and branded an anti-semite by murdoch and his people. and judith is no anti-semite, believe me. and she was living in hollywood at the time, and that's like a death sentence. i'm of jewish origin myself, believe in christ as well, and i can tell you that if you're an anti-semite in hollywood, you're going nowhere. what happened was my book went into never-neverland at that point. and then all of a sudden last year they started advertising on the internet the sale of "whores," that's harpercollins, the parent company that continued on. and when i wrote to them and asked them, you know, when are we doing the book tour, when are we doing the promotion, they said, oh, by the way, your book's canceled. i said, well, how do you sell a book under my name and defraud the american people and not publish it? to this day i don't know of anyone who's gotten their money back. so thank god for new chapter publisher who is publishing this book. the owner is a renaissance man originally from italy, came here about 25 years ago because he loves the unite

. >> i now work for rupert murdoch, and a lot of people think rupert murdoch is the guy -- he created fox news, and it had a media logical attack on cnn, and there was a great deal of fear at the time he took over "the wall street journal" that he might use it to compete with "the new york times" the same way he used fox to compete with cnn. you could not do anything to drag the editorial page further to the right than it already is. a lot of us were worried about that, and it has not happened. why hasn't it happened? it has not happened because rupert is a smart business person, and our audience appreciates the fact that in the news pages -- sure, we provide analysis and try to put things in perspective, but we know -- they know we'll police attempt -- it is not that we do not have biases and that they did not creep into the reporting, but they know we are trying to go out and find out what really happened and tell them what happened, and our audience appreciates that, in part because they are in business, and when you're putting money down on the line, you cannot afford a vice when

one is that murdoch, his e-mails are printed out of do you can read them. seriously by the way. to cup, he is negotiating. he is trying to put you guys on the defensive and get you to pay something as others that got me to pay. you pay 125 million to the book publishing industry in google lisk coming to realize as you have with you to the any professional content. reengineers youtube made a mistake. they thought user-generated content would be the way. the truth is the advertiser does not want their friendly at next to some dog pooling so you have to have more professional content in you have to pay for it as you are starting to generate more income at youtube because of it. but i don't know, i wish i had a good answer for that question and i wish "new york times" had a good answer that question but i would rather beat the "new york times" and the st. louis post dispatch for the detroit news or san diego union or a lot of other newspapers. the times has some advantages. the particular problem like a lot of papers they have a huge debt loads and that's a coming to and they have t

i have done murdoch. >> my good friend. it is good to see you. congratulations on your new book. >> thank you. >> very positive. >> the guys knew me. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] >> constantly. torture in northern ireland. test some bit of wake up. >> war stories. >> yes. >> i see it every day. >> i've liked working there. >> with the kevin you there. >> nice to meet you. >> very nice to meet you. very nice. >> i know. >> very nice to meet you. it's very nice. >> this is my husband, allan. >> oh. [inaudible conversations] >> we are going to talk later. and just couldn't decision over there. people want me to sign books. >> right. you have got to speak. >> i have got to speak now. >> very nice to meet you. >> thank you. >> i just spoke to donald. >> is a lawyer. came over. though, he did. i have bad news for him. >> yeah. >> is that all right? >> i would be. well, keep it from my wife. >> i will be on that. at one that does not tell your . >> really. >> ladies and gentlemen, welcome. i'm delighted to see you all here at the

. >> hi, i am john murdoch a local attorney and freelance writer. mr. nasheed described black friday as the perfect post christian fees tenet prins me to ask what are your thoughts on the marriage between the religious culture warriors and big business interests in conservatism? >> that was a quotation from david glurtner but i found it in seigel actually. you are pointing out i suppose is certain fall line in the conservative movement between social conservatives and those who were more interested in economic issues and in promoting economic growth and that presumably would involve promoting spending for consumer expenditures and so forth. that is a fault line, which periodically leads to a certain amount of friction, but generally, what i have found it my studies that if you talk to a traditionalist conservative, a church going conservative lead essay or someone very concerned with the right to like issues or the marriage issue and so forth, those people also are disposed to favor a free society. they may not favor the extravagant consumerist manifest

. >> but i want to say one more thing about this because i now work for rupert murdoch, and a lot ofpert murdoch is the guy, you know, he created fox news, and fox news had this attack on cnn, and there was a great deal of fear at the time he took over "the wall street journal" that he might use us to compete with with "the new york times" the same way he used fox news to compete with cnn. i'm not talking about the editorial the page, you couldn't do anything to drag the editorial page further to the right than it already is. [laughter] in fact, rupert has been a moderating influence on the editorial page of the wall street journal, but the news pages. and a lot of us were worried about that. and it hasn't happened. why hasn't it happened? well, because rupert is a smart business person, and our audience appreciates the fact that in the news pages we try -- sure, we provide analysis and we try and put things in perspective, but they know that we at least attempt -- it's not that we don't have personal biases and it's not that those biases don't sometimes seep into the reporting, but

. >> i now work for rupert murdoch, and a lot of people think rupert murdoch is the guy -- he created fox news, and it had a media logical attack on cnn, and there was a great deal of fear at the time he took over "the wall street journal" that he might use it to compete with "the new york times" the same way he used fox to compete with cnn. you could not do anything to drag the editorial page further to the right than it already is. a lot of us were worried about that, and it has not happened. why hasn't it happened? it has not happened because rupert is a smart business person, and our audience appreciates the fact that in the news pages -- sure, we provide analysis and try to put things in perspective, but we know -- they know we'll police attempt -- it is not that we do not have biases and that they did not creep into the reporting, but they know we are trying to go out and find out what really happened and tell them what happened, and our audience appreciates that, in part because they are in business, and when you're putting money down on the line, you cannot afford a vice when