocates go back to the store, rate the store in how well they are doing and sit down and meet with the store owners and talk about how to improve, how do we problem solve, how does the program serve you better. so, we want to end with jorge and i sharing initial evaluation and outcomes and numbers, we have numbers for you. by measuring success again we are talking about public health, we are talking economic development and we are talking about community strengthening, so we want to look all three of those pieces. is the community benefiting. are more healthy products sold and is this good for small independent family run businesses. the way we look at community is our advocates go into the stores before the store is reset, do customer surveys to see what type of vegetables does the community want stocked at the store. where do people cook. on the right in theteneder loin a large number people cook in their rooms so that informs the cooking demoes we do, so it has to be appropr

board is requesting is unreasonable, i think is rational to bring back a historic flow for the #2350u mupths they are requesting and think it is good for california qu fuper generation and good for us. water conservation measures san francisco is putting in place is quite effective. people have been living up to what is requested of them to conserve water. as a buildser i put in different types of technology in the buildings. i have one gallon flow toilets. one flush, one gallon not the one.28 required by cam. the shower heads are more efficient than required by the state for 2017 building or plumbing codes. housing can still happen. we can still build housing with what we have, we just need to be better doing what we do. i would like to see the commission take a look at some of the concerns that a lot of the people here have issue with and wish you all the best. hope we have a healthy river. >> thank you. anybody else? is dollar there anybody else after anybody else? okay. come on up. >> hello. my name is jacob roberts and didn't expect to speak today, but i'm not from san francisco i grew

van orden building be completed for laering and action by historic preservation commission within 6 mupths of planning department approval of site permit or architectural addendum. since the commission packets were distributes rchbed no letters of support. one from the project sponsor pry to the packets and no known opposition. [inaudible] studio team t and other members the sponsors team are here to provide background on the evolution of the proposal. this conclude my presentation and available for questions. >> i have a quick question about the condition of approval. just curious, this condition of approval requires action by the planning department. it seems smaum unusual. the owner has no control over this condition. >> sorry, which condition? >> the condition about the designation is completed within 6 months. >> just they submit the report. >> the owners are submitting the report? >> that is correct. >> we want the report submitted within 6 months of approval. >> okay , thank you. >> as soon as you start speaking sfgtv will go to the kreen. screen. >> my name is [inaudible] studio c

is community consensus on the scheme for the playground and i expect that sometime in the next 6 mupthsill be a concept plan for your review and approval. and then there are preliminary studies in process before the participatory design begins for the second 3 of the first 6 tier one playground. that is [inaudible] panhandle play grown and john mclaren at the picnic areament that brings us to today which is next step formalizing a partnership. we ask to approve the grant agreement to recommend the boardf supervisors accept the grant and approve the mou between the department and parks alliance on how we'll partner on this project. so, to start with the grant agreement, here is highlights. the term of the agreement is 8 years and then the grant agreement defines a general use of funds for the initiative and playground budgets will be developed on a project by project basis. only private funds will be used for campaign expenses including park alliance staff and playground related special events qu the goal is $10.75 million but we seek approval to accept up to $15 million in case the part

this gives a ovview of the number of referrals we receive each mupth. the first month of impmentation we had 30 referrals which is not surprising. most were from family members and family members are a long proponent adopting aot in san francisco. since that time it leveled off and on achberage we have 9 referrals a month. looking at the number of court orders in total in the first year of implementation we filed 7 core petitions. two of which were extensions of existing core putensions so only 5 individuals that we putensioned the court to order into treatment. the result of those are three resulted in a settlement akbrument where the individual agrud to work with us, three court ordered to participate in outpatient service and one withdrawn because we were unable to contact the individual. in total 60 percent of the individuals we had contact with accepted voluntary sunchss. the number of core petitions filed is lower than in other counties and speak tooz the uniqueness of our program and care team outreaching kwl engage individuals in voluntary servi