that would strike many as state propaganda against the muslim brotherhood.100% state propaganda and i didn't agree to it. it is on the movie as seen by egyptians. i don't have control over the movie in egypt as the producer. from day one, in the premiere of the film i went on tv and on every tv channel i said, "people, discard this, this is wrong, i'm completely against it because the film is actually about coexistence. it's not about propaganda to any side so discard this." but the producer had an ultimatum. i put this or there is no film. i disagreed, he didn't. would you have pulled the film? obviously not internationally but... i'm going to tell you why we made the film in the first place. we made the film in this time because this is the time when people are fighting and killing each other. it is the right time to tell them, don't do that. i would have made the film ten years later with no problem. people would have welcomed the film. so, to me as a film—maker, i was dreaming of the day this film gets released because it is not about cinema any more, it

but it was very clear, this was the muslim brotherhood carrying out their threat that if you remove the muslim brother leader from presidency before he took control, while he was taking his commands from an imam, a religious holy radicalized islamist, i'm told they had him on video taking orders from such an imam. well, he didn't get back into power. nd they recognized, the muslim brotherhood is a terrorist group. and my friend ted cruz has filed a bill and we filed one here in the house to recognize the muslim brotherhood as a terrorist organization that it is. and i know that replacing obamacare is a system for taking care of people's health is a priority for so many of us. but we have got to multi task and not lose sight of the fact that we're still under the threat of radical islam. they still want to kill us. they still want to eliminate our way of life here in the united states. so while we are hopefully about to create a better health care system in the united states, we got to make sure the united states is protected. and for those who are so open-minded that they want to make s

she is a one-time prominent supporter of the muslim brotherhood, an organization trump may designate terrorist organization. joining us general jack keane. let's start first with north korea. it looks to be insistent upon provoking the west certainly the united states with the nuclear test, more ballistic missiles have been launched. your judgment? jack: we are on a collision course with north korea. we cannot poll rate that move and that's going to result in us either having to do a cyber attack to defeat them and/or a kinetic air and cruise missile strike to defeat these launch facilities. that lab preemptive strike. we have to communicate this clearly to the chinese that you are leaving us with no option but a military option as you are permitting your client state to move towards a threatening situation to the american people. and that's the course we are currently on. lou: the specific policy reiterated by the pentagon. the response the united states will be as they put sit overwhelming if north korea were to attack south korea or of any our allies in the region. jack: if we con

the akp is affiliated with the muslim brotherhood.shoulds and jordan and morocco and have an influence sal role. that whole notion is part of the miscon sellings that have -- misconceptions that have come up but hopefully reason will prevail. >> when i listen to you now as we come to a close and all of these issues issues issues issuy i'm reminded reminded of favorin interview with robert strauss, the great texas lawyer, negotiator, who was believely sent out to be the american middle east negotiator, and he had never been to the west bank so he came to israel and the israelis gave him a helicopter tour of the west bank, and afterward head gathered the king david hotel with a group of reporters. they said, mr. strauss, what did you think of the west bank? he said, couldn't tell you. they said, no. he said i couldn't tell you. he said off the record. >> they said off the record. >> i said i don't know why one though would want and it why the other one wouldn't just give it to them. i think of that when i think of the job of being secre

the muslim brotherhood is a vast organization.their branches or networks are terrorist organizations. hamas is a designated terrorist organization. others are not. they have ties to organizations that have nothing to do with terrorism. part of the reason what even though it was on a list of executive orders that conversation is going to roll out, it hasn't happened because some coal of my template that it it it just, we can't do it. we don't know what to draw the line. what do you do with turkey? the akp is a philly with the muslim brotherhood. what do you do in countries like tunisia where their partners and government cracks what he do in country like jordan and morocco? i think that whole notion is again, part of the misconception that come up in trying to place domestic and foreign constituencies. but hopefully reason will prevail on that. it would be another long goal after the executive order on muslims emigration. >> when i listen to you as we, to a close and all of these issues and the complexity and irreconcilability of d

it's not clear where she would stand on placing the muslim brotherhood on the u.s.error list, something the trump white house would like to do, but something many middle east experts say would be a big mistake. >> dana: there was activity in yemen last night? >> we just had a briefing with a senior u.s. defense official. the pentagon said the intelligence gathered from the navy seal raid on january 29th is potentially actionable. kwoerbt it's definitely helping us understand the network and further develop it out. this official described it as large volumes of information, including who's connected to who as part of the information the seals recovered from that operation. i' good information we're told by this official. we were told the navy s.e.a.l.s. collected a computer and ten mobile phones and would be undoubtedly scanning those phones for potential targets. now, this official said al qaeda in the arabian peninsula represents a greater threat to the u.s. home land than isis. top intelligence officials have long been concerned about their ability to build nonmet

america whose research focuses on policies countering radicalization and on the activities of muslim brotherhood. he earned a law degree and dock trait from fletcher school of law andy ploemt si. he has held positions at harvard university for science and internation until affairs at the kennedy and the center for security studies at the swiss federal institute of technology. in 2016 he was appointed by italian prime minister as coordinator of the national commission on jihadist. please welcome him. >> thank you for your kind words and for entrugs sting us with y organization. it would like to welcome you all to this two-day event of radicalization. since our start which was two years ago we have been working on issues related to this topic. we have been focusing a lot of attention on isis and we look for attention in all forms and have produced a lot of reports on how those groups use the internet. a lot of dynamics. they are common among idealologies. throughout our work we have come to two major conclusions. now days the internet plays a major role in radicalization processes. we did a study

countering radicalization, on the mobilization techniques of jihadist networks and activities of muslim brotherhood inspired organizations in the west. here and a law degree and a doctorate. he has held positions at harvard university at the kennedy school of government, that the u.s. institute of peace, and the center for security studies at the swiss federal institute of technology. in 2016, he was opponent by italian prime minister as i coordinator of national commission jihadist organization. please join me in welcoming doctor lorenzo. [applause] >> thank you for the kind words and for entrusting us. it's major honor for us. on behalf of the program i would like to welcome you to this event on countering radicalization. since our start two years ago been working on issues related to the topic. were focusing our attention on isis and we look for all forms of extremism and have looked at right-wing extremism. there's a lot of dynamics on online extremism. throughout the work we have come to two conclusions. the first is that the internet plays a major role in radicalization processes. we did a st

they reference the muslim brotherhood. still percolating. ey also reference the issue of the muslim ban, they say they do not feel this is a ban on all muslims or attack against islam. more an internal matter of maintaining internal security. good point. up a including iran, as you mentioned, what did they say about the nuclear deal? , they thinkted out the nuclear deal as it is now is willomething they think maintain peace in the region. that it is dangerous. they were happy that president trump agreed with them on iran's region.n move in the this meeting of minds between trump and saudi arabia on the iran deal which they never thought was a great deal. trump may clear that he didn't agree with it. >> you are staying with us. i want to bring in our guest for this segment. the director and partner at global associates. thank you for joining us. we have been talking about the language the saudi's are using to describe trump, saying he is a true friend and has lent support to his wall idea. what exactly are the saudi's hoping to get out of the

they referenced the mudroom -- muslim brotherhood. ed the issue of the muslim ban and go out of the way to say they do not feel it is a ban on all muslims or on attack on islam, but more an internal matter of maintaining internal security. good: you bring up a point, those four points with the obama administration. including iran, what did they say about the nuclear deal? -- theypointed out repeated their previous position, they think the nuclear deal as it is now is not something they think will maintain peace in the region. they think is dangerous. they mentioned they were happy that president trump agreed with expansionists moves in the region. very much a meeting of minds between trump and saudi arabia on the issue of the iran deal. trump throughout his election campaign made clear he did not agree with that. tracy: i want to bring in our guest for this segment, the director and partner at cornerstone global associates. thank you for joining us. we have been talking about the language that the saudis are using to describe trump, sa

and also, i would agree iran is number one on the common threat list, also the rise of the muslim brotherhoodsuny is a threat, inside gaza in egypt, and -- the king of jordan. less complicated. we just talked about a whole bunch of monarchies. not republics. i guess the question i would ask you is what is the future of political islam? where does islam go in a world in which not every comp three -- country is a monarchy? thisd up my hand and say, arm is the sunni root. you have a variety of expressions of sunni political islam. you have isis over here.you've got al qaeda over here . you've got hamas here. you've got the brotherhood here. and then you have the turkish version here. you drive down part of the arm and you have common roots. where does that go? this one over here, which i discuss in the book, condoleezza rice thought that was political islam. i think she was right for a while, but unfortunately around got off 2012, erdogan the democracy bus. dan: and president obama thought, too. michael: yes. besides the other second and third order effects in the region, the fact that this kind

there was flyers bapassed aroun that said we were tied to the muslim brotherhood, signs that hung inave bayonne and stop the mosque and hate speeches at the meetings that accused islam of being backwards religion. my question for you, mr. jabbar, as a person that has time and time again had to defend why you chose islam as your faith, how do you feel your fellow muslims should respond to what is going on in my community? >> thank you for your question and i think what is going on in your committee is just an out ward station of bigotry. you have to go against that and use the law, so there are laws against discrimination and by bringing up false issues like parking and traffic congestion, they are able to frustrate your legitimate needs. so you have to go and just pursue your legitimate, what you have a legitimate right to desire, which is a place of worship. there is nothing wrong with that, you have to use the laws that are there and contest these people and fight them in court and make it so expensive for them that they will have to give up because you guys aren't doing anything w

farrakhan anti-semitic, anti-american, anti-white racist named keith ellison, a protege of the muslim brotherhood. that's what the democratic party have become. don't headache any mistake about -- make any mistake about the democratic party. the democratic party's candidate for president would have been bernie sanders, a lifelong supporter of communist causes who chose to be married in moss moss -- in moscow during the cold war, in the totalitarian empire. except that the crooked clintons fixed the primaries with the help of donna brazile and debbie wasserman schultz. that's the only reason bernie wasn't the candidate. it's a racist party, and it's a party of hate. and along came donald trump. [laughter] and his two chief aides happen to be two of my friends, steve bannon and steven miller. [applause] great americans. and the three of them put together this inaugural address which is a confrontation. it's the first time, a confrontation with this racist left. identity politics, racist left. finish remember the inaugural. trump said if we are loyal to our country, we will be loyal to each other. i

there were fliers passed around that said we were tie to the muslim brotherhood. ns that said save the houses, destroy the mosque. accused islam as because a backward religion, so again, why did you choose islam as your faith, how do you feel the muslims should respond to what is going on in my community? >> well, thank you for your question, i think that is what is going on in your community is an outward manifestation of bigotry. and you have to go against that and use the law. so there are laws against discrimination, by using laws like parking and congestion they're able to frustrate your means. so you have to go through and do what you have a legitimate right to desire, which is a place of worship. there is nothing wrong with that. so you just have to use the laws that are there and contest these people and fight them in court and make it so expensive for them that they will have to give up. because you guys are not doing anything wrong. >> you know, i think you're encouraging her to be active and to be activists and you have good reason to do so. because you

and also, i would agree iran is number one on the common threat list, also the rise of the muslim brotherhoodsunni extremism is a threat. it is a threat inside gaza and the west bank. egypt, and threat in jordan. michael: less complicated. we just talked about a whole lot of monarchies, not republics , other than israel. i guess the question i would ask you is what is the future of political islam? where does islam go in a world in which not every country is a monarchy? you have a republics. i hold up my hand and say, this arm is the sunni root. you have a variety of expressions of sunni political islam. you have isis over here. you've got al qaeda over here. you've got hamas here. you've got the brotherhood here. and then you have the turkish version here. you drive down part of the arm and you have common roots. where does that go? this one over here, the turkish one, i discuss in the book. condoleezza rice thought that was political islam we could bet on. erdogan in turkey. i think she was right for a while, but unfortunately around 2011 and 2012, erdogan got off the democracy bus. dan: an

i was never a member of the muslim brotherhood. why aren't i controversial? two reasons.tates where there is no freedom. —— that i will not support the leaders. dictators, this is were we have to speak of. at the same time, i am talking to my government in switzerland and other governments to say that if they are serious about us coming together, why are they not speaking out? why i see a green with saudi arabia? because they have money and influence. i am because they have money and influence. iam not because they have money and influence. i am not on both sides. when you are in between and not liked on both sides, maybe you are right. there is a strong element of islamic people that don't like it. are you the one that can go ahead and say, i can help you?” are you the one that can go ahead and say, i can help you? i am threatened by daesh that says that i am more dangerous for islam than non—muslims might. if i am criticised by them, i am on the right side. when it comes to muslims around the world, you can see that what i am trying to say today is the mainstream discou

also the rise of the muslim brotherhood, sunni extremism is a threat, it's a threat inside gaza and the west bank, so israel has a reason to be concerned about it. and it is a threat to sisi in egypt, it is a threat to king abdullah in jordan. >> yep. >> senor: the gulf sunni states. >> yeah, you know, life's complicated. we just talked about a whole bunch of monday arckies, not republics, other than israel. >> senor: right. >> and so i guess the question i would ask you is so what is the future of political islam. >> senor: right. >> where does islam go, going forward, in a world in which not every country is a monday arcky. in which you have republics. i kind of hold up my hand here and say if this-- is this arm here the sunni root, okay, you've got a variety of expressions of sunni political islam. you've got isis over here. you've got al-qaeda over here. you got hamas here. you got the brotherhood here, and you've got the acapa in turkey here much you drive far enough down my arm, dan, you got common roots. >> senor: right. >> all right? and so word where does that go? this one over

department, he's propag e propagated the false conspiracy theory, huma abedin has ties to the muslim brotherhood. supporters of jay street, organizations as kpos. the jews who cooperated with the nazis during the holocaust, these are extreme radical positions words like kapos resonate with me in particular because they reflect words again that you and i both know personally. from our family histories. how cruel, mean spirited that kind of language is. you understand that, right? >> i understand it, senator, and in addition to understanding it, in the course of thousands of e-mails i received, in response to those comments i received an e-mail from some of those comments were unrepeatable, some were frightening. a few of them were extraordinarily touching. one from a holocaust survivor who wrote me and said, he survived the holocaust, loves israel with all his heart, he disagreed with me on the breast tactics to support israel, he felt i had invalidated the good faith of his positions. the last person in the world i would want to offend is someone like that, it has -- it's something that i deeply

but the part that wasn't peace was caused by the muslim brotherhood. shast why they've been labeled a terrorist organization. that's why the united states should label them as a terrorist organization. regardless of what anybody hinks about president trump, his order was an attempt to protect americans and judges who think they are unaccountable as we haven't impeached near enough , become dictators. seize power that was never given to them. and that's why i've got a bill that we're preparing that would eliminate any jurisdiction for any federal court other than the supreme court to take up an issue involving immigration or refugees. other than immigration courts. but not on a constitutional level. not to issue an injunction to stop the congressional action or presidential action. that would have to come from the supreme court. that's the way it ought to be. the constitution was written, there was only one federal court provided for. that was the united states supreme court. any oth court tt is federal in this country owes its life, its jurisdiction, t