they submitted at the end or during this time the assets could change owners could the assets of murayevnged a few more we can already see what we changed but here it will be difficult to catch up but the optimist will take a lot well we recorded for ourselves which assets we found, which ones changed owners, and we will ask these four subjects of the submission what happened. the assets will go to the ukrainian, there is a great question, what is the logic, the court says we will take it away after that, the cabinet of ministers determines who deals with the assets, it may not be a specialized agency, we have an agency for the management of seized property, now with what bunch problems, a lot of problems, i would not give them the property. now i will tell you frankly, but it does not depend on the fireplace, or the fireplace can give the property to the state property management fund, which was headed by panomer and to whom i have great respect, and whose results say that it seems to me that he will be able to manage us effectively what about this property depends on the property, on t

legally, they did not submit, did they submit at the end, or during this time, the assets could murayev'swners, they changed a few more, we already see them changing, but here it will be difficult to catch up, but the optimist will take a lot. well, we wrote down which assets we found, which changed the owner, and we will ask these four subjects about what happened and in general, how much time do we have to pass from the moment, let's say, when the decision was made by the court, and the court was not the court before these resources, these collectives, will get to the ukrainian question tanya, what is the logic of the court saying we take it away after this cabinet of ministers determines who deals with the assets, it may not be a specialized agency, we have an agency for the management of seized property, yes. what a lot of problems, a lot of problems. i would n't give them the property. state property, which was headed by a panomer and for which i have great respect and whose results say that it seems to me that we can effectively manage what with this property depends on the property

legally, they did not submit, did they submit at the end, or during this time, the assets could murayev'sssets could change owners, they changed a few more, we can already see what was compared , but here it will be difficult to catch up, but we are optimistic , we will take a lot. in general, how much time do we have to pass from the moment, let's say, when the decision was made by the court and the court, not the court itself, and before these resources, these assets get to the ukrainian treasury, an excellent question , what is the logic of the court saying that we take it away after that the cabinet of ministers determines who deals with assets, it can be non-specialized, there is an agency , we have an agency for the management of seized property , which is a lot of problems, a lot of problems. i would not give them the property . the property headed by pierre and for which i have great respect and the results of which show that he seems to me to be able to manage effectively what with this property depends on the property, on the asset, for example the huge ocean plaza in kyiv where

well, on the other hand , for us, for ukraine, putin trained murayev there.are still training yanukovych medvedchuk. i think that medvedchuk is now studying at the school of the president of ukraine named after stalin on an accelerated basis. but well, this is a completely different story. when putin was preparing someone, he was thinking first of all about the dismantling of the political system in belarus. he does not want to dismantle the political system, it suits him. and when he was preparing someone for us in the 22nd year, this there will be an installation of the political system, this is what maryan led the government to do, the occupation, but when he was preparing yanukovych, well, there was the fourth and tenth year, it was also an absolutely clear idea that this person should destroy the ukrainian state infrastructure. and what does he want to do with it if we have a minister of defense by the citizens of the russian federation, well , imagine it was also a completely different task, and then you know that it is a different state. it was gradual