. ♪ man: at the beginning of, um, of 2020, i had an exhibition at the university museum of contemporary art city, and it was an introspective exhibition called "customatism," and that exhibition had been prepared for years. i mean, had 30 years of work, if not more, probably, like, 40 years of work, and it was supposed to come to the museum of contemporary art in san diego, but then, all of a sudden, we had this pandemic. woman on tv: china has identified the cause of a mysterious new virus. man on tv: we now have a name for the disease-- covid-19. man 2 on tv: you must stay at home. president trump: we're asking

museums in the city will be free over the first weekend of december. and saturday will feature museums on the outskirts of town like the brand new institute of contemporary art in the dog patch. >> and then on sunday downtown museums like the asian art museum and they will also have free admission. and just in time for the holiday, the shipping rush, the post office, well they're showing off the brand new tool. >> it's called the small unit delivery sorter. take a look at this thing. it will take four employees to operate and can sort up to 3,000 packages per hour. >> this is one of more than 200 new machines put into the post offices just ahead of the holidays. >> well as the package volume will increase, the machine will be critical. and the volume that it can process to getting us done on time, so the carriers could get out earlier to serve the customers for the holiday season. >> and hard to believe we are just 4 had 1 days away from christmas. for people who like the plan, here are your shipping deadlines. >> write this down. december 9 is the deadline for military mail. december 17 for orders from stores. and first class packages. >> the priority mail

of modern a contemporary art. would make it illegal for artists, museums, galleries and collectors to display, sell, profit from, maybe even possess a significant quantity of works. it would ao chill the creation new art by established and up-and-coming artists ake these results are repugnant to copyright into the first amendment. you should reject them. ask you to reaffirm campbell and reversed the decision below. >> could you give us an example of any follow-on work fails your test? >> sure. ihink a classic example wld be a book to movie adaptation. i think that would be a follow-on work. it would be a derivative work. if someone were to try to do that, the original creator, the auorf the book, could very easily assert tha that was not fair use andhat have you win a case under factor four and probably also under factor one certainly that would b a kind of classic example of a follow-on work that would not count. >> why? i mean, derivative works are generally in a different mediu and almost all of them, even a dramatizationn theater or even a motion picture or suel, they had something new according to your definition

of merand contemporary art. making it illegal for artists, museums, galleries and collectors, to display, sell, profit from, and maybe even possesses ignition quality o works. it would also control new art. results of repugnant to copyright into the first amendment, you should reject them and reaffirm campbell and rerse this june below. >>can you give usan example a follow on work that fails your test. >> the classic example would be a bookto movie adaptation, that would be a followon work that would be a derivative work. i think if someone were to try to do that, i think the original creator, the author of the book could very easily assert that that was not fair use. and we have a winning case under factor for and probably also under factor, one and certainly a classic example of a follow on work that would not un >> why? derivative works are generally in a different medium, and almost all of them, even a dramatization on theater, or ev aotion picture, or sequel, they add something new according to your definition, in your brief. so why shouldn't they be protected as well? according to your theory. >> i think t

of modern and contemporary art. would me it illegal for artists, museums, galleries a collectors to display, sell, profit from, maybe even possess aignificant quantity of works. it would also chill the creation of new art by estabsh and up-and-coming artists alike. these results are repugnant to copyright into the first amendment. you should reject them. ask you to reaffirm campbell and reversed the decision below. >> could you give us an example of any follow-on work that fails your test? >> sure. i think a classic example would be a booko moviedaptation. i think that would be a follow-on work. itould be a derivative work. if someone were to try to do at the original creator, the author of the book, could vy easily assert that that was not fair use and what have you win a case under factor four and probably also under factor one. certainly that would be a kind classic example of a follow-on work that would not coun >> why? i mean, derivative works are generally in a different medium and almost all of them, even a dramatization on theater or eve a motion picture or a sequel, ey had something new according to your de

museum is reviving the work of seven great frost collector entrepreneurs for them, business was inseparable from social responsibility, and a significant part of the income went to create unique collections of contemporary arts ivan abramovich morozov and his brother mikhail, who was not just a collector, but much wider than collector a, who , together with his family, was a great reformer, and russia, a man who carried away culture in the broadest sense of the word, and the whole family, e, were exclusively socially oriented people, which is very important. the award will be given for special achievements in organizing the improvement of public spaces through contemporary art projects. but in moscow , road signs for electric scooters will appear very soon, and on some streets, they will prohibited in all innovations will be immediately after advertising. wait never compared the prices for osago and bought a policy in the same insurance do not overpay, draw up a policy on compare and save up to five and a half thousand rubles, because the price for the year is different. if insurance, then compare choose better all crusts perfectionists eat only grain pockets never use growth hormones and harmful additives.